06336, Gilman, Connecticut Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 06336, Gilman, Connecticut is 58 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 06336 has some form of health insurance. 13.58 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 90.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06336 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 39 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06336. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,687 health care providers accessible to residents in 06336, Gilman, Connecticut.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 06336 & Primary Care Availability in Gilman

This analysis provides an overall health score assessment for medical resources within ZIP code 06336, focusing on primary care availability in the specific area of Gilman. The evaluation encompasses various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This comprehensive approach aims to offer a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape in this region.

The foundation of any health assessment lies in understanding the accessibility of primary care physicians. In Gilman, a critical element is the physician-to-patient ratio. Analyzing this ratio reveals the potential burden placed on existing medical professionals. A high ratio, indicating a large number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially impacting preventative care and timely treatment. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility, allowing for more personalized care and potentially improved health outcomes. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), is crucial for determining these ratios, and this data should be consulted to establish a baseline understanding of the current situation.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within 06336 is crucial. This involves assessing factors like patient satisfaction, the range of services offered, and the adoption of innovative healthcare practices. Practices that consistently receive positive patient reviews, demonstrate a commitment to preventative care, and integrate advanced technologies are likely to be considered high-performing. Investigating the accreditation status of local hospitals and clinics, such as those from the Joint Commission, can also provide valuable insights into the quality of care provided.

Telemedicine has emerged as a significant force in modern healthcare, especially in areas with potential access limitations. The adoption of telemedicine by practices within 06336 is a key indicator of healthcare accessibility. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with physicians remotely, receive prescriptions, and manage chronic conditions more efficiently. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are likely to offer greater convenience and flexibility for patients, particularly those with mobility issues or those residing in remote areas of Gilman. Examining the types of telemedicine services offered, such as video consultations, remote monitoring, and secure messaging, provides a comprehensive picture of the telemedicine landscape.

Mental health is an integral component of overall well-being, and the availability of mental health resources is a critical factor in assessing the health of a community. This analysis must investigate the presence of mental health providers, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors, within the 06336 area. The availability of mental health services can be assessed by evaluating the number of mental health professionals per capita, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services (e.g., insurance acceptance, appointment availability). The presence of crisis intervention services and support groups is also an important factor.

Furthermore, the integration of mental and physical healthcare services should be considered. Practices that offer integrated care, where mental health professionals collaborate with primary care physicians, can provide more comprehensive and coordinated care. This integration can lead to earlier detection of mental health issues and improved outcomes. The presence of specialized programs, such as those for substance abuse or trauma, should also be evaluated.

The assessment of primary care availability in Gilman must also consider the demographics of the population served. Factors like age, socioeconomic status, and cultural background can influence healthcare needs and access. Understanding the specific health challenges faced by the community is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of existing healthcare resources. This includes considering the prevalence of chronic diseases, the rates of preventative care utilization, and the health disparities that may exist within the population.

Another aspect to consider is the availability of specialized medical services. While primary care is the foundation of healthcare, access to specialists is also crucial for managing complex health conditions. This analysis should investigate the availability of specialists within the 06336 area or the proximity of specialized services in nearby regions. The presence of specialists in areas such as cardiology, endocrinology, and oncology can significantly impact the quality of care provided to patients with specific medical needs.

The affordability of healthcare is another crucial factor. The analysis should consider the acceptance of various insurance plans by local practices and hospitals. The availability of financial assistance programs for low-income patients and the transparency of healthcare costs are also important considerations. High healthcare costs can create a barrier to access, particularly for those with limited financial resources.

Finally, the overall health score for 06336 and primary care availability in Gilman must be considered in the context of the larger healthcare system. This includes considering the collaboration and coordination between different healthcare providers, the availability of community resources, and the overall health infrastructure of the region. The presence of public health initiatives, such as health education programs and disease prevention campaigns, can also contribute to the overall health of the community.

In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for doctors in 06336 and primary care availability in Gilman requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis has highlighted key factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and various other considerations. This assessment provides a foundation for understanding the healthcare landscape in this region. For a visual representation of this data and a deeper dive into the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps.