The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 30024, Suwanee, Georgia is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.24 percent of the residents in 30024 has some form of health insurance. 14.77 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 83.63 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30024 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 24,704 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 34 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30024. An estimate of 6 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 7,333 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,927 health care providers accessible to residents in 30024, Suwanee, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30024, Suwanee, Georgia
Overall Health Score | 56 |
---|---|
People Score | 44 |
Provider Score | 59 |
Hospital Score | 19 |
Travel Score | 78 |
30024 | Suwanee | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 646.64 | 3,477.65 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 2,346.56 | 12,644.07 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 7,059.22 | 38,627.19 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 30024 and Primary Care Availability in Suwanee
Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP Code 30024, encompassing the city of Suwanee, Georgia, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will assess the availability and quality of primary care physicians, the integration of technology, and the presence of vital mental health resources. We will strive to provide a comprehensive ‘Overall Health Score’ assessment, recognizing that such a score is complex and relies on various data points.
One crucial element in evaluating healthcare access is the physician-to-patient ratio. In Suwanee, the ratio can fluctuate, but a generally accepted benchmark for primary care is a ratio that allows physicians to effectively manage patient loads while maintaining quality of care. A favorable ratio, meaning more physicians per capita, typically translates to shorter wait times for appointments and greater accessibility. Conversely, a higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians relative to the population, might indicate challenges in securing timely appointments and potentially lead to a strain on existing healthcare resources. Accurate data on the specific physician-to-patient ratio in 30024 requires access to updated, localized datasets, which can be difficult to obtain in real time. However, publicly available data from organizations like the Georgia Department of Public Health and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) can provide valuable insights into broader regional trends and physician supply.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within 30024 involves evaluating factors like patient satisfaction, the range of services offered, and the integration of preventative care measures. Practices that prioritize patient communication, offer extended hours, and utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to streamline care delivery often receive higher ratings. Reviews on platforms like Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google Reviews can provide valuable insights into patient experiences. Furthermore, accreditation by organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) can be an indicator of a practice's commitment to quality standards. The presence of board-certified physicians and the availability of specialized services, such as chronic disease management programs, also contribute to a practice's overall quality assessment.
The adoption of telemedicine is another key factor in evaluating the health landscape. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly enhance access to care, particularly for individuals with mobility limitations or those residing in underserved areas. Practices that actively embrace telemedicine offer greater convenience and can improve patient engagement. The availability of telehealth services for both routine check-ups and specialized consultations, such as mental health therapy, is a positive indicator. The ease of use of these platforms, the availability of technical support, and the integration with existing EHR systems are crucial for successful telemedicine implementation.
Mental health resources are an integral part of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within 30024 is a critical factor. The presence of mental health clinics, counseling services, and support groups contributes to a robust mental healthcare ecosystem. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices, allowing for early screening and intervention, is highly beneficial. Furthermore, access to crisis intervention services and mental health support for children and adolescents is essential. The availability of these resources can be assessed through directories of mental health providers, community health centers, and local government websites.
To assess the overall health score, we must synthesize these elements. The score would be a composite metric reflecting the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices (based on patient reviews, accreditation, and service offerings), the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. A higher score would indicate a more favorable health landscape, with greater access to quality care and a comprehensive approach to patient well-being. A lower score would suggest potential challenges, such as physician shortages, limited access to specialized services, or a lack of mental health support.
The ‘Overall Health Score’ is not a static value. It is a dynamic measure that can change over time, reflecting shifts in population demographics, healthcare infrastructure, and technological advancements. Regular monitoring and analysis are essential to identify areas for improvement and ensure that the healthcare needs of the community are being met.
The assessment of primary care availability in Suwanee also necessitates an understanding of the broader healthcare ecosystem. The presence of hospitals, urgent care centers, and specialty clinics within the vicinity of 30024 contributes to the overall health landscape. Access to these facilities, along with the availability of transportation options, plays a role in determining the accessibility of care for residents. Partnerships between primary care practices and specialists can improve care coordination and facilitate referrals.
The integration of data analytics and technology is increasingly important in healthcare. Analyzing patient data to identify trends, predict health risks, and personalize care can improve outcomes. Practices that leverage data analytics and invest in health IT infrastructure are often better equipped to provide efficient and effective care.
In conclusion, evaluating the overall health score for doctors in ZIP Code 30024 and primary care availability in Suwanee requires a comprehensive assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This analysis underscores the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure that the healthcare needs of the community are being met.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Suwanee and surrounding areas, including the location of medical facilities, physician density, and demographic data, explore CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps offer a powerful tool for understanding the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and identifying areas of need.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like