The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 06234, Brooklyn, Connecticut is 50 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.89 percent of the residents in 06234 has some form of health insurance. 33.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.16 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06234 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,964 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06234. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,398 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 448 health care providers accessible to residents in 06234, Brooklyn, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06234, Brooklyn, Connecticut
Overall Health Score | 39 |
---|---|
People Score | 41 |
Provider Score | 50 |
Hospital Score | 46 |
Travel Score | 40 |
06234 | Brooklyn | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 497.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 2,182.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 2,783.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 06234 & Primary Care Availability in Brooklyn**
This analysis provides an overall health score assessment, comparing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 06234 (a rural area) and the borough of Brooklyn (a densely populated urban environment). The evaluation considers factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to paint a clear picture of healthcare access and quality in these distinct geographic areas.
**ZIP Code 06234: A Rural Perspective**
ZIP code 06234, likely representing a rural community, often faces unique healthcare challenges. One of the most critical factors is the physician-to-patient ratio. Rural areas frequently experience a shortage of primary care physicians and specialists. This scarcity can lead to longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances for medical care, and a potential for delayed diagnoses and treatment. The overall health score for 06234 will likely be negatively impacted by this limited access.
Standout practices, if present, would be crucial in mitigating these challenges. The presence of a well-equipped and staffed primary care clinic, or a small group of dedicated physicians, could significantly improve the health outcomes for the community. The quality of care provided by these practices, including their ability to manage chronic conditions and provide preventative care, would be a significant determinant of the overall score.
Telemedicine adoption is especially important in rural settings. The ability to access virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online health education can help bridge the geographical gap and improve healthcare access. The availability of reliable internet access and the willingness of local physicians to embrace telemedicine technologies would be key factors in determining the score.
Mental health resources are often lacking in rural areas. The overall health score would be negatively affected if there is a shortage of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists. The presence of community mental health centers, school-based mental health programs, or partnerships with regional mental health providers would be crucial for improving the score.
**Brooklyn: An Urban Landscape**
Brooklyn, a major urban center, presents a different set of healthcare challenges and opportunities. While it generally has a higher physician-to-patient ratio than rural areas, disparities in access can still exist. Certain neighborhoods may experience physician shortages or a lack of specialists, particularly in underserved communities. The overall health score would be influenced by the equitable distribution of healthcare resources across the borough.
Standout practices in Brooklyn might include large hospital systems, community health centers, and specialized clinics. The quality of care provided by these practices, their patient satisfaction ratings, and their commitment to addressing health disparities would all contribute to the overall score. The presence of innovative programs, such as integrated care models or patient-centered medical homes, could positively impact the score.
Telemedicine adoption is growing rapidly in urban areas. The ability to access virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online health education can improve healthcare access and convenience. The availability of telehealth services from local hospitals, clinics, and private practices would be a positive factor in the overall score.
Mental health resources are crucial in a diverse and densely populated urban environment. The overall health score would be influenced by the availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists. The presence of community mental health centers, mental health clinics, and partnerships with local hospitals and social service agencies would be crucial for improving the score. The availability of culturally competent mental health services, tailored to the needs of diverse populations, would also be a positive factor.
**Comparative Analysis and Overall Score**
Comparing the two areas, Brooklyn likely has a higher overall health score due to its greater access to healthcare resources. However, disparities in access and quality of care within Brooklyn could lead to lower scores in specific neighborhoods. ZIP code 06234, facing the challenges of rural healthcare, will likely have a lower overall score, but the presence of dedicated healthcare providers and the adoption of telemedicine could significantly improve the score.
The overall health score for each area should be viewed as a dynamic measure. It is subject to change based on factors such as population growth, changes in healthcare policies, and the adoption of new technologies. Regular assessments are needed to monitor the healthcare landscape and identify areas for improvement.
The final scores would be determined by a weighted average of the factors discussed, with physician-to-patient ratios, access to care, and the quality of mental health resources carrying the most weight. The scores would be expressed on a scale, perhaps from 1 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible health outcomes.
**Conclusion**
Understanding the healthcare landscape in specific geographic areas is crucial for improving public health. This analysis provides a framework for evaluating the overall health score in ZIP code 06234 and Brooklyn. The availability of physicians, the adoption of telemedicine, and the presence of mental health resources are all key factors in determining the health outcomes of these communities.
To further explore the healthcare landscape in these areas, and to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider using **CartoChrome maps**. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize physician density, access to care, and other relevant data points, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like