25005, Amma, West Virginia Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 25005, Amma, West Virginia is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 25005 has some form of health insurance. 67.67 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.38 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25005 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25005. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 90 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 66 health care providers accessible to residents in 25005, Amma, West Virginia.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 25005 and Primary Care in Amma**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality within ZIP Code 25005, focusing on lung cancer care, necessitates a multifaceted approach. We must consider the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), specialist access, and the integration of supportive resources. The proximity of Amma, a community likely impacted by the same healthcare landscape, further informs this analysis. The goal is to assess the overall readiness of this region to address lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and patient support.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests upon robust primary care. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, can hinder timely access to preventative screenings, such as low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals. Delays in diagnosis significantly impact prognosis in lung cancer. Investigating the PCP-to-patient ratio within 25005 and comparing it to state and national averages is paramount. Furthermore, the geographic distribution of PCPs within the ZIP Code is crucial. Are there underserved areas where access is particularly challenging? Identifying these disparities is essential for targeted interventions.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care matters. Are PCPs well-versed in lung cancer risk factors, screening guidelines, and early detection strategies? Do they actively encourage smoking cessation programs? Assessing the training and expertise of local PCPs, potentially through surveys or public data, provides valuable insights. The presence of established primary care practices with a history of proactive patient management and strong referral networks would significantly improve the Lung Cancer Score.

Specialist availability is another vital component. The presence of pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons, and radiation oncologists is essential for comprehensive lung cancer care. The distance patients must travel to access these specialists directly impacts their care. Longer travel times can lead to delays in diagnosis, treatment initiation, and follow-up appointments. Evaluating the proximity of these specialists to 25005 and Amma, along with their patient load and appointment availability, is a critical aspect of the analysis.

The adoption of telemedicine offers a promising avenue to improve access, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations with specialists, remote monitoring of patients, and educational programs. Assessing the telemedicine capabilities of local healthcare providers is essential. Do practices offer virtual appointments? Do they utilize remote monitoring devices? The integration of telehealth can bridge geographical barriers and improve patient outcomes.

The mental health of lung cancer patients is often overlooked. Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally and psychologically challenging. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is a critical factor in patient well-being and adherence to treatment plans. The analysis must assess the availability of these resources within 25005 and Amma, including their accessibility, cost, and integration with the broader healthcare system.

Standout practices within 25005 and the surrounding area deserve recognition. Identifying practices that excel in lung cancer care can serve as a model for others. These practices might demonstrate excellence in patient education, proactive screening programs, rapid referral pathways, or patient support services. Highlighting these practices can encourage the adoption of best practices and improve the overall quality of care.

The integration of community resources is also significant. Does the region have active partnerships with organizations like the American Lung Association or local cancer support groups? These organizations often provide valuable resources, such as patient education materials, support groups, and financial assistance. Assessing the level of community engagement and the availability of these resources contributes to a more comprehensive Lung Cancer Score.

The analysis must also consider socioeconomic factors. Poverty, lack of insurance coverage, and limited access to transportation can significantly impact healthcare access and outcomes. Understanding the socioeconomic profile of the population within 25005 and Amma is crucial for identifying disparities and tailoring interventions. Addressing these social determinants of health is essential for achieving equitable lung cancer care.

Data collection and analysis are key. Gathering information from various sources, including public health data, insurance claims data, physician directories, and patient surveys, is essential. This data must be analyzed to generate a comprehensive Lung Cancer Score, which should be presented in a clear and accessible format. The score should provide a snapshot of the region's readiness to address lung cancer and identify areas for improvement.

The Lung Cancer Score should not be a static assessment. It must be regularly updated and refined as healthcare practices and resources evolve. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential for tracking progress and ensuring that the region is providing the best possible care to lung cancer patients. The score should also be used to inform policy decisions and allocate resources effectively.

In conclusion, assessing lung cancer care in ZIP Code 25005 and the surrounding area requires a comprehensive evaluation of primary care availability, specialist access, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and socioeconomic factors. A data-driven analysis, resulting in a Lung Cancer Score, is crucial for identifying strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement. This score will inform targeted interventions and ultimately enhance the quality of life for individuals affected by lung cancer.

For a visual representation of healthcare access, physician distribution, and other relevant data points within 25005 and Amma, explore the power of geographic data visualization. Visit CartoChrome maps to see how data can be transformed into actionable insights.