The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 06459, Middletown, Connecticut is 0 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.89 percent of the residents in 06459 has some form of health insurance. 5.67 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06459 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 178 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06459. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,166 health care providers accessible to residents in 06459, Middletown, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06459, Middletown, Connecticut
Overall Health Score | 14 |
---|---|
People Score | 0 |
Provider Score | 0 |
Hospital Score | 73 |
Travel Score | 59 |
06459 | Middletown | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 9,424.40 | 3,490.59 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 259,761.90 | 22,326.47 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 20,846.06 | 0.00 |
The health of a community is a complex tapestry woven from numerous threads: access to care, the quality of providers, the availability of specialized services, and the overall well-being of the population. In this analysis, we delve into the health landscape of Middletown, Connecticut, specifically focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians within the 06459 ZIP code. We will assess an "Overall Health Score" by examining physician-to-patient ratios, highlighting notable practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and exploring the availability of mental health resources.
Physician-to-patient ratios serve as a fundamental indicator of access to care. A low ratio, signifying fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. The national average provides a benchmark, and deviations from this norm within 06459 warrant careful consideration. Researching the precise physician-to-patient ratio for this specific area is crucial. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards should be consulted to determine the current status. If the ratio falls below the national average, it suggests a potential shortage of primary care physicians, a factor that would negatively impact the overall health score. Conversely, a higher-than-average ratio would positively influence the score, indicating greater access to care.
Beyond mere numbers, the quality and reputation of individual practices play a significant role. Identifying standout practices within 06459 requires a multi-faceted approach. Online reviews from platforms like Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google Reviews provide valuable insights into patient experiences. These reviews often highlight aspects like physician communication, wait times, staff friendliness, and overall satisfaction. Analyzing these reviews, looking for patterns and trends, can help identify practices consistently praised for their patient care. Furthermore, examining the credentials and specializations of physicians within these practices is essential. Board certifications, affiliations with reputable hospitals, and experience in specific areas of primary care (e.g., geriatric medicine, women's health) contribute to a higher quality score. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) and offering extended hours, would also positively influence the overall health score.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor in assessing the health landscape. Telemedicine, encompassing virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, has the potential to improve access to care, especially for those with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or residing in underserved areas. Evaluating the extent of telemedicine adoption within primary care practices in 06459 is essential. Are physicians offering virtual appointments? Do they utilize patient portals for communication and appointment scheduling? The availability of these services would positively impact the overall health score, reflecting a commitment to modern, accessible healthcare. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering a range of virtual services, would be ranked higher than those with limited or no telemedicine capabilities.
Mental health is an integral component of overall well-being, and the availability of mental health resources within the community directly impacts the health score. Assessing the integration of mental health services within primary care practices is crucial. Do physicians offer on-site mental health counseling or have established referral networks with mental health professionals? Proximity to mental health clinics, therapists, and psychiatrists is also a vital consideration. The presence of these resources, particularly if easily accessible and affordable, would significantly enhance the overall health score. Conversely, a scarcity of mental health services would negatively impact the score, reflecting a potential gap in care for individuals struggling with mental health issues.
To synthesize these factors into an "Overall Health Score" for primary care in 06459, a weighted approach is necessary. Each factor – physician-to-patient ratio, quality of practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. For instance, physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted heavily, reflecting its fundamental impact on access to care. Quality of practices, based on patient reviews and physician credentials, could also be given a significant weight. Telemedicine adoption and mental health resources would be weighted based on their contribution to accessibility and comprehensive care. The final score would be a composite number, reflecting the overall health of the primary care landscape in Middletown.
The analysis would conclude with a summary of findings, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care system within 06459. It would provide recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, promoting the adoption of telemedicine, and strengthening mental health services. The "Overall Health Score" would serve as a valuable benchmark, allowing for comparisons over time and guiding efforts to improve the health and well-being of the community.
For a comprehensive visual representation of the primary care landscape in Middletown, including physician locations, practice ratings, and accessibility of resources, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome. CartoChrome maps can provide a detailed, geographically-driven understanding of the health services available in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like