36744, Greensboro, Alabama Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 36744, Greensboro, Alabama is 4 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.45 percent of the residents in 36744 has some form of health insurance. 53.14 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.10 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36744 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,345 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36744. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,157 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 247 health care providers accessible to residents in 36744, Greensboro, Alabama.

**Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 36744 & Primary Care Availability in Greensboro**

This analysis assesses the overall health landscape within ZIP code 36744 (covering parts of Wilcox County, Alabama) and the primary care environment in Greensboro, North Carolina. We will evaluate factors impacting access to care, quality of services, and the integration of modern healthcare practices. This evaluation aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses within these distinct geographical areas.

**ZIP Code 36744: A Rural Healthcare Perspective**

The healthcare challenges in 36744 are typical of rural communities. A key concern is physician-to-patient ratio. Data suggests a potential scarcity of primary care physicians compared to the population. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances for residents seeking care, and potentially reduced access to preventative services. The specifics of the physician-to-patient ratio require local data analysis, but the likelihood of a less favorable ratio is high.

Standout practices in this area are difficult to identify without detailed local information. The presence of a hospital or clinic is crucial. These facilities often serve as the primary point of access for healthcare services. The availability of specialty care is likely limited, forcing residents to travel to larger cities for specialized treatments.

Telemedicine adoption in 36744 may be a crucial factor in bridging healthcare gaps. Telemedicine can offer remote consultations, medication management, and chronic disease monitoring. However, the success of telemedicine hinges on reliable internet access, which can be a challenge in rural areas. The availability of telehealth services is a critical indicator of the community’s ability to adapt to modern healthcare solutions.

Mental health resources in 36744 are another area of concern. Rural communities often face shortages of mental health professionals. This can lead to delayed diagnoses, limited access to therapy, and a higher prevalence of untreated mental health conditions. The integration of mental health services into primary care settings, if present, can improve access.

**Primary Care Availability in Greensboro, North Carolina: A City-Based Assessment**

Greensboro, being a city, presents a different healthcare landscape. The physician-to-patient ratio is likely more favorable than in rural areas. However, even in urban settings, disparities in access to care can exist. The concentration of physicians in certain areas, insurance acceptance, and socioeconomic factors can all influence access.

Standout practices in Greensboro might be identified by their patient satisfaction scores, their integration of technology, and their commitment to preventative care. These practices might offer extended hours, online appointment scheduling, and a focus on patient education. The presence of a large hospital system or a network of affiliated clinics can also contribute to the overall quality of care.

Telemedicine adoption in Greensboro is likely more widespread than in 36744. Many practices may offer virtual consultations, allowing patients to connect with their physicians remotely. This can improve convenience and reduce the need for in-person visits, especially for follow-up appointments or minor health concerns.

Mental health resources in Greensboro may be more abundant than in rural areas. The city likely has a greater number of psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists. The availability of mental health clinics, counseling centers, and support groups can enhance access to care. Integration of mental health services into primary care practices is also a positive indicator.

**Comparative Analysis and Key Considerations**

Comparing the two areas reveals significant differences. 36744 faces challenges related to physician shortages, limited access to specialty care, and potential barriers to telemedicine adoption. Greensboro, with its urban setting, likely has a more favorable healthcare environment. However, even in Greensboro, disparities in access to care may exist.

Several factors warrant further consideration. The role of community health centers in both areas is significant. These centers often provide affordable healthcare services to underserved populations. The presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) can improve access to care.

The impact of insurance coverage on healthcare access is another crucial factor. The percentage of uninsured residents in each area can influence the demand for care and the ability of individuals to afford healthcare services. The acceptance of various insurance plans by healthcare providers is also a key consideration.

The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is essential for improving the efficiency and quality of care. EHRs allow physicians to access patient information quickly, coordinate care effectively, and track patient outcomes. The level of EHR adoption can influence the overall quality of care.

The role of public health initiatives in promoting health and wellness is also important. Public health programs can address health disparities, promote preventative care, and educate the public about healthy lifestyles. The presence of these programs can improve the overall health of the community.

**Conclusion**

The healthcare landscape in 36744 and Greensboro presents distinct challenges and opportunities. 36744 requires strategies to address physician shortages and improve access to care. Greensboro needs to ensure equitable access to care and continue to integrate modern healthcare practices.

To visualize and analyze these healthcare landscapes further, including physician locations, population demographics, and access to care metrics, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the healthcare environment, enabling a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities in each area.