The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 26572, Four States, West Virginia is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 26572 has some form of health insurance. 69.86 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 34.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26572 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 204 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26572. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 11 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 840 health care providers accessible to residents in 26572, Four States, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26572, Four States, West Virginia
Lung Cancer Score | 69 |
---|---|
People Score | 56 |
Provider Score | 59 |
Hospital Score | 58 |
Travel Score | 47 |
26572 | Four States | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The following analysis assesses the quality of lung cancer care and primary care availability in ZIP code 26572, focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. This evaluation also considers the broader context of primary care availability across four states, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape.
ZIP code 26572, Morgantown, West Virginia, presents a unique healthcare environment. Situated near West Virginia University, the area benefits from a significant concentration of medical professionals and research facilities. However, the rural nature of the surrounding areas presents challenges in terms of access to care, particularly for specialized services like lung cancer treatment.
Physician-to-patient ratios in this region are a crucial indicator of access. While Morgantown itself likely boasts a favorable ratio due to the presence of the university hospital and affiliated clinics, this doesn’t necessarily translate to equitable access for all residents of the ZIP code. Rural areas surrounding Morgantown often experience shortages of primary care physicians, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment for conditions like lung cancer. This disparity highlights the need for strategies to improve access, such as incentivizing physicians to practice in underserved areas.
Identifying standout practices requires a nuanced approach. While quantitative metrics like patient volume and survival rates are important, qualitative factors also play a significant role. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, including comprehensive screening programs, multidisciplinary treatment teams, and robust patient education, deserve recognition. Furthermore, practices actively involved in clinical trials and research contribute to advancements in lung cancer treatment, offering patients access to cutting-edge therapies.
Telemedicine adoption is a critical factor in improving access to care, especially for patients in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with specialists, receive follow-up care, and participate in educational programs without the need for extensive travel. The availability of telemedicine services, including video consultations, remote monitoring, and digital health tools, can significantly improve outcomes for lung cancer patients by facilitating early detection, timely intervention, and ongoing support. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies and integrated them seamlessly into their workflows are better positioned to serve a wider patient population.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are essential for patients undergoing lung cancer treatment. The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer can be emotionally and psychologically challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. Access to mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors, is vital for providing patients with the support they need to cope with their illness and maintain their quality of life. Practices that offer integrated mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health providers are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients.
Considering the four-state context, the analysis should extend beyond the immediate Morgantown area. West Virginia, along with neighboring states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Maryland, may present varying levels of primary care availability and lung cancer care quality. Examining the healthcare infrastructure across these states provides a broader perspective on the challenges and opportunities in improving access to care and patient outcomes. This includes assessing the density of specialists, the availability of advanced treatment modalities, and the implementation of evidence-based screening programs.
The presence of teaching hospitals and research institutions in the four-state region often drives innovation and improves the quality of care. These institutions contribute to advancements in lung cancer treatment through clinical trials, research studies, and the training of future healthcare professionals. Patients in areas served by these institutions may have access to cutting-edge therapies and a higher level of expertise.
The availability of support groups and patient advocacy organizations is another crucial aspect of the healthcare landscape. These organizations provide patients with emotional support, educational resources, and a sense of community. They also play a vital role in advocating for policies that improve access to care and promote lung cancer awareness. Practices that partner with these organizations can enhance their ability to provide comprehensive care and support to their patients.
In assessing the quality of lung cancer care, it is important to consider the entire patient journey, from screening and diagnosis to treatment and survivorship. This includes evaluating the effectiveness of screening programs, the timeliness of diagnosis, the availability of advanced treatment options, and the quality of supportive care services. Practices that excel in all these areas are best positioned to provide patients with the best possible outcomes.
The analysis of telemedicine adoption should consider not only the availability of telehealth services but also the infrastructure and support needed to ensure their effective use. This includes providing patients with access to technology, training them on how to use telehealth platforms, and ensuring that telehealth services are integrated seamlessly into the care delivery process.
The assessment of mental health resources should consider the availability of both individual and group therapy options, as well as the integration of mental health services into the primary care setting. This can help to ensure that patients receive the mental health support they need in a timely and convenient manner.
Finally, the analysis should consider the impact of social determinants of health on patient outcomes. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and cultural beliefs can significantly influence a patient's ability to access and benefit from healthcare services. Addressing these social determinants of health is essential for ensuring that all patients have an equal opportunity to receive high-quality care.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 26572 and the surrounding four states, and to visualize the distribution of resources and identify areas of need, consider exploring the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. Their platform offers a powerful tool for analyzing healthcare data and making informed decisions about improving access to care and patient outcomes.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like