The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 20017, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.64 percent of the residents in 20017 has some form of health insurance. 36.63 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.69 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20017 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,221 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20017. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,193 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,296 health care providers accessible to residents in 20017, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20017, Washington, District of Columbia
Overall Health Score | 54 |
---|---|
People Score | 9 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 22 |
Travel Score | 68 |
20017 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 3,027.55 | 93.70 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 14,835.65 | 509.75 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 17,311.51 | 744.48 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20017 and Primary Care Availability in Washington, D.C.
Analyzing the health landscape of ZIP Code 20017, a specific area within Washington, D.C., and comparing it to the broader context of primary care availability across the entire city, necessitates a multifaceted approach. We must consider various factors, from the physician-to-patient ratio to the accessibility of specialized services like mental health, to arrive at a comprehensive ‘Overall Health Score’ analysis. This assessment will delve into the specific realities of 20017 while offering a comparative perspective on the overall health infrastructure of the nation's capital.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times, reduced access to care, and potential strain on existing healthcare providers. In 20017, the ratio is likely influenced by the presence of major hospitals and healthcare facilities, which could either inflate or deflate the apparent availability depending on the specific catchment areas and patient demographics. Washington, D.C., as a whole, faces challenges in primary care access, with certain neighborhoods experiencing shortages. This disparity underscores the importance of examining the distribution of healthcare resources and identifying areas where needs are not being adequately met.
Standout practices within 20017 and across Washington, D.C., are those that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, innovative service delivery, and community engagement. These practices often prioritize preventative care, chronic disease management, and comprehensive health education. They may also excel in coordinating care across different specialties, ensuring seamless transitions for patients with complex medical needs. Identifying these exemplary practices is crucial for understanding best practices and potentially replicating successful models in underserved areas.
Telemedicine adoption plays a significant role in enhancing healthcare accessibility, particularly for residents of 20017 and the wider Washington, D.C. area. Telemedicine offers virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online prescription refills, effectively bridging geographical barriers and improving access to care for individuals with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. The level of telemedicine integration among providers in 20017 and across the city varies. Some practices have embraced telemedicine wholeheartedly, while others are still in the early stages of adoption. The ‘Overall Health Score’ must consider the extent of telemedicine implementation and its impact on patient outcomes and satisfaction.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health and well-being. The availability of mental health services, including therapy, counseling, and psychiatric care, is a critical factor in assessing the health of a community. In 20017 and throughout Washington, D.C., access to mental health services can be challenging, with factors such as insurance coverage, stigma, and a shortage of mental health professionals contributing to barriers to care. The ‘Overall Health Score’ must reflect the availability and accessibility of mental health resources, including the presence of community-based mental health clinics, support groups, and crisis intervention services.
The socioeconomic characteristics of 20017 and the broader Washington, D.C., area significantly influence health outcomes. Factors such as income levels, educational attainment, housing quality, and access to healthy food options can all impact health. Areas with higher rates of poverty and lower educational attainment often experience poorer health outcomes. The ‘Overall Health Score’ must consider these socioeconomic determinants of health and their impact on the availability and utilization of healthcare services.
The presence of community health centers and free clinics is crucial for providing healthcare services to underserved populations in 20017 and throughout Washington, D.C. These facilities offer affordable and accessible care to individuals who may not have insurance or face other barriers to accessing traditional healthcare settings. The ‘Overall Health Score’ must account for the presence and capacity of these critical safety-net providers.
Public health initiatives and programs play a vital role in promoting health and preventing disease in 20017 and across Washington, D.C. These initiatives may include vaccination campaigns, health education programs, and disease prevention efforts. The ‘Overall Health Score’ must assess the effectiveness of these programs and their impact on community health outcomes.
The ‘Overall Health Score’ for 20017 and Washington, D.C., should also consider the diversity of the population and the cultural sensitivity of healthcare providers. Providing culturally competent care is essential for ensuring that all individuals receive equitable and respectful treatment. The ‘Overall Health Score’ must reflect the efforts of healthcare providers to address cultural and linguistic barriers to care.
Data on health outcomes, such as rates of chronic diseases, infant mortality, and life expectancy, are essential for evaluating the health of a community. These metrics provide a clear picture of the overall health status and can be used to identify areas where improvements are needed. The ‘Overall Health Score’ must incorporate these health outcome indicators to provide a comprehensive assessment.
Ultimately, the ‘Overall Health Score’ for 20017 and Washington, D.C., is a dynamic measure that reflects the complex interplay of various factors. It requires a comprehensive assessment of physician availability, access to specialized services, socioeconomic conditions, and public health initiatives. It is a multifaceted analysis.
To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas with limited access, and gain a deeper understanding of the health landscape of 20017 and Washington, D.C., we invite you to explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like