The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 29832, Johnston, South Carolina is 14 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.65 percent of the residents in 29832 has some form of health insurance. 41.53 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29832 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,137 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 6 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29832. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 974 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 971 health care providers accessible to residents in 29832, Johnston, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29832, Johnston, South Carolina
| Lung Cancer Score | 6 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 17 |
| Provider Score | 14 |
| Hospital Score | 31 |
| Travel Score | 42 |
| 29832 | Johnston | South Carolina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Johnston, SC (ZIP Code 29832)
Analyzing the landscape of lung cancer care within Johnston, South Carolina (ZIP Code 29832), requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources, ultimately aiming to provide a 'Lung Cancer Score' assessment. This score, while not a definitive numerical value, reflects the overall accessibility and quality of care for individuals facing this devastating disease within the specified geographical area.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care lies in robust primary care. Early detection is crucial, and primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact. Their ability to screen for risk factors, order appropriate imaging, and refer patients to specialists significantly impacts survival rates. In Johnston, assessing primary care availability involves examining the number of PCPs per capita, the wait times for appointments, and the acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, which are often utilized by older patients at higher risk for lung cancer. A scarcity of PCPs, lengthy wait times, and limited insurance acceptance would negatively impact the 'Lung Cancer Score.'
Furthermore, the physician-to-patient ratio within the 29832 ZIP code is a critical factor. A higher ratio, indicating a greater concentration of physicians, generally suggests improved access to care. However, this ratio alone does not tell the whole story. The specialties of the physicians present are also vital. The presence of pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons is essential for comprehensive lung cancer care. The absence of these specialists would severely limit the availability of advanced diagnostics, treatment options, and surgical interventions, thereby lowering the 'Lung Cancer Score.' The proximity of these specialists to the patient population is also considered. Long travel times to access specialized care can delay diagnosis and treatment, impacting patient outcomes.
Identifying standout practices within Johnston is crucial. These practices often demonstrate excellence in patient care, innovative approaches to treatment, and a commitment to community outreach. Factors to consider include the practice's use of evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening and treatment, the availability of patient navigators to guide patients through the complex healthcare system, and the practice's participation in clinical trials, which provide access to cutting-edge therapies. Practices with a strong track record of patient outcomes and a patient-centered approach would positively influence the 'Lung Cancer Score.'
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas like Johnston. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, providing patients with access to specialists who may not be readily available locally. This includes virtual consultations, remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment, and access to educational resources. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring capabilities, would receive a higher 'Lung Cancer Score' rating. Conversely, practices lacking telemedicine capabilities would be assessed less favorably, potentially limiting access to vital care.
The integration of mental health resources into lung cancer care is another crucial component. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, is essential for supporting patients throughout their treatment journey. Practices that proactively offer or refer patients to mental health services, including support groups, individual therapy, and psychiatric consultations, would receive a higher 'Lung Cancer Score.' The absence of these resources would negatively impact the score, reflecting a potential gap in comprehensive patient care.
The overall assessment of the 'Lung Cancer Score' for Johnston, SC (29832) is a complex undertaking. It requires a comprehensive evaluation of all the factors mentioned above. It is important to note that the score is not a static number but a dynamic reflection of the healthcare landscape. Regular monitoring and evaluation are necessary to identify areas for improvement and ensure that patients in Johnston have access to the best possible lung cancer care. The availability of resources, the presence of specialists, the adoption of innovative technologies, and the integration of mental health support all contribute to the final score.
In addition to the factors already considered, the presence of community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about lung cancer risk factors, screening guidelines, and available treatment options would also positively influence the 'Lung Cancer Score.' These programs can play a crucial role in early detection and prevention, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The involvement of local hospitals, clinics, and community organizations in these outreach efforts is also essential.
The ability of the healthcare system to address health disparities within the population is also considered. Lung cancer disproportionately affects certain demographic groups, such as those with lower socioeconomic status and individuals from minority communities. Practices that actively work to address these disparities, ensuring equitable access to care for all patients, would receive a higher score. This may involve providing culturally sensitive care, offering language assistance services, and tailoring treatment plans to meet the specific needs of diverse patient populations.
In conclusion, the 'Lung Cancer Score' for Johnston, SC (29832) is a holistic assessment that reflects the overall quality and accessibility of lung cancer care within the community. It is a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. By understanding these factors, stakeholders can work together to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of lung cancer in Johnston.
To gain a more visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Johnston, SC (29832), including the location of physicians, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data points, consider utilizing the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. Explore the geographical distribution of healthcare resources and gain a deeper understanding of the accessibility of lung cancer care within the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like