The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 35619, Danville, Alabama is 39 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.60 percent of the residents in 35619 has some form of health insurance. 37.66 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.39 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35619 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,096 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35619. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 796 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,923 health care providers accessible to residents in 35619, Danville, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35619, Danville, Alabama
Overall Health Score | 34 |
---|---|
People Score | 63 |
Provider Score | 39 |
Hospital Score | 20 |
Travel Score | 48 |
35619 | Danville | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 771.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 3,351.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 4,510.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Danville, Alabama (ZIP Code 35619)
Analyzing the overall health score for Danville, Alabama, specifically focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians, requires a multifaceted approach. We will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and examine the availability of mental health resources. This analysis will provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 35619.
The foundation of any health score assessment lies in understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric reveals the accessibility of primary care. In Danville, a rural area, this ratio is likely to be a critical factor. Researching the precise number of primary care physicians practicing within the ZIP code, alongside the population of Danville, will establish the initial baseline. A higher ratio, indicating fewer patients per physician, generally suggests better access. Conversely, a lower ratio signals potential challenges in securing timely appointments and receiving adequate care. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and the Alabama Department of Public Health will be instrumental in establishing this crucial metric.
Beyond the raw numbers, the geographical distribution of physicians within Danville is equally important. Are the existing primary care providers concentrated in one area, or are they spread throughout the community, offering greater convenience to residents? Access to care is significantly impacted by proximity. Residents in more remote areas of Danville might face greater challenges in reaching a primary care physician, potentially leading to delayed care and poorer health outcomes. Understanding the physical location of each practice and the demographics of the surrounding areas is vital to a complete assessment.
Identifying standout practices within Danville requires a deeper dive. This involves evaluating factors such as patient reviews, accreditation status, and the range of services offered. Practices with consistently positive patient feedback, as evidenced by online reviews and patient testimonials, are likely providing a high level of care. Accreditation by reputable organizations, such as the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) or the Joint Commission, often indicates a commitment to quality and safety standards. Furthermore, practices that offer a comprehensive range of services, including preventive care, chronic disease management, and specialized services like women’s health or geriatric care, are better equipped to meet the diverse healthcare needs of the community.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in modern healthcare. The ability to access care remotely, through video consultations or online portals, can significantly improve access, especially for residents in rural areas like Danville. Assessing the extent to which primary care practices in the area have embraced telemedicine is crucial. Do they offer virtual appointments? Do they utilize electronic health records to facilitate communication and information sharing? Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their operations are likely to be more accessible and responsive to patient needs. The availability of reliable internet access within the community is also a key consideration, as it directly impacts the feasibility of telemedicine.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. The availability of mental health services within Danville, including psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors, needs careful examination. Are there local providers offering these services? Are these providers accepting new patients? Are there any partnerships between primary care practices and mental health providers, facilitating integrated care? The presence of support groups, community mental health centers, and other resources can also significantly impact the mental well-being of residents. Assessing the accessibility and affordability of mental health services is crucial, as untreated mental health issues can negatively impact physical health and overall quality of life.
The overall health score for Danville will be influenced by several factors. A high physician-to-patient ratio, a geographically dispersed network of providers, positive patient reviews, robust telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources will all contribute to a higher score. Conversely, a low physician-to-patient ratio, limited geographical access, negative patient feedback, a lack of telemedicine adoption, and scarce mental health resources will negatively impact the score.
Data collection and analysis will be crucial to the assessment. Gathering information from various sources, including public health agencies, healthcare providers, and patient feedback platforms, will be essential. The data must be analyzed objectively, considering both quantitative and qualitative factors. The final overall health score should reflect a balanced assessment of the healthcare landscape in Danville, providing a valuable snapshot of the community's health status.
The assessment will also consider the demographic characteristics of Danville. The age distribution of the population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the socioeconomic factors that may impact health outcomes should be factored into the analysis. Understanding the specific needs of the community is essential for developing a comprehensive and accurate overall health score.
The process of compiling this information can be complex, requiring extensive research and analysis. The final score will be a reflection of the current healthcare environment in Danville, Alabama. The evaluation will also provide insights into areas where improvements can be made. It will highlight strengths and weaknesses in the healthcare system.
The creation of this health score is an ongoing process. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies and treatment options emerging regularly. Regular updates and reassessments are necessary to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the overall health score. This continuous evaluation ensures that the score remains a valuable tool for understanding and improving the health of the Danville community.
To visualize the healthcare landscape in Danville, and to gain a deeper understanding of physician locations, demographics, and service availability, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the healthcare environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like