The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 35621, Eva, Alabama is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 85.20 percent of the residents in 35621 has some form of health insurance. 24.25 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35621 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 874 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35621. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 280 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 539 health care providers accessible to residents in 35621, Eva, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35621, Eva, Alabama
Overall Health Score | 15 |
---|---|
People Score | 35 |
Provider Score | 24 |
Hospital Score | 29 |
Travel Score | 46 |
35621 | Eva | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 269.44 | 36,309.69 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 913.35 | 123,981.26 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 2,785.71 | 372,464.29 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Eva, Alabama (ZIP Code 35621)
Evaluating the overall health landscape of Eva, Alabama, specifically focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians within the 35621 ZIP code, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and examine the presence of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide an ‘Overall Health Score’ assessment, offering insights into the accessibility and quality of healthcare for the residents of Eva.
The foundation of a healthy community rests on the availability of primary care physicians. Analyzing physician-to-patient ratios is crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Data from sources like the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and state medical boards can provide this critical information. It is important to note that these ratios can fluctuate.
Within the 35621 ZIP code, it is necessary to identify the specific practices providing primary care services. This involves researching the names, locations, and specialties of the physicians practicing in the area. Are these practices part of larger healthcare systems, or are they independent? The organizational structure can influence resource allocation and the range of services offered. Publicly available information, such as practice websites and online directories, can be used to compile a comprehensive list.
Once the practices are identified, a deeper dive into their offerings is required. Are they accepting new patients? What are their hours of operation? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments? These practical considerations significantly impact access to care. Furthermore, understanding the types of insurance accepted is vital, as this directly affects the affordability of care for residents.
Identifying standout practices involves assessing various factors. Reputation is key. Online reviews from patients, while often subjective, provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction, communication, and the overall patient experience. Accreditation by organizations like the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) or the Joint Commission can also indicate a commitment to quality and safety. The presence of specialized services, such as chronic disease management programs or on-site laboratory testing, can further distinguish a practice.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Eva. Telemedicine can improve access to care by reducing the need for in-person visits, especially for follow-up appointments or consultations. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services within the practices in 35621 is crucial. This includes determining whether practices offer virtual appointments, remote patient monitoring, and the use of telehealth platforms. The ease of use and technological infrastructure of these platforms also need to be considered.
Mental health resources are a critical component of overall health. The analysis must investigate the availability of mental health services within the 35621 ZIP code or in close proximity. This includes identifying psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed professional counselors, and social workers. Are these providers accepting new patients? Do they accept insurance? The presence of support groups, mental health clinics, and crisis intervention services should also be considered.
The accessibility of mental health services can be further enhanced through integration with primary care practices. Co-locating mental health providers within primary care settings can improve coordination of care and reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment. Assessing the level of integration between primary care and mental health services is an important aspect of the overall health assessment.
Based on the above factors, an ‘Overall Health Score’ can be determined. This score would reflect the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality and accessibility of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The score would likely be presented on a scale, perhaps from 1 to 10, with 10 representing the highest level of healthcare quality and accessibility.
The score would be accompanied by a narrative summarizing the key findings. This narrative would highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in Eva. It would identify areas where improvements are needed, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, or enhancing the availability of mental health resources.
It is also important to consider the demographics of the community. The age distribution, socioeconomic status, and prevalence of chronic diseases can all impact healthcare needs. This information should be factored into the analysis to provide a more nuanced understanding of the health landscape.
The analysis should also consider any unique challenges faced by the community. Rural areas often face barriers to healthcare access, such as transportation limitations and a shortage of healthcare professionals. These challenges should be acknowledged and addressed in the assessment.
Finally, the ‘Overall Health Score’ should be a dynamic measure. Healthcare is constantly evolving, and the score should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This requires ongoing monitoring and data collection. The analysis should also be transparent, clearly outlining the data sources and methodology used.
For a detailed visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Eva, including the location of practices, the distribution of healthcare providers, and the availability of resources, consider using the powerful mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide an interactive and informative way to explore the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare situation in the 35621 ZIP code.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like