Overall Health Score

35052, Cook Springs, Alabama Overall Health Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 35052, Cook Springs, Alabama

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 35052, Cook Springs, Alabama is 41 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 52.23 percent of the residents in 35052 has some form of health insurance. 52.23 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35052 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35052. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 62 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 518 health care providers accessible to residents in 35052, Cook Springs, Alabama.

Health Scores in 35052, Cook Springs, Alabama

Overall Health Score 59
People Score 89
Provider Score 41
Hospital Score 40
Travel Score 35

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

35052 Cook Springs Alabama
Providers per 10,000 residents 30,758.93 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 48,561.15 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 35052, Cook Springs, Alabama

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in Cook Springs (ZIP Code 35052)

Assessing the overall health landscape within Cook Springs, Alabama, specifically focusing on doctors practicing within the 35052 ZIP code, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This evaluation aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare accessibility and quality available to the residents of this community.

The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental indicator of healthcare accessibility. While precise, up-to-the-minute figures fluctuate, analyzing publicly available data, including state licensing boards and national databases, provides a reasonable estimate. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a higher concentration of doctors per capita, generally suggests better access to care. Conversely, a high ratio may indicate potential challenges in securing timely appointments, especially for primary care services. The rural nature of Cook Springs and the broader St. Clair County area often presents challenges in attracting and retaining physicians, which may influence the physician-to-patient ratio.

Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several factors. These include the types of services offered, patient reviews, and the presence of specialized care. Practices that offer a broad range of services, including preventative care, chronic disease management, and specialty referrals, are generally considered more comprehensive. Patient reviews provide valuable insights into the patient experience, including wait times, communication with providers, and overall satisfaction. Practices with a strong reputation for patient care and positive outcomes contribute significantly to the overall health score.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of the healthcare landscape. The ability to access healthcare services remotely, through video conferencing or phone consultations, can significantly improve access, particularly for individuals in rural areas. Telemedicine can reduce travel time, minimize the need for time off work, and provide access to specialists who may not be readily available locally. Evaluating the extent to which practices in 35052 have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered remotely and the ease of use for patients, is a key component of this analysis.

Mental health resources are a crucial element of overall well-being. Access to mental health services, including therapy, counseling, and psychiatric care, is essential for addressing a wide range of conditions. Assessing the availability of mental health providers, the presence of support groups, and the integration of mental health services into primary care practices is critical. The availability of these resources, or lack thereof, significantly impacts the overall health score.

Specific data points will be gathered from various sources. These will include state medical board directories, online physician databases, and patient review platforms. Information regarding telemedicine adoption will be gleaned from practice websites and direct inquiries. Mental health resource availability will be assessed through searches of local mental health organizations and community service providers.

Based on available information, the health score for doctors in 35052 will be assessed. If the physician-to-patient ratio is high, it will negatively affect the score. The presence of comprehensive, well-regarded primary care practices will positively impact the score. Widespread telemedicine adoption will also improve the score, while limited adoption will have a negative effect. The availability of mental health resources, including both providers and support services, will be a key factor.

The analysis will likely reveal challenges and opportunities. The rural nature of the area may result in a higher physician-to-patient ratio than in more urban areas. The presence of a few well-regarded primary care practices could provide a strong foundation of care. The adoption of telemedicine could be a significant factor in improving access to care, particularly for those with mobility issues or who live far from medical facilities. The availability of mental health resources is a critical area for evaluation, as access to these services is often limited in rural communities.

The final health score will be a composite of these factors. It will reflect the overall accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of healthcare services available to residents of Cook Springs. The analysis will not only provide a snapshot of the current state of healthcare in the area but also highlight areas where improvements are needed. This will include a discussion of specific challenges and potential solutions.

For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is high, strategies to attract and retain physicians, such as offering financial incentives or supporting loan repayment programs, could be considered. If telemedicine adoption is limited, initiatives to encourage its use, such as providing training and technical support to practices, could be beneficial. If mental health resources are lacking, partnerships with mental health organizations and the expansion of telehealth services could improve access.

The overall health score is not a static measure. It is subject to change based on various factors, including population growth, changes in healthcare policies, and the evolution of medical practices. Regular reassessments are essential to monitor progress and identify areas where further improvements are needed. This analysis is a starting point for understanding the healthcare landscape in Cook Springs and for informing efforts to improve the health and well-being of its residents.

To visualize the healthcare landscape and gain a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources in Cook Springs and the surrounding areas, explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide valuable insights into physician locations, clinic locations, and the availability of various healthcare services.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 35052, Cook Springs, Alabama

You may also like

35004, Moody, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 5.54 Miles

Total Population:

35054, Cropwell, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 8.17 Miles

Total Population:

35094, Leeds, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 9.75 Miles

Total Population:

35096, Lincoln, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 15.70 Miles

Total Population:

35014, Alpine, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 16.64 Miles

Total Population:

35078, Harpersville, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 17.80 Miles

Total Population:

35044, Childersburg, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 22.34 Miles

Total Population:

35032, Bon Air, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 23.00 Miles

Total Population:

35013, Allgood, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35052: 23.21 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 35052, Cook Springs, Alabama