Overall Health Score

35649, Mooresville, Alabama Overall Health Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 35649, Mooresville, Alabama

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 35649, Mooresville, Alabama is 70 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 35649 has some form of health insurance. 43.37 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.88 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35649 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 12 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35649. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 21 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,175 health care providers accessible to residents in 35649, Mooresville, Alabama.

Health Scores in 35649, Mooresville, Alabama

Overall Health Score 95
People Score 100
Provider Score 70
Hospital Score 57
Travel Score 53

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

35649 Mooresville Alabama
Providers per 10,000 residents 210,361.45 1,120,361.45 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 1,930,000.00 10,277,777.78 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 821,428.57 4,321,904.76 0.00

Provider Score Review of 35649, Mooresville, Alabama

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 35649 & Primary Care Availability in Mooresville

Mooresville, Alabama, nestled within ZIP Code 35649, presents a unique microcosm for evaluating healthcare access and quality. An "Overall Health Score" analysis requires a multifaceted approach, considering physician availability, the infrastructure supporting patient care, and the integration of modern healthcare solutions. While a definitive numerical score would necessitate access to proprietary datasets, this analysis provides a comprehensive qualitative assessment, highlighting key strengths and weaknesses within the local healthcare landscape.

One of the primary indicators of health access is the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric reveals the potential strain on existing medical resources. In Mooresville, and indeed across much of rural Alabama, this ratio is likely a point of concern. The national average physician-to-population ratio is generally higher than what is observed in rural areas. This disparity can translate into longer wait times for appointments, increased pressure on existing providers, and potentially, reduced access to specialized care. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is particularly critical. They serve as the gateway to the healthcare system, providing preventative care, managing chronic conditions, and coordinating referrals to specialists. A shortage of PCPs can exacerbate existing health disparities and negatively impact overall community health.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within ZIP Code 35649 requires examining factors such as patient satisfaction, the adoption of evidence-based practices, and the range of services offered. Assessing patient reviews, available online or through local community surveys, can provide valuable insights into patient experiences. Practices demonstrating a commitment to preventative care, chronic disease management, and patient education are generally considered high-quality. The presence of on-site diagnostic services, such as X-ray or lab testing, can also improve patient convenience and facilitate timely diagnoses. Furthermore, practices that are actively involved in community outreach and health education initiatives often demonstrate a deeper commitment to the well-being of their patients.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor influencing the overall health score. Telemedicine offers a powerful tool for bridging geographical barriers and expanding access to care, especially in rural communities. The ability to consult with a physician remotely, receive prescriptions electronically, and monitor chronic conditions through remote devices can significantly improve patient outcomes. The level of telemedicine integration within practices in 35649 is a key indicator of their forward-thinking approach and commitment to patient convenience. Practices that offer telehealth options, particularly for routine follow-up appointments and consultations, are likely to score higher in terms of accessibility and patient-centered care.

Mental health resources are often under-resourced, particularly in rural areas. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is a crucial component of a comprehensive healthcare system. The ability to access mental health services locally, without the need for extensive travel, is essential for addressing mental health concerns effectively. The presence of community mental health centers, partnerships with local schools, and the integration of mental health services within primary care practices are all positive indicators. Moreover, the availability of support groups and educational resources related to mental health can further enhance community well-being. The analysis must consider the availability of these resources and the ease with which residents can access them.

Furthermore, the integration of technology beyond telemedicine is essential. Electronic health records (EHRs) are now standard. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively can improve care coordination, reduce medical errors, and enhance communication between providers. The ability to share patient information securely and efficiently is critical for providing seamless and integrated care. Practices that have invested in robust EHR systems and patient portals are generally better positioned to provide high-quality care. The level of technological sophistication within a practice can also reflect its commitment to innovation and efficiency.

Another element to consider is the presence of specialized care. While primary care is foundational, the availability of specialists is essential for addressing complex medical needs. The proximity to specialists, such as cardiologists, neurologists, and oncologists, can significantly impact patient outcomes. The need for patients to travel long distances for specialized care can create significant logistical and financial burdens. The analysis should consider the proximity to specialty care centers and the availability of transportation options for patients.

The healthcare landscape is dynamic. The overall health score must also consider the impact of external factors, such as local economic conditions and social determinants of health. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food, and inadequate housing can all negatively impact health outcomes. Understanding the social and economic context of the community is essential for a comprehensive assessment of healthcare access and quality. The analysis should consider the availability of social services and support programs that can address these factors.

Finally, the analysis should consider the presence of community health initiatives. Local hospitals, clinics, and public health agencies often play a critical role in promoting health and well-being. The presence of programs such as free health screenings, health education campaigns, and community outreach initiatives can significantly improve the health of the population. The analysis should assess the extent to which these initiatives are available and accessible to the residents of Mooresville.

In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for doctors in ZIP Code 35649 and primary care availability in Mooresville requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, technological integration, access to specialized care, socioeconomic factors, and community health initiatives. While specific data is required for a definitive numerical score, a thorough qualitative analysis reveals the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. This information is essential for identifying areas for improvement and developing strategies to enhance the health and well-being of the Mooresville community.

To visualize the healthcare landscape and gain a deeper understanding of the spatial distribution of resources and access points, consider exploring the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome maps. They provide a powerful tool for analyzing healthcare data and identifying areas of need within your community.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 35649, Mooresville, Alabama

You may also like

35615, Belle Mina, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 2.21 Miles

Total Population:

35671, Tanner, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 5.54 Miles

Total Population:

35601, Decatur, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 6.52 Miles

Total Population:

35603, Decatur, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 7.93 Miles

Total Population:

35613, Athens, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 11.43 Miles

Total Population:

35640, Hartselle, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 12.67 Miles

Total Population:

35611, Athens, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 13.45 Miles

Total Population:

35670, Somerville, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 13.46 Miles

Total Population:

35673, Trinity, Alabama
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 35649: 14.10 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 35649, Mooresville, Alabama