The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 35633, Florence, Alabama is 57 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.35 percent of the residents in 35633 has some form of health insurance. 36.69 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35633 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,715 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35633. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,181 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,957 health care providers accessible to residents in 35633, Florence, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35633, Florence, Alabama
Overall Health Score | 29 |
---|---|
People Score | 34 |
Provider Score | 57 |
Hospital Score | 8 |
Travel Score | 62 |
35633 | Florence | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 229.30 | 1,424.34 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 1,102.99 | 7,304.60 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 1,112.17 | 7,023.82 | 0.00 |
**Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 35633 & Primary Care Availability in Florence, Alabama**
Evaluating the overall health landscape within ZIP code 35633 and the broader context of primary care availability in Florence, Alabama, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into key indicators, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. A comprehensive understanding of these factors allows for a more informed assessment of the health and well-being of the community.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. It provides a snapshot of the accessibility of healthcare services. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests better access. Data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the Alabama Department of Public Health will be critical in establishing this ratio for 35633. Florence, being a regional hub, may influence this ratio positively or negatively. Proximity to larger medical centers could draw physicians away from smaller communities, creating a potential disparity in access. Conversely, the presence of teaching hospitals or residency programs could bolster the physician supply.
Standout medical practices contribute significantly to the quality of care. Identifying these practices involves assessing their reputation, patient reviews, and the range of services offered. Practices that emphasize preventative care, chronic disease management, and patient-centered approaches are often highly regarded. The presence of board-certified physicians, specialized clinics, and affiliations with larger healthcare systems are also indicators of quality. Furthermore, the integration of technology, such as electronic health records and patient portals, enhances efficiency and communication.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. It expands access to care, particularly for patients who face geographic or mobility challenges. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves examining the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring services, and online patient portals. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to innovation and patient convenience. Analyzing the types of telemedicine services offered (e.g., primary care, specialist consultations, mental health) provides a more nuanced understanding of its impact.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. Evaluating the availability of mental health services requires examining the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counseling centers. Access to these resources can be assessed by examining the number of mental health professionals per capita, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the acceptance of insurance. Furthermore, the integration of mental health services into primary care settings is a positive indicator, promoting a more holistic approach to patient care.
Florence, as a regional center, may have a more robust mental health infrastructure than the immediate 35633 area. However, the availability of transportation and the cost of care can still create barriers to access. Examining community partnerships, such as collaborations between healthcare providers and schools or social service agencies, can highlight efforts to improve mental health access.
Data collection is crucial for a complete analysis. This involves compiling information from various sources, including the U.S. Census Bureau, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, state and local health departments, and healthcare provider directories. Patient reviews and online ratings platforms also provide valuable insights. Analyzing this data requires careful consideration of potential biases and limitations. For example, online reviews may not be representative of the entire patient population.
The economic and social factors that influence health must also be considered. Socioeconomic status, education levels, and access to healthy food options all affect health outcomes. Identifying these factors helps to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the health landscape. Communities with higher rates of poverty or limited access to resources may face greater health challenges.
The overall health score is a composite measure. It considers all the aforementioned factors. A high score indicates a healthy community with good access to care, quality providers, and robust mental health resources. Conversely, a low score suggests potential challenges in accessing healthcare and the need for improvements. The final score would be a qualitative assessment informed by the quantitative data.
The analysis will also examine the specific challenges and opportunities within 35633. This includes identifying any disparities in access to care based on race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. It will also highlight any successful initiatives or programs that are improving health outcomes. Understanding these local nuances is essential for developing targeted interventions and improving community health.
The overall health score is not static. It is a snapshot in time. Healthcare landscapes evolve. Regular monitoring and evaluation are essential to track progress and identify areas for improvement. This ongoing assessment allows for adjustments to healthcare strategies and ensures that the community's health needs are met.
Finally, the analysis will provide recommendations for improving healthcare access and quality in 35633 and Florence. This includes suggestions for increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, and improving access to mental health resources. It may also include recommendations for community partnerships and public health initiatives. These recommendations are designed to be actionable and contribute to a healthier community.
If you want a comprehensive visual representation of the healthcare landscape in 35633 and Florence, Alabama, including physician locations, practice specializations, and demographic data, then consider using CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like