Lung Cancer Score

26542, Masontown, West Virginia Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 26542, Masontown, West Virginia

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 26542, Masontown, West Virginia is 97 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.27 percent of the residents in 26542 has some form of health insurance. 43.09 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26542 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 370 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 59 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26542. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 530 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,723 health care providers accessible to residents in 26542, Masontown, West Virginia.

Health Scores in 26542, Masontown, West Virginia

Lung Cancer Score 90
People Score 71
Provider Score 97
Hospital Score 45
Travel Score 49

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

26542 Masontown West Virginia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 26542, Masontown, West Virginia

The analysis focuses on lung cancer care accessibility within ZIP Code 26542, specifically evaluating the availability and quality of primary care, a crucial entry point for early detection and management. Masontown, West Virginia, within this ZIP code, presents a unique healthcare landscape that requires careful scrutiny.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests upon robust primary care. In Masontown, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. The specific physician-to-patient ratio for 26542 needs to be determined through data analysis. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources should be consulted. This ratio provides a baseline understanding of access.

Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians matters. Are the existing doctors clustered in one area, leaving others underserved? Geographic information systems (GIS) mapping, particularly through tools like CartoChrome, can illuminate these disparities. This mapping can reveal "healthcare deserts" – areas with limited or no access to primary care. The presence of these deserts necessitates a focus on outreach programs or mobile clinics to bridge the gap.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can be a game-changer in rural areas like Masontown. It can connect patients with specialists, provide follow-up care, and offer educational resources. The extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care practices in 26542 should be assessed. Are practices utilizing telehealth platforms for virtual consultations? Are they offering remote monitoring for patients with chronic conditions, including those at risk for or undergoing treatment for lung cancer? The level of telehealth integration directly impacts the accessibility and convenience of care.

Mental health resources are inextricably linked to lung cancer care. A diagnosis of lung cancer can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health support within the primary care setting is therefore paramount. Does the primary care practice have a psychiatrist or psychologist on staff, or do they have established referral pathways to mental health professionals? The presence of mental health integration, or its absence, significantly impacts the overall well-being of patients.

Identifying standout practices is essential. These are the primary care providers that are excelling in providing comprehensive lung cancer care. They might demonstrate excellence in early detection through proactive screening programs, such as offering lung cancer screenings to eligible patients based on age and smoking history. They may also excel in patient education, providing clear and concise information about the disease, treatment options, and support resources. Furthermore, they might have a strong track record of coordinating care with specialists, ensuring seamless transitions between primary care and oncology services.

To identify these standout practices, a multi-faceted approach is required. Patient reviews and testimonials, if available, can offer valuable insights into the patient experience. Data on patient outcomes, such as the rate of early-stage diagnoses, can also be informative, though accessing this data may be challenging. Collaboration with local healthcare organizations and community groups can also help identify practices that are making a positive impact.

Furthermore, the integration of patient navigators is a key element of excellent care. Patient navigators act as guides, helping patients navigate the complex healthcare system. They can assist with appointment scheduling, insurance paperwork, and accessing support services. The presence of patient navigators in primary care practices can significantly improve the patient experience and reduce the burden on both patients and physicians.

The overall quality of care is also influenced by the availability of support groups and resources for patients and their families. Support groups provide a safe space for patients to share their experiences, connect with others facing similar challenges, and receive emotional support. The availability of these resources, whether offered directly by the primary care practice or through referrals, is a critical component of comprehensive lung cancer care.

The analysis should also consider the financial aspects of care. The cost of healthcare can be a significant barrier to access, particularly for individuals with limited financial resources. The primary care practices in 26542 should be assessed for their acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid. The availability of financial assistance programs for patients who are unable to afford their care is also an important consideration.

Moreover, the analysis should consider the cultural competency of the healthcare providers. The ability to communicate effectively with patients from diverse backgrounds and to provide culturally sensitive care is essential. This includes being aware of cultural beliefs and practices that may influence a patient's approach to healthcare. The primary care practices in 26542 should be assessed for their commitment to providing culturally competent care.

Finally, the long-term sustainability of primary care in Masontown is a crucial consideration. The recruitment and retention of qualified healthcare professionals is essential to ensure that primary care services remain available in the community. The analysis should consider the factors that may be impacting the ability of primary care practices to attract and retain physicians and other healthcare professionals.

In conclusion, assessing the availability and quality of lung cancer care in Masontown requires a comprehensive approach. The physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, standout practices, and the availability of patient support systems all play vital roles. To visualize the geographical distribution of primary care physicians, identify healthcare deserts, and assess the proximity of patients to healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can offer a visual representation of the data, enabling a more in-depth understanding of the healthcare landscape in 26542.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 26542, Masontown, West Virginia

You may also like

26547, Reedsville, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 3.61 Miles

Total Population:

26520, Arthurdale, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 4.64 Miles

Total Population:

26508, Morgantown, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 7.53 Miles

Total Population:

26537, Kingwood, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 8.62 Miles

Total Population:

26519, Albright, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 9.38 Miles

Total Population:

26505, Morgantown, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 10.37 Miles

Total Population:

26501, Morgantown, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 11.04 Miles

Total Population:

26534, Granville, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 11.96 Miles

Total Population:

26543, Osage, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 26542: 13.34 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 26542, Masontown, West Virginia