The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 20011, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.73 percent of the residents in 20011 has some form of health insurance. 41.30 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.73 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20011 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 15,349 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20011. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 9,162 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,453 health care providers accessible to residents in 20011, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20011, Washington, District of Columbia
Overall Health Score | 43 |
---|---|
People Score | 3 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 13 |
Travel Score | 68 |
20011 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 908.50 | 93.70 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 4,058.48 | 509.75 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 6,416.12 | 744.48 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20011 & Primary Care Availability in Washington, D.C.
Assessing the overall health landscape within ZIP Code 20011 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington, D.C., necessitates a nuanced understanding of various factors. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, explore telemedicine adoption, and examine the availability of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive ‘Overall Health Score’ assessment, painting a picture of accessibility, quality, and the overall well-being of the community.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental metric for evaluating healthcare access. In ZIP Code 20011, which encompasses neighborhoods like Petworth, Brightwood, and Crestwood, the ratio likely fluctuates. This is dependent on the concentration of medical facilities and the demographics of the population. Areas with a higher proportion of elderly residents or families with young children often experience a greater demand for primary care services. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility and a more robust healthcare infrastructure. Data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and local health departments can provide specific figures to benchmark the situation.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout primary care practices within 20011 requires evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction, the range of services offered, and the adoption of advanced technologies. Practices that prioritize patient-centered care, offering extended hours, same-day appointments, and a commitment to clear communication, tend to receive high marks. Furthermore, practices that integrate electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals enhance efficiency and allow for better coordination of care. Reputation management tools, such as online reviews and patient testimonials, can provide valuable insights into the experiences of individuals seeking primary care in the area.
Telemedicine has emerged as a crucial component of modern healthcare delivery, particularly in urban environments. The adoption rate of telemedicine among primary care providers in 20011 and throughout Washington, D.C., is a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online appointment scheduling are better positioned to serve patients with mobility limitations, busy schedules, or those who prefer the convenience of remote care. The availability of telemedicine services can significantly improve access to care, especially for individuals living in underserved areas or those facing transportation challenges. Examining the types of telemedicine platforms used, the scope of services offered virtually, and patient satisfaction with these services is essential.
Mental health is an integral aspect of overall well-being, and the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting is crucial. The integration of mental health services into primary care is becoming increasingly common, with practices offering on-site therapists, counselors, or referrals to mental health specialists. The presence of these resources within primary care practices in 20011 is a significant indicator of the community's health. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals, the types of mental health services offered, and the integration of mental health into the overall care plan is essential. This includes evaluating the availability of resources for substance abuse treatment and support groups.
Evaluating the overall health score requires a holistic approach. It involves analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio, assessing the quality of care provided by local practices, evaluating the adoption of telemedicine, and examining the availability of mental health resources. The interplay of these factors determines the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of healthcare services available to residents of 20011 and the broader Washington, D.C. community.
The overall health score for ZIP Code 20011 and primary care availability in Washington, D.C., can be visualized as a composite score. This score is derived from the weighted average of several key indicators. The physician-to-patient ratio, patient satisfaction ratings, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources are all weighted according to their relative importance. The weighting system allows for a more nuanced and accurate assessment of the health landscape. This composite score can then be used to compare 20011 with other areas of Washington, D.C., and to track progress over time.
The ongoing evaluation of the health landscape is crucial for identifying areas for improvement and ensuring that all residents have access to high-quality healthcare services. Regular assessments, incorporating data from various sources, provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system. This information can be used to inform policy decisions, allocate resources effectively, and improve the overall health and well-being of the community.
The health of a community is a dynamic entity. Constant evaluation is required to respond to the changing needs of the population. This includes tracking the impact of new technologies, addressing emerging health challenges, and ensuring equitable access to care for all residents. The ongoing monitoring of key indicators, such as the physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, allows for a proactive approach to healthcare delivery.
The ‘Overall Health Score’ for 20011 and Washington, D.C., serves as a benchmark. It helps to understand the current state of healthcare and to identify areas that need attention. This information is vital for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members. It allows for informed decision-making and the development of strategies to improve health outcomes.
Understanding the spatial distribution of healthcare resources is critical. This allows for a more targeted approach to improving healthcare access. Analyzing geographic data, such as the location of primary care practices, the demographics of the population, and the prevalence of health conditions, can reveal disparities in healthcare access. This information can then be used to direct resources to the areas that need them most.
For a deeper dive into the spatial distribution of healthcare resources in Washington, D.C., and to visualize the data discussed in this analysis, consider exploring the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. These maps offer a powerful way to understand the healthcare landscape and identify areas of need.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like