The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 30084, Tucker, Georgia is 81 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 83.08 percent of the residents in 30084 has some form of health insurance. 29.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30084 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 8,036 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 21 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30084. An estimate of 23 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,312 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 42,647 health care providers accessible to residents in 30084, Tucker, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30084, Tucker, Georgia
Overall Health Score | 44 |
---|---|
People Score | 29 |
Provider Score | 81 |
Hospital Score | 12 |
Travel Score | 62 |
30084 | Tucker | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 2,081.27 | 7,529.65 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 10,561.84 | 38,264.47 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 11,974.93 | 43,648.73 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Tucker, GA (ZIP Code 30084)
Assessing the overall health landscape within Tucker, Georgia (ZIP code 30084) necessitates a multifaceted analysis, moving beyond simple metrics to encompass the availability, accessibility, and quality of healthcare resources. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and assess the availability of mental health resources. Ultimately, a holistic 'Overall Health Score' will be derived, providing a nuanced understanding of the community's healthcare ecosystem.
The foundation of any health assessment lies in the physician-to-patient ratio. In Tucker, the ratio reflects the balance between the population size and the number of practicing physicians, particularly primary care physicians (PCPs). A low ratio, signifying fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a high ratio suggests greater accessibility and potentially better health outcomes. Data collection and analysis from sources like the Georgia Composite Medical Board and the US Census Bureau are crucial to ascertain the current physician-to-patient ratio within 30084. This analysis should consider the number of active PCPs, including general practitioners, internists, and family medicine specialists, relative to the population size of Tucker.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of physicians across different specialties is critical. While primary care is the cornerstone of preventative care, the availability of specialists, such as cardiologists, endocrinologists, and gastroenterologists, significantly impacts the ability of residents to receive comprehensive care. A community with a limited number of specialists may require residents to travel outside of Tucker for specialized treatments, increasing the burden on patients and potentially delaying necessary care. The analysis should identify the presence and distribution of various specialist physicians within the ZIP code.
Identifying standout practices within Tucker is essential to understanding the quality of care available. This involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction, physician experience, accreditation status, and the range of services offered. Practices with a strong reputation for patient care, a commitment to preventative medicine, and a focus on patient education should be highlighted. Reviews from reputable sources, such as Healthgrades or Vitals, can provide valuable insights into patient experiences. Furthermore, the analysis should consider whether practices are accepting new patients and the availability of same-day appointments, which are crucial factors in accessibility.
Telemedicine adoption is transforming healthcare delivery, particularly in areas with limited access to care. The analysis should assess the extent to which practices in Tucker have embraced telemedicine. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring services, and online patient portals. Practices that offer telemedicine options can improve access to care, reduce travel time for patients, and enhance convenience. The adoption rate of telemedicine within Tucker should be compared to regional and national averages to gauge its relative progress.
Mental health resources are an integral component of overall well-being. The analysis should assess the availability of mental health services within Tucker, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. It is important to determine the number of mental health professionals per capita and the types of services offered, such as individual therapy, group therapy, and medication management. Furthermore, the analysis should examine the presence of mental health support groups, crisis intervention services, and partnerships with local organizations. Access to mental health services is critical for addressing the growing prevalence of mental health conditions and promoting overall well-being.
The 'Overall Health Score' for Tucker, GA (30084) is a composite metric that reflects the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem. This score will be determined by weighting the factors discussed above, including physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialists, the quality of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. Each factor will be assigned a score based on its performance within the community. The weighted average of these scores will determine the final 'Overall Health Score'. This score will provide a snapshot of the community's healthcare landscape, helping to identify areas for improvement and informing healthcare planning initiatives.
The accessibility of primary care is a key factor in the overall health score. The analysis should assess the number of primary care physicians accepting new patients, the wait times for appointments, and the availability of after-hours care. Practices that prioritize patient access and convenience will contribute positively to the overall score. The analysis should also consider the presence of community health centers or other safety-net providers that serve the underserved populations within Tucker.
The analysis should also consider the demographic makeup of Tucker. Factors like age, income, and ethnicity can influence health outcomes and access to care. The analysis should identify any disparities in healthcare access or outcomes among different demographic groups and suggest strategies to address these disparities. This may involve targeted outreach programs, culturally sensitive care, or the establishment of healthcare services in underserved areas.
The physical environment can also impact the health of a community. The analysis should consider the availability of green spaces, parks, and recreational facilities within Tucker. Access to these amenities can promote physical activity, reduce stress, and improve overall well-being. The analysis should also assess the environmental quality of the community, including air and water quality, and identify any potential health hazards.
The final 'Overall Health Score' should be presented in a clear and concise manner, using a rating scale or other visual representation. The analysis should also include recommendations for improving the healthcare landscape in Tucker. These recommendations may include strategies for recruiting more physicians, expanding telemedicine services, increasing access to mental health resources, or addressing health disparities. The goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment that informs healthcare planning and promotes the health and well-being of the community.
The assessment of primary care availability should be conducted in conjunction with an evaluation of the broader healthcare infrastructure in Tucker. This includes an assessment of local hospitals, urgent care centers, and specialty clinics. The analysis should consider the quality of care provided by these facilities, their accessibility, and their ability to meet the healthcare needs of the community. The analysis should also consider the presence of any healthcare partnerships or collaborations between different providers.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Tucker, and to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize data, identify trends, and make informed decisions about healthcare planning and resource allocation. Explore the power of spatial analysis and gain a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Tucker.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like