The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 36454, Lenox, Alabama is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 36454 has some form of health insurance. 13.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.96 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36454 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36454. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 307 health care providers accessible to residents in 36454, Lenox, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36454, Lenox, Alabama
Overall Health Score | 58 |
---|---|
People Score | 100 |
Provider Score | 24 |
Hospital Score | 48 |
Travel Score | 31 |
36454 | Lenox | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 55,652.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 420,000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 36454 & Primary Care Availability in Lenox
This analysis provides an 'Overall Health Score' assessment, evaluating the availability and quality of healthcare resources in two distinct areas: the doctors practicing within ZIP code 36454 (likely a rural area) and the primary care availability within Lenox (assumed to be a more urban setting). We will examine various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This will provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in each location.
**ZIP Code 36454: A Rural Healthcare Landscape**
Assessing healthcare in ZIP code 36454 requires acknowledging the inherent challenges of rural healthcare delivery. A primary concern is the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric reflects the number of physicians available to serve the population. In rural areas, this ratio is often significantly lower than in urban centers. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances to access care, and a potential strain on existing healthcare providers. The exact physician-to-patient ratio for 36454 would require specific data from the area, but a low ratio would negatively impact the overall health score.
The presence of standout practices is another critical factor. These practices might be distinguished by their specialized services, patient satisfaction scores, or innovative approaches to care. Identifying any such practices within 36454 would be essential. Do they offer a wide range of services? Do they utilize electronic health records effectively? Are they actively involved in community outreach programs? The absence of standout practices, or a limited number of them, would negatively impact the overall score.
Telemedicine adoption is particularly crucial in rural areas like 36454. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access specialists and primary care physicians remotely. Examining the extent of telemedicine adoption among the physicians in this ZIP code is vital. Do they offer virtual consultations? Do they utilize remote patient monitoring? The lack of telemedicine adoption would be a significant drawback, especially for patients with limited mobility or transportation options.
Mental health resources are often scarce in rural areas. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is critical. Do the existing practices offer mental health services? Are there partnerships with mental health organizations? The absence of readily accessible mental health resources would significantly detract from the overall health score, as mental health is an integral component of overall well-being.
**Primary Care Availability in Lenox: An Urban Perspective**
Lenox, assumed to be a more urban area, likely presents a different healthcare landscape. While physician-to-patient ratios might be more favorable than in 36454, it is still important to evaluate the availability of primary care physicians. Are there enough primary care providers to meet the needs of the population? Are there any shortages or areas where access to care is limited? A lower physician-to-patient ratio would negatively impact the overall health score.
The presence of standout practices in Lenox could be evaluated based on their patient satisfaction scores, their utilization of advanced technologies, and their commitment to preventative care. Are these practices adopting the latest advancements in medical technology? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments to improve access? The presence of high-quality primary care practices would positively impact the overall health score.
Telemedicine adoption is also relevant in Lenox, although perhaps less critical than in a rural setting. However, telemedicine can still improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those seeking convenient follow-up appointments. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care physicians in Lenox is important.
Mental health resources are often more readily available in urban areas compared to rural areas. Evaluating the availability of mental health professionals and services in Lenox is still crucial. Are there partnerships between primary care practices and mental health providers? Is there access to a range of mental health services, including therapy, counseling, and psychiatric care? The availability of comprehensive mental health resources would positively impact the overall health score.
**Comparative Analysis and Overall Score Considerations**
Comparing the healthcare landscapes of 36454 and Lenox reveals significant differences. 36454 likely faces challenges related to rural healthcare, including lower physician-to-patient ratios, limited access to specialists, and potential difficulties in accessing mental health resources. Lenox, on the other hand, may have a more favorable healthcare environment, with potentially higher physician-to-patient ratios and greater access to a wider range of services.
The overall health score for each location would be influenced by the factors discussed above. For 36454, the score would likely be lower due to the challenges inherent in rural healthcare. Lenox would likely receive a higher score, reflecting the potentially greater availability of resources. However, the specific scores would depend on the detailed data available for each location.
**Conclusion**
Assessing the healthcare landscape requires a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence access to care, quality of care, and overall health outcomes. This analysis highlights the importance of considering physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources when evaluating the overall health score of a location.
For a more detailed, data-driven visualization of these healthcare landscapes, including maps highlighting physician locations, service availability, and demographic data, we encourage you to explore the capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a valuable visual representation of the healthcare resources available in these areas, allowing for a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing healthcare providers and patients alike.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like