The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 26430, Sand Fork, West Virginia is 35 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 19.94 percent of the residents in 26430 has some form of health insurance. 11.47 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 10.81 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26430 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 76 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26430. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 24 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 493 health care providers accessible to residents in 26430, Sand Fork, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26430, Sand Fork, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score | 46 |
---|---|
People Score | 87 |
Provider Score | 35 |
Hospital Score | 44 |
Travel Score | 21 |
26430 | Sand Fork | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 26430, coupled with the assessment of primary care resources in Sand Fork, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This evaluation considers the crucial elements impacting patient outcomes, including physician availability, the integration of technology, and the availability of supportive services like mental health care. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape in this specific region, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
The foundation of any healthcare system is the availability of primary care physicians. In Sand Fork, understanding the physician-to-patient ratio is critical. This ratio indicates the accessibility of primary care, the first point of contact for many individuals experiencing symptoms suggestive of lung cancer. A low ratio, meaning a smaller number of physicians serving a larger population, can lead to delayed diagnoses and treatment. This delay significantly impacts the prognosis for lung cancer patients, as early detection is paramount for successful intervention. Publicly available data from the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, or similar local sources, would be essential to calculate this ratio accurately.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians within Sand Fork is equally important. Are physicians concentrated in one specific area, or are they geographically dispersed, serving the needs of the entire community? This spatial analysis can reveal potential healthcare deserts where access to care is limited. Furthermore, the types of primary care practices available must be considered. Are there solo practitioners, or are there larger group practices? Group practices often offer a broader range of services and may have better resources to support patients with complex conditions like lung cancer.
The presence of specialists within or near ZIP Code 26430 is also a significant factor. While primary care physicians are the initial point of contact, the timely referral to pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons is crucial for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. The proximity of these specialists, and the efficiency of the referral process, directly influence patient outcomes. Travel time to specialist appointments can be a significant burden for patients, especially those undergoing treatment.
Technological advancements are transforming healthcare, and their adoption within the region is a key indicator of the quality of care. Telemedicine, in particular, has the potential to improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas. The availability of telehealth consultations with primary care physicians and specialists can reduce travel time and provide convenient access to medical expertise. The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) also plays a vital role in care coordination. EHRs allow for seamless information sharing between different healthcare providers, ensuring that all members of the care team are informed about the patient's medical history, treatment plan, and progress.
The adoption of advanced diagnostic tools, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, is another crucial element. LDCT screening is recommended for individuals at high risk for lung cancer, and its availability can significantly improve early detection rates. Assessing the availability of these screenings, and the awareness of them among primary care physicians, is vital.
Mental health support is an often-overlooked but critical aspect of cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be incredibly stressful, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is essential for patients' overall well-being. Assessing the accessibility of these resources within the community, and the integration of mental health services into the overall care plan, is a crucial component of this analysis.
Identifying standout practices within ZIP Code 26430 requires a deeper dive into their services and patient outcomes. This could involve reviewing patient testimonials, analyzing data on cancer survival rates, and assessing the practices' commitment to patient-centered care. Practices that prioritize patient education, provide comprehensive support services, and actively participate in community outreach initiatives are likely to be better equipped to serve the needs of lung cancer patients.
Data collection and analysis are essential for a comprehensive assessment. This could involve gathering information from various sources, including healthcare providers, hospitals, public health agencies, and patient advocacy groups. Analyzing this data will help to identify areas of strength and weakness in the local healthcare system.
The specific challenges and opportunities in Sand Fork and ZIP Code 26430 may vary. For example, limited access to transportation might be a significant barrier to care. Addressing these challenges requires a collaborative effort involving healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government agencies. This collaboration is essential to ensure that all residents have access to high-quality lung cancer care.
The analysis must also consider the socioeconomic factors influencing health outcomes. Poverty, lack of education, and limited access to healthy food options can all contribute to poorer health outcomes, including a higher risk of lung cancer. Addressing these social determinants of health is crucial for improving the overall health of the community.
In conclusion, a thorough assessment of lung cancer care in ZIP Code 26430 and primary care availability in Sand Fork requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician availability, technological integration, mental health resources, and socioeconomic factors. This analysis should identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement to ensure that all residents have access to high-quality lung cancer care.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in this area, including physician locations, specialist availability, and potential healthcare deserts, explore the power of spatial data with CartoChrome maps. Visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare access in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like