25928, Stephenson, West Virginia Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 25928, Stephenson, West Virginia is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.92 percent of the residents in 25928 has some form of health insurance. 64.60 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.63 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25928 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 15 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25928. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 156 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 188 health care providers accessible to residents in 25928, Stephenson, West Virginia.

The analysis focuses on providing an informed perspective on lung cancer care within ZIP code 25928, Stephenson, West Virginia, while also evaluating the availability of primary care services in the broader Stephenson area. This assessment considers factors crucial for patient well-being, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and mental health support. It aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape, particularly concerning lung cancer, and how readily accessible and effective the care is for residents.

The foundation of any healthcare assessment lies in the physician-to-patient ratio. In 25928, and indeed throughout Stephenson County, this metric requires careful scrutiny. Rural areas often face challenges in recruiting and retaining physicians, potentially leading to a lower ratio compared to urban centers. This can translate into longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to specialized care, and an increased burden on existing primary care physicians. Determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio requires accessing publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards. This data, coupled with local population figures, provides a baseline understanding of the availability of medical professionals. The analysis must also account for the specialties of these physicians, as a high number of general practitioners does not necessarily translate to readily available oncologists or pulmonologists, who are critical in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.

The quality of primary care practices is another critical element. This involves evaluating factors such as the accreditation of medical facilities, the use of electronic health records (EHRs), and the adoption of evidence-based practices. Practices that are accredited by recognized organizations, such as the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) or the Joint Commission, often demonstrate a commitment to quality and patient safety. The implementation of EHRs streamlines patient care by providing physicians with quick access to patient histories, test results, and medication information. It also facilitates communication between different healthcare providers, which is essential for coordinated care, especially in complex cases like lung cancer. Furthermore, the adherence to evidence-based guidelines in diagnosis and treatment is crucial for ensuring that patients receive the most effective and up-to-date care.

Identifying standout practices within the area requires a deeper dive into their specific services and performance. This involves looking at factors such as the experience and specialization of the physicians, the availability of advanced diagnostic equipment (e.g., CT scanners, bronchoscopes), and the practice’s involvement in clinical trials or research. Practices that have a dedicated pulmonologist or oncologist on staff are particularly valuable for lung cancer patients. The ability to perform diagnostic procedures on-site can also significantly improve patient convenience and reduce delays in diagnosis. Practices that are actively involved in clinical trials provide patients with access to cutting-edge treatments and contribute to advancements in cancer care. Patient reviews and testimonials, while subjective, can also provide valuable insights into the patient experience.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to access healthcare services remotely, which can be especially beneficial for those who live far from medical facilities or have mobility issues. The availability of telehealth appointments for primary care visits, follow-up appointments, and consultations with specialists can significantly improve access to care. The use of telehealth for lung cancer patients can also extend to remote monitoring of symptoms, medication management, and access to support groups. The extent to which local practices have embraced telemedicine, including the platforms they use and the types of services they offer, is an important indicator of their commitment to patient care.

The integration of mental health resources is also vital. A lung cancer diagnosis can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. Access to mental health services, such as counseling, therapy, and support groups, is crucial for helping patients cope with the stress, anxiety, and depression that often accompany a cancer diagnosis. Practices that have integrated mental health services into their care model, either through on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, can also provide patients with a valuable sense of community and support.

The overall assessment of lung cancer care in 25928 and primary care availability in Stephenson requires synthesizing all these factors. The final "Lung Cancer Score" would not be a simple numerical value, but rather a comprehensive evaluation that considers the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape. This evaluation would highlight areas where the healthcare system excels and areas where improvements are needed. It would identify the practices that are leading the way in providing high-quality care and those that may need to enhance their services. The goal is to provide residents with a clear understanding of the resources available to them and empower them to make informed decisions about their healthcare.

In conclusion, the healthcare landscape in 25928 and Stephenson presents both opportunities and challenges. The availability of physicians, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources all play critical roles in the care of lung cancer patients and the overall health of the community. To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare resources available in the area, including the locations of medical facilities, physician specialties, and other relevant data, consider exploring the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome.