The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 25253, Letart, West Virginia is 42 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.87 percent of the residents in 25253 has some form of health insurance. 40.34 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.38 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25253 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 522 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25253. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 310 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 276 health care providers accessible to residents in 25253, Letart, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25253, Letart, West Virginia
| Lung Cancer Score | 42 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 54 |
| Provider Score | 42 |
| Hospital Score | 49 |
| Travel Score | 36 |
| 25253 | Letart | West Virginia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of lung cancer care within ZIP code 25253, focusing on the quality of physician services and primary care availability in Letart, requires a nuanced approach. Directly ranking physicians based on a "Lung Cancer Score" is complex, as it depends on numerous factors, including patient volume, practice specialization, and access to advanced treatments. However, we can analyze the landscape, considering key elements that contribute to successful lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and patient support.
The physician-to-patient ratio in 25253 is a crucial starting point. This ratio, encompassing both primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists (pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons), directly impacts access to care. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors for a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and potential setbacks in treatment initiation. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards would provide the most accurate figures. However, even without precise numbers, a general understanding of the area's demographics and healthcare infrastructure can provide insights. Rural areas often face physician shortages, which would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score.
Primary care availability in Letart is critical. PCPs serve as the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms suggestive of lung cancer, such as persistent cough, shortness of breath, or chest pain. Early detection is vital for improved outcomes. The availability of PCPs who are knowledgeable about lung cancer risk factors (smoking history, environmental exposures) and are proactive in screening (e.g., recommending low-dose CT scans for eligible individuals) significantly boosts the Lung Cancer Score. Letart's primary care infrastructure, including the presence of clinics, community health centers, and the number of PCPs accepting new patients, directly affects the community's ability to receive timely care.
Identifying standout practices within 25253 requires examining several aspects. Practices with a multidisciplinary approach, integrating pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists, are generally favored. This collaborative approach ensures patients receive comprehensive care, from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up. Practices with strong patient navigation programs, which assist patients in navigating the complex healthcare system, scheduling appointments, and coordinating care, also contribute positively to the score. Additionally, practices actively participating in clinical trials and offering access to cutting-edge treatments and therapies are highly regarded.
Telemedicine adoption is another important factor. Telemedicine, encompassing virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient education, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual appointments for follow-up visits, medication management, and even some initial consultations, can enhance the Lung Cancer Score. This technology can reduce travel burdens, improve patient convenience, and facilitate timely communication between patients and their healthcare providers.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical in lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. Access to support groups, counseling services, and psychiatric care can significantly improve a patient's quality of life and ability to cope with the physical and emotional challenges of lung cancer. The availability of these resources positively impacts the Lung Cancer Score.
To further assess the Lung Cancer Score, one would consider the availability of advanced diagnostic tools, such as advanced imaging capabilities (PET scans, MRI), and access to specialized treatment options, including targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and minimally invasive surgical techniques. Hospitals and clinics equipped with state-of-the-art technology and staffed by experienced specialists are more likely to provide a higher level of care. The presence of a dedicated lung cancer screening program, following established guidelines, also contributes positively to the score.
The analysis would also consider the practice's adherence to evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. This includes the use of national guidelines, such as those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) or the American Cancer Society (ACS). Practices that consistently follow these guidelines are more likely to provide high-quality care and achieve better patient outcomes.
Moreover, patient outcomes data, if available, would be a valuable indicator. Analyzing survival rates, recurrence rates, and patient satisfaction scores can provide insights into the effectiveness of care provided by different practices. However, obtaining this data can be challenging due to privacy concerns and the complexity of tracking patient outcomes.
The overall Lung Cancer Score is not a single number but a multifaceted assessment. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, primary care availability, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, access to advanced diagnostics and treatments, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines. A higher score reflects a healthcare environment that is better equipped to detect, diagnose, and treat lung cancer effectively, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.
For a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 25253 and Letart, including the geographic distribution of physicians, healthcare facilities, and demographic data, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of the area's healthcare resources, helping to identify potential gaps in care and opportunities for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like