Lung Cancer Score

29518, Cades, South Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 29518, Cades, South Carolina

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 29518, Cades, South Carolina is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.99 percent of the residents in 29518 has some form of health insurance. 39.89 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.10 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29518 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 194 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29518. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 179 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 672 health care providers accessible to residents in 29518, Cades, South Carolina.

Health Scores in 29518, Cades, South Carolina

Lung Cancer Score 14
People Score 28
Provider Score 18
Hospital Score 37
Travel Score 47

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

29518 Cades South Carolina
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 29518, Cades, South Carolina

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 29518 and Primary Care Availability in Cades**

This analysis delves into the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 29518, encompassing the town of Conway, South Carolina, and specifically examines primary care availability in the nearby community of Cades. Our assessment considers key factors influencing a patient's journey, from initial screening to ongoing support. We will assess physician-to-patient ratios, identify potentially standout practices, gauge telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the accessibility of mental health resources. The aim is to provide a comprehensive overview, highlighting both strengths and areas needing improvement in the provision of lung cancer care.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care lies in accessible primary care. In Cades, a rural area, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical indicator. A low PCP-to-patient ratio could significantly hinder early detection, as it affects the ability to schedule routine screenings and address initial symptoms promptly. This scarcity can also lead to longer wait times for appointments, delaying diagnosis and potentially affecting treatment outcomes. Moreover, the lack of readily available primary care can force residents to seek care in more populated areas, adding logistical challenges and increased travel times, which can be especially burdensome for individuals already facing health challenges.

Within ZIP Code 29518, the physician-to-patient ratio for all specialties, including primary care, needs careful examination. Data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and other public health sources will be crucial in establishing this ratio. A higher ratio, reflecting a greater number of patients per physician, may indicate a strain on healthcare resources. This can manifest in shorter appointment times, reduced opportunities for personalized care, and increased patient load for each doctor, which can lead to burnout and decreased quality of care.

Identifying standout practices within 29518 requires a nuanced approach. This involves evaluating practices based on several criteria. The first is the availability of comprehensive lung cancer screening programs, which adhere to the guidelines established by organizations like the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Secondly, it is important to examine the practice's integration of multidisciplinary care, including access to pulmonologists, oncologists, radiologists, and thoracic surgeons. Thirdly, the patient experience, including wait times, ease of appointment scheduling, and patient satisfaction, is a crucial factor. Finally, the practice's commitment to community outreach and education, such as offering smoking cessation programs and public awareness campaigns, is also important.

Telemedicine adoption is a transformative factor in healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas like Cades. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with specialists remotely, receive follow-up care, and participate in support groups without the need for extensive travel. Evaluating the extent of telemedicine adoption among practices in 29518 involves assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and the integration of telehealth platforms into the overall care process. The adoption of telemedicine can significantly improve access to specialized care, particularly for patients in Cades who may face challenges in accessing healthcare services.

Mental health resources are an integral part of comprehensive lung cancer care. A diagnosis of lung cancer can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. Therefore, the availability of mental health services, including counseling, therapy, and support groups, is crucial. Assessing the accessibility of these resources involves examining the presence of on-site mental health professionals, the integration of mental health services into the overall care plan, and the availability of referrals to external mental health providers. The presence of support groups, specifically tailored to lung cancer patients and their families, can provide a vital source of emotional support and shared experiences.

The success of lung cancer care hinges on collaboration and coordination. In 29518 and Cades, this means fostering strong relationships between primary care physicians, specialists, hospitals, and community organizations. Effective communication and information sharing are critical to ensure that patients receive seamless and coordinated care. The presence of patient navigators, who can assist patients in navigating the healthcare system, coordinating appointments, and accessing resources, can significantly improve the patient experience.

Furthermore, it is important to assess the availability of financial assistance programs and resources for patients facing financial hardship. Lung cancer treatment can be expensive, and the cost of care can be a significant barrier for some patients. Identifying resources, such as patient assistance programs, grants, and support from charitable organizations, can help alleviate the financial burden and ensure that patients can access the care they need.

The evaluation of lung cancer care in 29518 and Cades should also consider the role of patient education and empowerment. Providing patients with clear and concise information about their diagnosis, treatment options, and potential side effects is essential. Empowering patients to actively participate in their care decisions can improve treatment adherence and overall outcomes. This includes providing access to educational materials, online resources, and opportunities to engage in shared decision-making with their healthcare providers.

Finally, continuous monitoring and evaluation are crucial for improving lung cancer care. Regularly assessing the effectiveness of screening programs, treatment protocols, and supportive services can help identify areas for improvement and ensure that patients receive the best possible care. This involves collecting data on patient outcomes, satisfaction levels, and access to care, and using this information to inform quality improvement initiatives.

In conclusion, the provision of lung cancer care in ZIP Code 29518 and the surrounding areas is a complex issue. The availability of primary care in Cades, the physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources all play a critical role. By addressing these factors and fostering collaboration among healthcare providers, community organizations, and patients, it is possible to improve the quality of care and outcomes for individuals affected by lung cancer.

To visualize the healthcare landscape in 29518 and Cades, including physician locations, hospital proximity, and resource availability, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. These maps can provide a valuable visual representation of the data discussed in this analysis, empowering you with the information needed to make informed decisions about your healthcare.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 29518, Cades, South Carolina

You may also like

29560, Lake City, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 7.61 Miles

Total Population:

29556, Kingstree, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 7.91 Miles

Total Population:

29530, Coward, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 15.39 Miles

Total Population:

29564, Lane, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 18.58 Miles

Total Population:

29541, Effingham, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 21.73 Miles

Total Population:

29555, Johnsonville, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 21.83 Miles

Total Population:

29554, Hemingway, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 24.21 Miles

Total Population:

29505, Florence, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 25.80 Miles

Total Population:

29510, Andrews, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 29518: 26.31 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 29518, Cades, South Carolina