35477, Panola, Alabama Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 35477, Panola, Alabama is 5 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 81.02 percent of the residents in 35477 has some form of health insurance. 67.15 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 13.87 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35477 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 48 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35477. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 12 health care providers accessible to residents in 35477, Panola, Alabama.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 35477 and Primary Care in Panola

This analysis assesses the overall health landscape for residents of ZIP Code 35477, focusing on physician availability and the broader primary care infrastructure, with a comparative look at the situation in Panola. We will evaluate key factors including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This comprehensive review aims to provide a clear picture of the healthcare access and quality available in these areas.

ZIP Code 35477, located in Alabama, presents a unique healthcare environment. Determining an exact, real-time physician-to-patient ratio is challenging due to fluctuating population data and physician movements. However, publicly available data, combined with insights from healthcare directories and local reports, allows us to estimate the current situation. The ratio, when compared to national averages, appears to be a concern. This implies a potential shortage of primary care physicians, which can lead to longer wait times for appointments, increased pressure on existing doctors, and potentially reduced access to preventative care.

Analyzing the presence of standout practices involves evaluating factors beyond simple physician counts. We consider the quality of care delivered, patient satisfaction scores, the range of services offered, and the adoption of innovative technologies. Practices that have earned recognition from patient reviews, professional organizations, or regional healthcare awards are considered standout examples. The presence of such practices can significantly impact the overall health score, as they often set a benchmark for quality and innovation within the community.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial indicator of healthcare accessibility. The ability to consult with a physician remotely, through video or phone calls, can be a game-changer, particularly for residents in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The degree to which practices in 35477 have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered remotely and the ease of access for patients, is a key factor in our assessment. Widespread telemedicine adoption can offset some of the challenges posed by a potentially low physician-to-patient ratio.

Mental health resources are an integral part of overall health. The availability of psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, and mental health support groups within the community directly impacts the well-being of residents. Assessing the presence of these resources, as well as their accessibility and affordability, is a critical component of our evaluation. A lack of adequate mental health support can negatively impact the overall health score, potentially leading to increased rates of chronic disease, substance abuse, and other health issues.

Now, let's shift the focus to primary care availability in Panola. While a direct comparison of physician-to-patient ratios between 35477 and Panola is difficult without specific data, we can evaluate the broader healthcare infrastructure. This includes the presence of primary care clinics, urgent care facilities, and community health centers. The number of healthcare providers, their geographic distribution, and their ability to serve the local population are essential factors in determining the overall health score.

The presence of standout practices in Panola, similar to 35477, is also considered. This involves evaluating the quality of care, patient satisfaction, and the adoption of innovative technologies. The presence of such practices can significantly improve the health score for the area.

Telemedicine adoption in Panola is another crucial factor. The availability of remote consultations can greatly increase healthcare accessibility, especially for those in remote areas. The degree to which practices in Panola have embraced telemedicine is a key consideration in our assessment.

Mental health resources in Panola are also an integral part of the overall health score. Assessing the presence of psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, and mental health support groups within the community is a critical component of our evaluation. A lack of adequate mental health support can negatively impact the overall health score.

To provide a more nuanced understanding, we must also consider the socio-economic factors that influence health outcomes. These include income levels, educational attainment, access to healthy food options, and the availability of safe housing. These factors can significantly impact the health of residents, and they must be considered in any comprehensive health analysis.

The overall health score for 35477 and Panola is a complex metric that is influenced by a multitude of factors. While a definitive numerical score is beyond the scope of this analysis, we can offer a qualitative assessment based on the available data. The physician-to-patient ratio in 35477 appears to be a concern, potentially leading to access challenges. The adoption of telemedicine and the availability of mental health resources are crucial areas for improvement. In Panola, the evaluation focuses on the broader primary care infrastructure, including the number and distribution of healthcare providers, and the presence of telemedicine and mental health resources. The socio-economic factors in both areas play a crucial role in the overall health outcomes.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in these areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. Their interactive platform allows you to visualize healthcare data, identify areas with limited access, and analyze the distribution of resources. By utilizing their maps, you can gain a more comprehensive and data-driven understanding of the health challenges and opportunities within 35477 and Panola.