The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 20018, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.75 percent of the residents in 20018 has some form of health insurance. 40.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.28 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20018 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,180 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20018. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,285 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,097 health care providers accessible to residents in 20018, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20018, Washington, District of Columbia
Overall Health Score | 51 |
---|---|
People Score | 7 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 22 |
Travel Score | 66 |
20018 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 3,048.20 | 93.70 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 14,952.15 | 509.75 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 17,096.68 | 744.48 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20018 & Primary Care in Washington
Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 20018 and assessing primary care availability across Washington requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into key metrics, highlighting physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive health score assessment, acknowledging the complexities inherent in healthcare access and quality.
ZIP code 20018, encompassing portions of Washington, D.C., presents a unique profile. Its urban environment, coupled with a diverse population, influences healthcare needs and accessibility. The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental indicator. A higher ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests better access to care. However, this metric alone is insufficient. The distribution of specialists, the presence of underserved populations, and the availability of insurance coverage all play crucial roles.
Primary care availability in Washington as a whole, including 20018, paints a broader picture. Washington, D.C., often faces challenges related to healthcare access, particularly in specific neighborhoods. Factors like socioeconomic status, transportation limitations, and language barriers can significantly impact a resident’s ability to receive timely and appropriate care. The density of primary care practices, their acceptance of various insurance plans, and their ability to accommodate diverse patient needs are all essential considerations.
Standout practices within 20018 and across Washington deserve recognition. These practices often demonstrate exemplary patient care, innovative service delivery, and a commitment to community health. Identifying these practices involves evaluating several criteria. Patient satisfaction scores, the adoption of evidence-based practices, and the integration of technology are all critical. Furthermore, practices that actively address health disparities and provide culturally competent care should be highly regarded.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly significant, especially in recent years. The ability to consult with a physician remotely can improve access to care, particularly for those with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or residing in underserved areas. The extent of telemedicine adoption within 20018 and across Washington should be assessed, considering factors such as the availability of virtual appointments, the types of services offered remotely, and the integration of telemedicine into the overall healthcare system.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is crucial. Assessing the availability of these resources within 20018 and across Washington involves examining the number of providers, their acceptance of insurance, and the accessibility of mental health services within the community. Furthermore, the integration of mental health services into primary care settings is a key indicator of a comprehensive and patient-centered healthcare system.
The overall health score for 20018 and Washington must consider these interconnected factors. A high score would indicate a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, readily accessible primary care practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and robust mental health resources. Conversely, a low score would signal potential challenges in access, quality, and equity. The weighting of each factor will depend on the specific priorities and values of the assessment.
For 20018, the score might be influenced by its urban environment. The presence of major hospitals and medical centers could positively impact the score. However, potential disparities in access based on location within the ZIP code could negatively affect the score. The availability of public transportation and the presence of community health centers would also be crucial factors.
For Washington, the score would be influenced by the overall health infrastructure of the city. The presence of a strong network of primary care physicians, the availability of specialty care, and the integration of social services are all important. Furthermore, the city's commitment to addressing health disparities and promoting health equity would be critical.
The analysis should also consider the impact of external factors, such as public health crises, economic downturns, and policy changes. These factors can significantly influence healthcare access and quality. The assessment should be dynamic and adaptable to reflect the evolving healthcare landscape.
Ultimately, the overall health score provides a snapshot of the healthcare environment. It is a valuable tool for policymakers, healthcare providers, and residents. It can be used to identify areas for improvement, allocate resources effectively, and promote a healthier community.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 20018 and across Washington, consider exploring the detailed mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. CartoChrome can provide a visual representation of the data, allowing you to explore the distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas of need, and gain valuable insights into the overall health of the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like