30161, Rome, Georgia Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 30161, Rome, Georgia is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 81.47 percent of the residents in 30161 has some form of health insurance. 37.28 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30161 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 8,269 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30161. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,316 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,869 health care providers accessible to residents in 30161, Rome, Georgia.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Rome, GA (ZIP Code 30161)

Analyzing the overall health landscape for residents within ZIP code 30161, encompassing Rome, Georgia, requires a multifaceted approach. It involves scrutinizing the availability and quality of primary care physicians, assessing physician-to-patient ratios, evaluating the adoption of innovative healthcare delivery methods like telemedicine, and examining the accessibility of mental health resources. This analysis aims to provide an ‘Overall Health Score’ reflecting the current state of healthcare within this specific geographic area.

One of the fundamental indicators of a healthy community is the availability of primary care physicians. Access to these physicians is the gateway to preventative care, early diagnosis, and effective management of chronic conditions. In Rome, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. While precise, up-to-the-minute data fluctuates, generally, the ratio is an area of concern. The national average often presents a more favorable picture. This means residents may face challenges in securing timely appointments and establishing consistent relationships with their primary care providers. This can lead to delayed diagnoses and potentially poorer health outcomes.

Several practices within 30161 stand out for their commitment to patient care and innovative approaches. These practices often prioritize patient-centered care, focusing on building strong doctor-patient relationships and providing comprehensive services. They may offer extended hours, same-day appointments, or specialized programs tailored to the needs of specific patient populations. Identifying these standout practices requires careful consideration of factors like patient reviews, quality metrics (if available), and the range of services offered. Investigating the practices’ commitment to preventative care, such as regular screenings and vaccinations, is also essential.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor in evaluating the health score. The ability to access healthcare services remotely, through video consultations, phone calls, and secure messaging, can significantly improve access, especially for residents with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or those living in rural areas. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care providers in 30161 is crucial. This involves determining the availability of virtual appointments, the types of services offered remotely, and the ease of use of the telemedicine platforms. The degree to which these technologies are integrated into daily practice significantly impacts the overall health score.

Mental health resources are an integral component of overall well-being. The availability of mental health services, including psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors, is a vital factor. Examining the number of mental health professionals per capita, the wait times for appointments, and the range of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management) is essential. Furthermore, evaluating the integration of mental health services within primary care practices, such as on-site counseling or referral networks, is crucial. The presence of community mental health centers and support groups also contributes to the overall health score.

The quality of care is a subjective concept. It is essential to consider various factors, including patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines. Patient reviews and testimonials can provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Furthermore, analyzing data on chronic disease management, preventative care rates, and hospital readmission rates can offer a more objective assessment of the quality of care provided by primary care physicians in 30161.

The presence of specialized care options is also relevant. While the focus is on primary care, access to specialists, such as cardiologists, endocrinologists, and gastroenterologists, is important. The proximity of specialists, the availability of referrals, and the ease of access to specialized services all contribute to the overall health score.

The socioeconomic factors of the population within 30161 also play a role. The prevalence of chronic diseases, the rates of health insurance coverage, and the levels of health literacy can significantly impact the overall health score. Addressing health disparities and ensuring equitable access to healthcare services for all residents is a priority.

The overall health score for 30161 is a complex metric. It is determined by a combination of factors, including physician availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the quality of care. While some practices may excel in certain areas, the overall score may be impacted by challenges in other areas, such as the physician-to-patient ratio.

The score can be improved by increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, enhancing mental health resources, and addressing health disparities. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential to track progress and identify areas for improvement. Collaboration among healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government is crucial to creating a healthier community.

In conclusion, evaluating the health landscape of Rome, Georgia (30161) reveals both strengths and weaknesses. The physician-to-patient ratio, while a concern, can be mitigated by the adoption of telemedicine and the presence of dedicated practices. The availability of mental health resources and the integration of mental health services within primary care practices are also important considerations. Understanding these factors is crucial for residents seeking healthcare and for healthcare providers looking to improve their services.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 30161 and visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider using interactive mapping tools. **CartoChrome maps** can provide detailed visualizations of physician locations, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data, enabling a more comprehensive assessment of the overall health score and facilitating informed decision-making.