The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 36549, Lillian, Alabama is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 81.07 percent of the residents in 36549 has some form of health insurance. 55.20 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36549 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 874 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36549. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,196 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,655 health care providers accessible to residents in 36549, Lillian, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36549, Lillian, Alabama
Overall Health Score | 49 |
---|---|
People Score | 63 |
Provider Score | 36 |
Hospital Score | 59 |
Travel Score | 33 |
36549 | Lillian | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 458.41 | 6,690.40 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 3,246.59 | 47,571.25 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 1,183.97 | 17,244.99 | 0.00 |
The evaluation of overall health within a specific geographic area, like Lillian, Alabama (ZIP Code 36549), demands a multifaceted approach. It necessitates a granular understanding of the healthcare landscape, encompassing physician availability, the presence of specialized services, and the adoption of modern technologies. This analysis aims to provide an "Overall Health Score" assessment for this region, considering key factors that influence community well-being.
A crucial element in assessing health access is the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric quantifies the number of physicians available to serve a given population. A low ratio suggests potential difficulties in securing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment. Conversely, a high ratio indicates greater accessibility to medical care. For Lillian, specifically, data on the physician-to-patient ratio must be gathered from credible sources, such as the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services or state medical boards. Publicly available data may be limited to county-level statistics, requiring careful interpretation and potentially, estimations for the Lillian area. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is particularly vital. PCPs act as the initial point of contact for medical concerns, providing preventative care and coordinating specialist referrals.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care offered by existing practices is paramount. Identifying "standout practices" requires an evaluation of several criteria. Patient reviews, available through platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals, provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction. Accreditation by organizations such as the Joint Commission or the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) indicates a commitment to quality standards. Examining the range of services offered, including preventative screenings, chronic disease management, and specialist referrals, also provides a more comprehensive picture. The presence of after-hours care, walk-in clinics, and extended operating hours contributes to accessibility. Furthermore, evaluating the practice's integration with electronic health records (EHRs) and its ability to facilitate communication with patients enhances the overall care experience.
The adoption of telemedicine has dramatically reshaped healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine, encompassing virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for individuals with mobility limitations or those residing in underserved areas. Assessing telemedicine adoption in Lillian involves identifying practices that offer virtual appointments, the types of services offered via telemedicine (e.g., primary care, mental health counseling), and the technology platforms utilized. The availability of reliable internet access within the community is also a critical factor, as it directly impacts the feasibility of telemedicine.
Mental health resources represent a critical component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, is essential for addressing mental health concerns. The presence of mental health clinics, counseling services, and support groups within the community contributes to a robust mental health infrastructure. Evaluating the accessibility of these resources involves assessing appointment wait times, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the availability of services tailored to specific populations (e.g., children, veterans). Integration of mental health services within primary care practices can also improve access and coordination of care.
To formulate an "Overall Health Score" for Lillian, these factors must be weighted and combined. The physician-to-patient ratio provides a foundational metric, reflecting the general availability of medical professionals. The quality of care offered by standout practices contributes significantly to the score, reflecting the standard of care available. The degree of telemedicine adoption enhances accessibility, particularly for those with limited mobility or transportation options. The presence and accessibility of mental health resources are crucial for overall well-being. Each factor should be assigned a weight based on its relative importance, and a scoring system should be established to evaluate each criterion. The final score would reflect the overall health of the community.
For example, a high physician-to-patient ratio, combined with a high concentration of quality practices and robust telemedicine adoption, would contribute to a higher overall score. Conversely, a low physician-to-patient ratio, coupled with limited access to mental health services and low telemedicine adoption, would result in a lower score. The specific data points for Lillian, Alabama, would need to be gathered from various sources, including local healthcare providers, government agencies, and online healthcare directories. This data would then be analyzed and synthesized to generate the "Overall Health Score."
A comprehensive analysis also requires a consideration of demographic factors. The age distribution of the population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the socioeconomic status of the community can all influence health outcomes. Adjusting the "Overall Health Score" to account for these factors provides a more nuanced and accurate assessment of the community's health.
The final "Overall Health Score" should be presented with clear explanations of the methodology used, the data sources consulted, and the limitations of the analysis. It should provide a clear picture of the healthcare landscape in Lillian, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. This information can be used by healthcare providers, community leaders, and residents to make informed decisions about healthcare access and resource allocation.
For a more detailed, visually driven analysis, exploring the healthcare landscape in Lillian and surrounding areas, consider leveraging the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visually represent the data discussed in this analysis, including physician locations, practice quality ratings, and telemedicine availability. This visual representation allows for a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and helps to identify areas of need.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like