20204, Washington, District of Columbia Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 20204, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20204 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20204 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20204. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 16,784 health care providers accessible to residents in 20204, Washington, District of Columbia.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20204 & Primary Care Availability in Washington

Analyzing the health landscape within ZIP Code 20204, a critical area for understanding healthcare access and quality in Washington, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and examine mental health resources, ultimately providing an "Overall Health Score" perspective. Furthermore, we'll broaden the scope to encompass primary care availability across the entire District of Columbia, revealing broader systemic trends.

The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times, reduced access to care, and potential health disparities. Within 20204, a detailed analysis of this ratio is essential. This involves identifying the number of primary care physicians, specialists, and other healthcare providers actively practicing within the ZIP code and comparing this number to the resident population. Data from the District of Columbia Department of Health, the American Medical Association, and other reputable sources are crucial for accurate calculations. The resulting ratio will be a key component of the overall health score.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of healthcare providers is equally important. Are primary care physicians concentrated in specific areas within 20204, potentially creating "healthcare deserts" for certain residents? Analyzing the geographic distribution of providers, using tools like GIS mapping, can reveal these patterns. The presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and other safety-net providers is also critical. These facilities often serve vulnerable populations and play a vital role in ensuring equitable access to care.

Identifying standout practices within 20204 is crucial for understanding best practices. This involves evaluating practices based on several factors. Patient satisfaction scores, as reported by organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), provide valuable insights into patient experiences. The adoption of innovative technologies, such as electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals, can enhance efficiency and communication. Furthermore, practices that demonstrate a commitment to preventative care, chronic disease management, and population health initiatives should be recognized.

Telemedicine adoption is a transformative trend in healthcare, particularly relevant in areas with potential access challenges. Assessing the extent of telemedicine utilization within 20204 is essential. This involves examining the availability of virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and other telehealth services offered by local providers. The impact of telemedicine on patient access, particularly for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges, should be carefully considered. Examining the availability of telemedicine for specialty care, such as mental health services, is especially important.

Mental health resources are an integral component of overall health. The availability of mental health services within 20204, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors, must be evaluated. This involves assessing the number of mental health providers, their geographic distribution, and the types of services offered. The integration of mental health services into primary care settings is also a critical factor. Early identification and treatment of mental health conditions can significantly improve overall health outcomes.

Expanding the analysis to encompass primary care availability across Washington reveals broader systemic trends. This involves assessing the physician-to-patient ratio across the entire District, identifying areas with limited access to primary care, and analyzing the factors contributing to these disparities. The impact of socioeconomic factors, such as income and education levels, on access to care should also be considered. Addressing these systemic issues requires a comprehensive approach, including policy changes, investment in healthcare infrastructure, and initiatives to promote health equity.

The District of Columbia's healthcare system is dynamic, with ongoing efforts to improve access and quality of care. The DC Health website, along with other government resources, provides valuable data on healthcare utilization, health outcomes, and other relevant indicators. Analyzing this data, alongside information from private healthcare providers and community organizations, provides a comprehensive picture of the health landscape.

The "Overall Health Score" for 20204 and primary care availability in Washington, DC, is not a single number. Instead, it is a composite assessment based on multiple factors. This includes the physician-to-patient ratio, the distribution of healthcare providers, the quality of care provided by standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The score reflects the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system, highlighting areas where improvements are needed.

The data from the DC Department of Health, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and other sources will provide the raw materials for this analysis. The goal is to provide a clear and concise picture of the health landscape, highlighting both successes and challenges. The analysis will identify areas where resources are lacking and recommend strategies for improvement.

The overall health score is not static. It is a dynamic assessment that should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare system. By monitoring key indicators and tracking progress over time, we can assess the effectiveness of interventions and identify emerging trends. The goal is to create a healthier community for all residents.

To gain a deeper understanding of the health landscape in 20204 and across Washington, consider utilizing advanced mapping tools. CartoChrome offers powerful mapping capabilities that can visualize physician distribution, identify healthcare deserts, and analyze other relevant data. This can help you to visualize the health landscape and identify areas where resources are most needed.