The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20319 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20319 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20319. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 182 health care providers accessible to residents in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia
| Overall Health Score | 56 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 1 |
| Provider Score | 99 |
| Hospital Score | 47 |
| Travel Score | 54 |
| 20319 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 44,600.00 | 93.70 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 509.75 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 744.48 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: ZIP Code 20319 & Primary Care in Washington
This analysis provides an overall health score assessment, focusing on primary care access and related health metrics within ZIP code 20319 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington. The evaluation incorporates physician-to-patient ratios, notable healthcare practices, telemedicine utilization, and the presence of mental health resources. This assessment aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
The foundation of any health score is the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In ZIP code 20319, which encompasses a specific geographic area, the physician-to-patient ratio serves as a critical indicator. A higher ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, suggests potential difficulties in accessing timely appointments and comprehensive care. This metric is then contextualized by comparing it to the average physician-to-patient ratio across Washington. This comparison highlights whether the specific ZIP code faces a more significant shortage or aligns with the state's overall healthcare access challenges.
Beyond simple ratios, the quality and reputation of existing practices are crucial. Identifying standout practices within 20319 involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction scores, the range of services offered, and the adoption of innovative healthcare models. These practices often serve as benchmarks for the quality of care available. The presence of board-certified physicians and specialists, as well as the accreditation status of the facilities, further contribute to the overall health score. Examining the integration of these practices with larger healthcare networks or hospitals also provides insight into the coordination of care and the potential for seamless transitions between different levels of healthcare.
Telemedicine has emerged as a significant factor in healthcare accessibility, especially in areas with limited physical access to providers. The degree of telemedicine adoption within 20319, and across Washington, is a key element of the analysis. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring services, and the use of digital platforms for patient communication. Practices that actively embrace telemedicine can potentially mitigate the challenges posed by geographic limitations and improve patient convenience. The integration of telemedicine with existing primary care services is also assessed, as this integration can enhance the continuity of care.
Mental health resources are an integral component of overall health. The analysis considers the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within 20319. This includes assessing the presence of mental health clinics, the integration of mental health services into primary care practices, and the availability of crisis intervention services. The ability to access mental health support is essential for overall well-being, and its availability significantly impacts the health score. The examination also extends to the availability of support groups and community-based mental health programs.
Washington, as a state, has its own set of challenges and opportunities concerning primary care. The analysis considers state-level initiatives aimed at improving access to care, such as programs to incentivize healthcare providers to practice in underserved areas or policies that promote the expansion of telehealth services. The broader healthcare landscape in Washington, including the presence of major hospitals, research institutions, and healthcare networks, plays a significant role in shaping the overall health score. Furthermore, the analysis considers the socioeconomic factors that influence health outcomes within the state, such as income levels, education attainment, and access to healthy food options.
The overall health score for 20319, therefore, is not a static number but a complex assessment based on the interplay of various factors. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of existing practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the broader healthcare context within Washington. The final score reflects the relative strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system within the ZIP code, highlighting areas where access to care is adequate and where improvements are needed. This score is a dynamic measure that can change over time as the healthcare landscape evolves.
The analysis also considers the demographics of the population residing in 20319. Factors such as age distribution, ethnic diversity, and the prevalence of chronic diseases can influence the demand for healthcare services and the specific needs of the population. Understanding these demographic characteristics is crucial for tailoring healthcare delivery to meet the specific needs of the community. The analysis also assesses the presence of community health centers and other safety-net providers, which often serve vulnerable populations and play a critical role in ensuring access to care.
The evaluation of telemedicine adoption includes assessing the types of services offered remotely, such as virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and the use of digital tools for patient education. The ease of use of telemedicine platforms and the availability of technical support for patients are also considered. The analysis also examines the integration of telemedicine with existing healthcare systems, including the sharing of patient information and the coordination of care between virtual and in-person providers. The goal is to assess how effectively telemedicine is being used to improve access to care and enhance patient outcomes.
The assessment of mental health resources goes beyond simply counting the number of providers. It also considers the types of services offered, such as individual therapy, group therapy, and medication management. The analysis examines the availability of specialized mental health services, such as treatment for substance use disorders and eating disorders. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices is also assessed, as this can improve access to care and reduce the stigma associated with mental illness. The overall aim is to determine whether the mental health resources available adequately meet the needs of the population.
The overall health score is not just a measure of healthcare access; it is also a reflection of the overall health and well-being of the community. The analysis considers factors such as the prevalence of chronic diseases, the rates of preventable hospitalizations, and the overall health outcomes of the population. The goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare system and its impact on the health of the community. The analysis also considers the role of public health initiatives, such as vaccination programs and health education campaigns, in improving overall health outcomes.
The final health score is a dynamic measure that reflects the ongoing efforts to improve healthcare access and quality. It is designed to be a useful tool for policymakers, healthcare providers, and community members alike. The analysis provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system, highlighting areas where improvements are needed. It also serves as a benchmark for tracking progress over time and evaluating the impact of healthcare initiatives. The ultimate goal is to create a healthier community.
For a more detailed and visually rich understanding of the healthcare landscape in 20319 and across Washington, including the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and demographic data, explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
