25864, Layland, West Virginia Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 25864, Layland, West Virginia is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 25864 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25864 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25864. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 489 health care providers accessible to residents in 25864, Layland, West Virginia.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 25864 and Primary Care Availability in Layland**

Analyzing the availability of quality healthcare, specifically concerning lung cancer, within ZIP code 25864 (Layland, West Virginia) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized lung cancer care, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all factors influencing a patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment and recovery. The goal is to provide a comprehensive “Lung Cancer Score” assessment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement within this specific geographic area.

The foundation of any healthcare assessment lies in understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. In Layland, this metric is crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors relative to the population, can lead to appointment delays, reduced access to care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Publicly available data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources should be consulted to determine the exact population of Layland and the number of primary care physicians and specialists practicing within the ZIP code. This data forms the basis for calculating the ratio, providing a baseline for evaluating access to care. Furthermore, it's essential to differentiate between general practitioners and specialists, as the latter are critical for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Primary care availability is the initial point of contact for many patients. The presence of robust primary care practices is paramount. These practices should offer comprehensive services, including routine check-ups, screenings, and referrals to specialists. The quality of primary care in Layland can be assessed by examining the number of practices, the types of services offered, and the patient reviews. Reviews can highlight the patient experience, including wait times, the thoroughness of examinations, and the overall level of care provided.

Identifying standout practices within ZIP code 25864 is essential. This involves researching practices that demonstrate excellence in patient care, offer specialized services, and utilize advanced technologies. Practices that have implemented evidence-based screening protocols for lung cancer, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for high-risk individuals, are particularly valuable. Furthermore, practices that have affiliations with larger hospitals or cancer centers, offering access to a broader range of specialists and treatment options, should be considered.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor in the "Lung Cancer Score" analysis. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, especially in rural areas like Layland, by providing virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and access to specialists who may not be physically present in the community. The availability of telemedicine services, including the types of services offered (e.g., consultations, follow-up appointments), and the ease of access (e.g., user-friendly platforms, insurance coverage) should be evaluated. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can significantly improve the patient experience and reduce barriers to care.

The mental health of patients diagnosed with lung cancer is often overlooked, yet it's a crucial aspect of their overall well-being and recovery. The "Lung Cancer Score" must consider the availability of mental health resources within Layland. This includes the presence of therapists, counselors, and support groups specializing in oncology or chronic illness. Access to these resources can help patients cope with the emotional and psychological challenges associated with a cancer diagnosis and treatment. The availability of these resources and their integration into the overall care plan should be assessed.

The quality of care for lung cancer patients is also influenced by the availability of support services. These services may include patient navigators, who can help patients navigate the complex healthcare system, and financial assistance programs, which can help patients manage the costs of treatment. The presence of these resources should be considered in the overall assessment.

Data collection for this analysis requires a multi-pronged approach. Publicly available data from government agencies, such as the U.S. Census Bureau and the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, provides demographic information and physician data. Online resources, such as health insurance websites and doctor directories, offer information on practices and services. Patient reviews and testimonials provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Direct contact with healthcare providers can provide additional information on services, technologies, and affiliations.

The "Lung Cancer Score" can be visualized using a scoring system, with different factors weighted according to their importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of specialists, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources could each be assigned a specific weight. The overall score can then be used to rank the quality of care available in Layland.

The analysis should also identify areas for improvement. This may include increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding the availability of specialized lung cancer care, promoting telemedicine adoption, and improving access to mental health resources. The recommendations should be specific and actionable, providing a roadmap for improving the quality of care for lung cancer patients in Layland.

In conclusion, evaluating the "Lung Cancer Score" for ZIP code 25864 is a complex undertaking. It necessitates a thorough examination of physician-to-patient ratios, primary care availability, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. By carefully analyzing these factors and developing a comprehensive scoring system, we can gain a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in Layland and identify areas for improvement.

To further explore the healthcare landscape in Layland and visualize the data discussed, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide valuable insights into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, allowing for a more in-depth understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing the community.