The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 26320, Alma, West Virginia is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.03 percent of the residents in 26320 has some form of health insurance. 52.46 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.04 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26320 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 78 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26320. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 108 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 92 health care providers accessible to residents in 26320, Alma, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26320, Alma, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score | 55 |
---|---|
People Score | 93 |
Provider Score | 23 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 30 |
26320 | Alma | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 26320 & Primary Care in Alma
This analysis focuses on assessing the landscape of lung cancer care within the context of primary care availability in Alma, West Virginia, specifically considering the doctors practicing within ZIP code 26320. The goal is to create a “Lung Cancer Score” analysis, evaluating factors that impact a patient's journey from potential symptom recognition to diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care. This will include physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests heavily on accessible and quality primary care. Early detection is paramount, and primary care physicians (PCPs) often serve as the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. Therefore, the availability of PCPs in Alma, and their capacity to provide timely and comprehensive care, is a crucial factor. The physician-to-patient ratio is a key metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Data regarding Alma's specific PCP-to-patient ratio, ideally obtained from local health departments or state medical boards, will be instrumental in this scoring.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality and characteristics of primary care practices within and serving ZIP code 26320 are critical. Are practices accepting new patients? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments to accommodate diverse schedules? Do they have electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate seamless communication and information sharing with specialists, including pulmonologists and oncologists? The presence of EHRs is particularly important for tracking patient history, ordering necessary screenings (like low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals), and ensuring timely referrals.
Standout practices, if any, within the area should be highlighted. This involves identifying clinics or individual physicians who demonstrate excellence in patient care, perhaps through patient reviews, awards, or affiliations with reputable hospitals or cancer centers. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs related to lung cancer awareness and prevention would also receive favorable consideration. This could include offering smoking cessation programs or educational seminars.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. Telemedicine, particularly in rural areas like Alma, can bridge geographical barriers and improve access to care. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals can significantly enhance the patient experience. Telemedicine can facilitate follow-up appointments, medication management, and even mental health support, all of which are essential components of comprehensive lung cancer care. The extent to which practices in 26320 have embraced telemedicine, and the types of services they offer remotely, will influence the Lung Cancer Score.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but vital component of lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis, and the subsequent treatment, can be incredibly stressful and emotionally taxing. Patients may experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, is therefore critical. Practices that have integrated mental health services into their care models, or that have established strong referral networks with mental health providers, will be viewed more favorably. The presence of support groups, both in-person and online, can also provide valuable emotional support and peer-to-peer connection.
The specific diagnostic capabilities available within the region are also relevant. Does the area have access to advanced imaging technologies, such as PET scans and advanced CT scanners? Are there pulmonologists and oncologists readily available for consultation and treatment? The proximity and accessibility of these specialists are essential for timely diagnosis and treatment. The presence of a dedicated cancer center or a hospital with a strong oncology program would significantly enhance the score.
The Lung Cancer Score will be constructed based on a weighted system, assigning points to each of the aforementioned factors. Physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability will each contribute to the overall score. The weighting will reflect the relative importance of each factor in ensuring access to quality lung cancer care. The final score will provide a comparative assessment of the landscape of lung cancer care within the specified area.
Data collection will be critical to the accuracy of this analysis. This will involve gathering information from various sources, including local health departments, state medical boards, hospital websites, practice websites, and patient reviews. The accuracy and completeness of the data will directly impact the reliability of the Lung Cancer Score.
The Lung Cancer Score is not simply a numerical ranking. It's a tool designed to provide a comprehensive overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem in 26320, specifically as it relates to lung cancer care. This information can be used by patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare, by healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement, and by policymakers to allocate resources effectively.
The analysis will also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on access to care. Factors such as insurance coverage, transportation options, and literacy levels can all influence a patient's ability to receive timely and appropriate care. The Lung Cancer Score will attempt to account for these factors, recognizing that healthcare disparities can exist within even relatively small geographic areas.
The ultimate goal is to provide a clear and concise assessment of the state of lung cancer care in the specified area. This assessment will serve as a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike. The final score will be a dynamic measure, reflecting the ever-changing landscape of healthcare and the ongoing efforts to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer.
To further explore the healthcare landscape in 26320 and Alma, including the locations of healthcare providers, hospitals, and other relevant facilities, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps offer a visual representation of the area, allowing you to easily identify and compare healthcare resources.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like