The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 36804, Opelika, Alabama is 26 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.28 percent of the residents in 36804 has some form of health insurance. 38.42 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.32 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36804 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,709 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36804. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,452 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,900 health care providers accessible to residents in 36804, Opelika, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36804, Opelika, Alabama
| Overall Health Score | 11 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 22 |
| Provider Score | 26 |
| Hospital Score | 26 |
| Travel Score | 50 |
| 36804 | Opelika | Alabama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 252.76 | 2,264.83 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 1,121.43 | 10,427.69 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 1,929.04 | 13,561.82 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Opelika, Alabama (ZIP Code 36804)
Opelika, Alabama, nestled within the heart of Lee County, presents a multifaceted picture when examining the overall health landscape. This analysis focuses on the availability and quality of primary care physicians within the 36804 ZIP code, aiming to provide an 'Overall Health Score' assessment. This score considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental indicator of accessibility. A higher ratio, meaning fewer patients per physician, generally suggests better access to care. Data from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards are crucial in determining this ratio. Opelika, like many areas, may face challenges in this regard. The specific ratio fluctuates and requires regular updates. A low ratio could point to potential bottlenecks, longer wait times for appointments, and potentially overburdened physicians. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests a more readily available primary care network.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care provided is paramount. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several elements. Patient reviews, available through platforms like Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google Reviews, offer valuable insights into patient experiences. These reviews often highlight aspects such as physician communication, wait times, and overall satisfaction. Accreditation by organizations like the Joint Commission or the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) also indicates a commitment to quality and safety standards. Furthermore, the presence of board-certified physicians within a practice often signifies a higher level of expertise.
The adoption of telemedicine has dramatically reshaped healthcare delivery, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine offers several advantages, including increased accessibility for patients in rural areas, convenience, and reduced exposure to infectious diseases. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within Opelika's primary care practices is vital. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and the use of patient portals for communication and appointment scheduling. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a forward-thinking approach to patient care.
Mental health resources represent a critical component of overall well-being. The availability of mental health services within the primary care setting is a significant factor. Ideally, primary care physicians should be able to screen patients for mental health conditions and provide initial treatment or referrals to specialists. Assessing the presence of on-site therapists or partnerships with mental health providers is essential. The availability of community mental health centers, support groups, and crisis intervention services also contributes to a comprehensive mental health ecosystem.
The overall health score for Opelika (36804) is a composite measure. It combines the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by standout practices, the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. Each factor is weighted based on its relative importance in contributing to overall health outcomes. The score is not a static number; it is a dynamic measure that changes over time. Regular monitoring and updates are necessary to reflect the evolving healthcare landscape.
Analyzing specific practices within the 36804 ZIP code requires a granular approach. Identifying practices with consistently positive patient reviews, a high percentage of board-certified physicians, and a strong commitment to telemedicine is crucial. Assessing the availability of mental health services within these practices is equally important. This detailed analysis provides a more nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care network in Opelika.
The challenges facing Opelika's healthcare system may include workforce shortages, particularly in primary care and mental health, and disparities in access to care based on socioeconomic factors. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach, including efforts to attract and retain healthcare professionals, expand access to affordable healthcare services, and promote health equity.
The future of healthcare in Opelika depends on continuous improvement. This includes ongoing monitoring of key health indicators, the adoption of innovative technologies, and a commitment to providing high-quality, patient-centered care. The 'Overall Health Score' serves as a valuable tool for tracking progress and identifying areas for improvement.
The data used to calculate the 'Overall Health Score' needs to be regularly updated. This includes physician data, patient reviews, telemedicine adoption rates, and mental health resource availability. The score is only as accurate as the data it is based on.
Understanding the healthcare landscape in Opelika is crucial for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers. The 'Overall Health Score' provides a valuable framework for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care network and identifying areas for improvement. This analysis provides a snapshot of the current situation, highlighting key factors that influence overall health outcomes.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like