The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 20560, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20560 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20560 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 7 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20560. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,546 health care providers accessible to residents in 20560, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20560, Washington, District of Columbia
Overall Health Score | 63 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 58 |
20560 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 93.70 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 509.27 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 740.39 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20560 and Primary Care Availability in Washington
Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 20560 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and examine mental health resource accessibility. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the health ecosystem, revealing both strengths and areas needing improvement.
ZIP code 20560, primarily encompassing the U.S. Department of State headquarters, presents a unique demographic. The population is largely comprised of government employees, diplomats, and their families. This creates a specific set of healthcare needs, potentially including specialized care for international health concerns and access to medical professionals familiar with global health protocols. Furthermore, the population may have varying levels of access to private insurance and government-sponsored healthcare programs, which would significantly influence their choice of providers.
Evaluating physician-to-patient ratios in this ZIP code is crucial. The density of physicians, particularly primary care physicians, is a key indicator of access to care. A low physician-to-patient ratio suggests greater accessibility, shorter wait times, and potentially more personalized care. Conversely, a high ratio can indicate limited access, leading to longer wait times, reduced appointment availability, and potentially, delayed or inadequate care. Data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and other relevant sources should be consulted to obtain accurate physician-to-patient ratio data.
The availability of primary care in Washington, as a whole, provides a broader context. Washington, like many states, faces challenges in primary care access, particularly in rural areas. Factors such as geographic distribution of physicians, insurance coverage rates, and the availability of specialists all contribute to the overall picture. Analyzing primary care availability requires examining the distribution of physicians across the state, identifying areas with physician shortages, and evaluating the impact of these shortages on patient health outcomes.
Identifying standout practices within ZIP code 20560 and the broader Washington landscape is essential. These practices often demonstrate innovative approaches to patient care, high patient satisfaction rates, and positive health outcomes. Factors to consider include the use of electronic health records (EHRs), patient-centered care models, and a commitment to preventative care. Examining patient reviews, quality metrics (such as those provided by the National Committee for Quality Assurance), and practice accreditations can help identify these exemplary practices.
Telemedicine adoption is a critical component of modern healthcare delivery. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas. Assessing telemedicine adoption within ZIP code 20560 and across Washington involves examining the availability of telehealth services, the types of services offered, and the level of patient and provider engagement. Furthermore, evaluating the impact of telemedicine on patient outcomes and healthcare costs is crucial.
Mental health resources are an integral part of overall health. Access to mental health services, including therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups, is vital for addressing the growing prevalence of mental health conditions. Assessing mental health resource availability involves examining the number of mental health providers, the availability of mental health services within primary care settings, and the integration of mental health services with physical health care. Furthermore, evaluating the availability of crisis intervention services and the accessibility of mental health services for specific populations, such as veterans or individuals with disabilities, is crucial.
The specific demographics of ZIP code 20560, including the presence of international populations, may require specialized mental health resources. This could include providers with expertise in cross-cultural communication, trauma-informed care, and the unique mental health challenges faced by individuals living and working abroad.
The overall health score for doctors in ZIP code 20560 and primary care availability in Washington is complex and multifaceted. It necessitates a thorough examination of physician-to-patient ratios, the identification of standout practices, an assessment of telemedicine adoption, and an evaluation of mental health resources. The findings will reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem, providing valuable insights for healthcare providers, policymakers, and residents alike.
By analyzing these factors, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the health landscape in the region, identifying areas where access to care is strong and areas where improvements are needed. This will help to promote better health outcomes for all residents. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the complex interplay of factors that influence health outcomes.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like