The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 06243, East Killingly, Connecticut is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 06243 has some form of health insurance. 16.09 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06243 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 86 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06243. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 42 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 235 health care providers accessible to residents in 06243, East Killingly, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06243, East Killingly, Connecticut
Overall Health Score | 16 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 24 |
Hospital Score | 45 |
Travel Score | 67 |
06243 | East Killingly | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 4,827.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 14,651.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 28,571.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: East Killingly, CT (ZIP Code 06243)
Assessing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 06243, encompassing East Killingly, Connecticut, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis considers the availability of primary care physicians, the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of notable medical practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. Ultimately, we aim to provide an “Overall Health Score” that reflects the community's access to and quality of healthcare.
The foundation of any healthy community rests on the availability of primary care physicians. In East Killingly, the accessibility of these crucial gatekeepers of health is a key factor. We must evaluate the density of primary care providers within the ZIP code and the surrounding areas. This involves considering the number of practicing physicians, their specialties, and their willingness to accept new patients. Limited access to primary care can lead to delayed diagnoses, increased emergency room visits, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating a larger number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, a decline in the quality of care. Data from sources like the Connecticut Department of Public Health and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) are essential to determine the physician-to-patient ratio in East Killingly. This data, when compared to state and national averages, offers a valuable perspective on the community's access to care.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care provided by existing practices is equally important. Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code is crucial. This requires evaluating factors such as patient reviews, the range of services offered, and the practice's commitment to preventative care. Practices that have embraced innovative approaches, such as patient portals, electronic health records, and integrated care models, often demonstrate a higher level of patient satisfaction and improved health outcomes.
The adoption of telemedicine is another significant factor in the overall health score. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient education, has the potential to expand access to care, especially for individuals with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas. Evaluating the extent to which local practices have embraced telemedicine, and the types of services they offer virtually, provides insight into the community's ability to leverage technology to improve healthcare delivery.
Mental health resources are an integral component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, is a key indicator of community well-being. Assessing the number of mental health providers in East Killingly, along with their acceptance of insurance and their ability to provide timely access to care, is essential. Furthermore, the presence of community-based mental health programs, support groups, and crisis intervention services contributes significantly to the overall health score.
To calculate the “Overall Health Score,” we need to integrate these factors. We can assign weighted values to each category – primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The weights should reflect the relative importance of each factor in determining the overall health of the community. For example, primary care availability and physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption, recognizing their foundational role in healthcare access.
The analysis should also consider demographic factors, such as the age distribution of the population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and socioeconomic indicators. These factors can influence the demand for healthcare services and the specific needs of the community. A community with a higher proportion of elderly residents, for instance, may require more geriatric care and support services.
Gathering data from multiple sources is essential. This includes public health agencies, healthcare providers, insurance companies, and patient surveys. Analyzing this data requires both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative analysis involves calculating metrics such as physician-to-patient ratios and the number of mental health providers. Qualitative analysis involves reviewing patient reviews, assessing the quality of services offered, and evaluating the effectiveness of community-based programs.
The final “Overall Health Score” should be presented in a clear and concise manner. It could be a numerical score, a letter grade, or a combination of both. The score should be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the methodology used and the factors considered. It should also identify areas of strength and weakness in the community's healthcare system.
For example, a high score might indicate excellent primary care availability, a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, a strong presence of standout practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and robust mental health resources. Conversely, a low score might reflect limited access to primary care, a high physician-to-patient ratio, a lack of telemedicine options, and inadequate mental health services.
The analysis should also identify potential solutions to address any identified weaknesses. This could include recommendations for increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, improving access to mental health resources, and promoting community-based health initiatives.
In conclusion, evaluating the “Overall Health Score” for East Killingly, CT (ZIP code 06243) provides a valuable snapshot of the community's healthcare landscape. By considering factors such as primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of medical practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the community's strengths and weaknesses. This analysis can serve as a valuable tool for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members, helping them to make informed decisions and work towards improving the overall health and well-being of the residents of East Killingly.
Want to visualize this data and explore the health landscape of East Killingly and beyond? Explore the power of geospatial data analysis with CartoChrome maps. Gain deeper insights into healthcare access and resource distribution.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like