The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 25437, Points, West Virginia is 7 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 25437 has some form of health insurance. 66.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25437 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 18 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25437. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 106 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 156 health care providers accessible to residents in 25437, Points, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25437, Points, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score | 18 |
---|---|
People Score | 54 |
Provider Score | 7 |
Hospital Score | 46 |
Travel Score | 34 |
25437 | Points | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 25437 & Primary Care Availability in Points
This analysis delves into the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 25437, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care, a critical element in early detection and management. We will assess the environment through the lens of a "Lung Cancer Score," considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of primary care accessibility. The analysis will also extend to the broader "Points" region, understanding how primary care availability in the surrounding area impacts the 25437 ZIP code.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on accessible and robust primary care. Early detection through screening, often initiated by a primary care physician, significantly improves patient outcomes. Therefore, the density and quality of primary care providers are paramount. In ZIP code 25437, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of primary care physicians, can lead to delayed appointments, reduced screening rates, and ultimately, poorer patient outcomes. Conversely, a high ratio suggests greater access, potentially facilitating earlier diagnosis and intervention. This ratio, however, is not the sole determinant of quality.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care practices within 25437 is essential. We need to identify standout practices. These practices might be characterized by their commitment to preventive care, including proactive lung cancer screening for eligible patients, adherence to national guidelines, and a patient-centered approach. They may also demonstrate a strong track record of successful early detection and referral for specialized care. Identifying these practices requires analyzing patient outcomes, screening rates, and patient satisfaction scores, if available.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication management, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The degree to which primary care practices in 25437 have embraced telemedicine is a key component of our Lung Cancer Score. Practices that readily utilize telemedicine can potentially improve patient adherence to treatment plans and facilitate timely communication with specialists.
The emotional toll of a lung cancer diagnosis is substantial. Mental health resources are therefore an integral part of comprehensive care. Primary care practices that offer or readily connect patients with mental health services, such as counseling or support groups, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient well-being. This includes the availability of on-site therapists, referrals to mental health specialists, and integration of mental health screenings into routine checkups. The integration of these resources is crucial for addressing the psychological challenges associated with diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship.
Extending the analysis to the broader "Points" region is vital. The availability of primary care in surrounding areas directly impacts the residents of 25437. Patients may travel to nearby towns or cities for care, especially if access is limited within their own ZIP code. Understanding the primary care landscape in Points, including physician density, practice quality, and telemedicine adoption, provides a more comprehensive picture of care accessibility for residents of 25437. This regional perspective considers the interconnectedness of healthcare systems and the impact of resource distribution across geographical boundaries.
A comprehensive Lung Cancer Score for 25437 would integrate all these factors. It would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices with proven screening and treatment protocols, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The score would also incorporate an assessment of primary care availability in the Points region, recognizing the impact of regional healthcare dynamics. This holistic approach provides a more accurate reflection of the lung cancer care environment.
The challenge lies in gathering and analyzing the necessary data. Information on physician-to-patient ratios can be obtained from state licensing boards and national databases. Identifying standout practices requires a multi-faceted approach, including reviewing patient outcomes data, screening rates, and patient satisfaction surveys. Telemedicine adoption rates can be assessed through surveys and practice websites. The availability of mental health resources can be determined by reviewing practice websites, patient resources, and local directories.
The Lung Cancer Score is not just a numerical ranking; it is a tool for understanding and improving the quality of lung cancer care. By identifying strengths and weaknesses, we can pinpoint areas for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding access to mental health resources. This analysis also serves as a guide for patients, helping them make informed decisions about their healthcare and identify practices that prioritize early detection and comprehensive care.
The ultimate goal is to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of lung cancer in 25437 and the surrounding region. By understanding the current state of primary care and identifying areas for improvement, we can work towards creating a healthcare environment that prioritizes early detection, comprehensive treatment, and holistic patient well-being. This requires a continuous effort to monitor, evaluate, and adapt to the evolving needs of the community.
The insights gained from this analysis can be further visualized and explored using advanced mapping tools. To gain a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of primary care resources, physician density, and other relevant factors, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps available on CartoChrome. These maps offer a powerful way to visualize the data, identify patterns, and make informed decisions about healthcare access and resource allocation.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like