The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 29667, Norris, South Carolina is 55 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.15 percent of the residents in 29667 has some form of health insurance. 50.68 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29667 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 54 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 7 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29667. An estimate of 12 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 65 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,232 health care providers accessible to residents in 29667, Norris, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29667, Norris, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score | 79 |
---|---|
People Score | 87 |
Provider Score | 55 |
Hospital Score | 49 |
Travel Score | 45 |
29667 | Norris | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 29667 & Primary Care in Norris
This analysis delves into the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 29667, encompassing the town of Norris, South Carolina, and surrounding areas. The goal is to provide a nuanced "Lung Cancer Score" assessment, considering factors crucial for patient outcomes, including physician availability, practice quality, and access to supportive services. This score, while not a definitive metric, offers a comparative view of the healthcare environment and highlights areas of strength and potential improvement.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests upon the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). Norris, being a smaller community, presents a unique challenge. Primary care availability is paramount for early detection through screening, prompt referrals to specialists, and ongoing management of comorbidities. A limited number of PCPs in the area can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. This scarcity necessitates a focus on optimizing existing resources and exploring innovative solutions.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical component of the Lung Cancer Score. Ideally, a lower ratio indicates greater access to care. Data from various sources, including the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the American Medical Association (AMA), would be essential to determine the precise PCP-to-patient ratio within ZIP Code 29667. This data would reveal the extent to which the community is underserved and the potential impact on patient access. The score would be negatively impacted if the ratio is high.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care practices is crucial. This includes factors like the experience of the physicians, the availability of on-site diagnostic tools (e.g., X-ray machines), and the practice's commitment to preventive care, such as lung cancer screening programs. Practices actively participating in these programs would receive a higher score. Furthermore, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) and their interoperability with specialist networks would be a positive factor, facilitating seamless communication and care coordination.
Specialist availability is another vital aspect of the Lung Cancer Score. This includes pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons, and radiation oncologists. The proximity of these specialists to Norris and the surrounding areas is critical. Longer travel distances can create barriers to care, particularly for patients who are already experiencing the physical and emotional challenges of a lung cancer diagnosis. The score would be enhanced by the presence of a comprehensive network of specialists within a reasonable radius.
Standout practices, those that demonstrate exceptional commitment to lung cancer care, would significantly elevate the Lung Cancer Score. This might include practices with dedicated lung cancer screening programs, multidisciplinary teams (comprising physicians, nurses, social workers, and other healthcare professionals), and participation in clinical trials. These practices often offer a higher level of patient-centered care and are more likely to adopt evidence-based practices. Identifying and highlighting these practices is essential for promoting best practices and improving patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly in rural areas like Norris. Telemedicine can help bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access specialist consultations, follow-up appointments, and supportive care services from the comfort of their homes. Practices that have embraced telemedicine and offer virtual consultations would receive a higher score. The ability to remotely monitor patients' symptoms and provide timely interventions can significantly improve their quality of life.
The Lung Cancer Score also considers the availability of mental health resources. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, is crucial for supporting patients and their families. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models would receive a higher score. This integration can improve patient coping mechanisms and adherence to treatment plans.
Furthermore, the availability of support groups and patient education resources is essential. These resources provide patients with a sense of community, allowing them to share experiences, learn coping strategies, and access valuable information about their disease. Practices that actively promote and facilitate access to these resources would positively impact the Lung Cancer Score.
Another important factor is the accessibility of financial assistance programs. Lung cancer treatment can be expensive, and many patients struggle to afford their medications, treatments, and other healthcare costs. Practices that help patients navigate financial assistance programs, such as those offered by pharmaceutical companies or charitable organizations, would receive a higher score.
The score would also factor in the availability of palliative care services. Palliative care focuses on improving the quality of life for patients with serious illnesses. It addresses physical, emotional, and spiritual needs. The presence of palliative care specialists and programs in the area would significantly improve the Lung Cancer Score.
The overall Lung Cancer Score for ZIP Code 29667, and specifically for primary care availability in Norris, would be a composite of these factors. A comprehensive analysis would involve gathering data from multiple sources, including healthcare providers, government agencies, and patient advocacy groups. The score would reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare environment and provide a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
By understanding the current landscape, healthcare providers can identify areas for improvement, such as increasing the number of PCPs, enhancing specialist availability, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding access to mental health resources. Patients can use the information to make informed decisions about their care and advocate for improved services.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 29667, including the location of healthcare providers, specialist availability, and other relevant data, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that can help you visualize the healthcare environment and make informed decisions about your care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like