35004, Moody, Alabama Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 35004, Moody, Alabama is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.25 percent of the residents in 35004 has some form of health insurance. 31.98 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35004 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,678 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35004. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,003 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,155 health care providers accessible to residents in 35004, Moody, Alabama.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Moody, Alabama (ZIP Code 35004)

Analyzing the overall health landscape within Moody, Alabama (ZIP Code 35004) requires a multifaceted approach, considering not only the number of physicians but also the accessibility of care, the integration of technology, and the availability of crucial mental health resources. This analysis aims to provide an "Overall Health Score" assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.

One of the most fundamental metrics is the physician-to-patient ratio. Determining this ratio necessitates data from sources like the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners and the U.S. Census Bureau. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of physicians, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests a more readily available healthcare workforce. Research is required to pinpoint the exact ratio within 35004, comparing it to both state and national averages to contextualize its significance.

Assessing primary care availability is another critical component. This involves identifying the number of family medicine, internal medicine, and general practice physicians actively practicing within the ZIP code. Furthermore, the acceptance of new patients by these providers is a key indicator. Practices that are consistently accepting new patients signal a healthy and accessible healthcare system. Conversely, a scarcity of available primary care providers can force residents to seek care outside of their community, potentially leading to fragmented care and increased travel burdens.

Identifying standout practices within Moody is crucial. These practices often serve as benchmarks for quality of care and patient satisfaction. This requires analyzing factors like patient reviews, accreditation status (e.g., from organizations like the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care), and the range of services offered. Practices that prioritize preventative care, offer extended hours, and demonstrate a commitment to patient education are likely to receive higher ratings. Understanding the operational models, staffing levels, and patient demographics of these standout practices can provide valuable insights into best practices within the community.

The adoption of telemedicine is rapidly changing healthcare delivery, particularly in rural areas like Moody. Telemedicine allows patients to access consultations, follow-up appointments, and even remote monitoring services without the need for in-person visits. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within 35004 requires examining which practices offer virtual appointments, the types of services provided via telemedicine, and the patient populations who are utilizing these services. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas.

The availability of mental health resources is a vital aspect of overall health. This involves identifying the number of psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed professional counselors, and other mental health professionals practicing within the community. Furthermore, understanding the accessibility of these resources is critical. Are there long wait times for appointments? Are mental health services covered by local insurance plans? Do any practices offer specialized programs, such as therapy for children or support groups for specific conditions? A robust mental health infrastructure is essential for addressing the complex needs of the community and promoting overall well-being.

Beyond the number of providers, the quality of care is paramount. This involves analyzing patient outcomes, such as rates of chronic disease management, preventative screening rates, and patient satisfaction scores. Data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) can provide insights into the quality of care provided by local practices. Furthermore, understanding the healthcare system's responsiveness to patient needs, including the availability of language services and culturally sensitive care, is essential for ensuring equitable access to quality healthcare.

Analyzing the insurance landscape within 35004 is another crucial factor. The percentage of insured residents, the types of insurance plans accepted by local providers, and the availability of affordable healthcare options all impact access to care. Communities with high rates of uninsurance or underinsurance may experience poorer health outcomes due to delayed or avoided care. Understanding the complexities of the insurance landscape can help identify potential barriers to care and inform strategies for improving access.

The overall health score for Moody (35004) is not a static number but rather a dynamic assessment that reflects the interplay of numerous factors. A comprehensive analysis requires gathering data from various sources, including public health agencies, healthcare providers, and patient surveys. By combining these data points, it's possible to develop a nuanced understanding of the community's health landscape.

The final "Overall Health Score" would be a composite measure, considering the physician-to-patient ratio, primary care availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resource accessibility, quality of care indicators, and insurance coverage rates. This score could be presented on a scale (e.g., 1-10 or a letter grade) with clear explanations of the methodology and data sources used. The score should also be accompanied by specific recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, or enhancing mental health resources.

Ultimately, the goal is to create a data-driven assessment that empowers residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers to make informed decisions about improving the health and well-being of the Moody community. This analysis serves as a starting point for a more comprehensive understanding of the local healthcare system.

To visualize and explore the healthcare landscape of Moody, Alabama, and beyond, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data, allowing you to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare ecosystem.