The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 30165, Rome, Georgia is 50 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 83.39 percent of the residents in 30165 has some form of health insurance. 36.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30165 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 11,026 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30165. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,174 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,715 health care providers accessible to residents in 30165, Rome, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30165, Rome, Georgia
Overall Health Score | 30 |
---|---|
People Score | 10 |
Provider Score | 50 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 66 |
30165 | Rome | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 209.53 | 3,465.11 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 818.01 | 14,284.62 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 1,348.81 | 19,797.16 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Rome, GA (ZIP Code 30165) and Primary Care Availability
Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 30165 (Rome, Georgia) and assessing primary care availability requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive ‘Overall Health Score’ assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental indicator of healthcare accessibility. In Rome, the ratio is likely influenced by factors like the presence of a regional medical center and the surrounding rural areas. A lower ratio (more physicians per capita) generally suggests better access to care, shorter wait times, and potentially more comprehensive services. Conversely, a higher ratio could indicate challenges in securing timely appointments, especially for primary care. Data from sources like the Georgia Department of Public Health and the American Medical Association would be crucial in determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio for 30165. This ratio would be compared to state and national averages to gauge the relative strength of Rome's primary care infrastructure.
Standout practices significantly influence the overall health score. These practices often excel in providing high-quality care, patient satisfaction, and innovative service delivery models. Identifying these practices involves analyzing patient reviews, surveying local healthcare professionals, and examining performance metrics. Factors such as accreditation by recognized bodies (e.g., the Joint Commission), the use of electronic health records (EHRs), and participation in quality improvement initiatives contribute to a practice's standing. Practices that prioritize preventative care, offer specialized services, and demonstrate a commitment to community outreach would be considered particularly strong contributors to the overall health score. The presence of these high-performing practices elevates the quality of care available to residents.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of the analysis. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth services, and its impact on Rome's healthcare landscape is worth examining. The availability of virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and online appointment scheduling significantly enhances access to care, especially for those with mobility issues or residing in remote areas. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves determining the number of practices offering telehealth services, the types of services offered, and patient utilization rates. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflows, offering a seamless and user-friendly experience, contribute positively to the overall health score.
Mental health resources are a crucial component of a comprehensive healthcare system. The availability of mental health services, including psychiatrists, therapists, and counseling centers, directly impacts the well-being of the community. Assessing mental health resources involves identifying the number of mental health providers in the area, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services (e.g., insurance acceptance, wait times). Furthermore, examining the presence of crisis intervention services, support groups, and mental health awareness programs provides a more holistic view of the community's mental health support network. Adequate mental health resources are essential for addressing the complex needs of the population and contributing to a higher overall health score.
The interplay between these factors determines the overall health score for 30165. A strong score would reflect a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of high-performing practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and robust mental health resources. Conversely, a weaker score would indicate challenges in one or more of these areas. The analysis should also consider demographic factors, such as age, income, and ethnicity, to identify disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. For instance, specific populations might face greater barriers to accessing care, which would negatively impact the overall health score.
Improving the overall health score requires a collaborative effort involving healthcare providers, policymakers, community organizations, and individuals. Strategies for improvement could include: recruiting and retaining healthcare professionals, expanding telemedicine capabilities, increasing access to mental health services, and promoting preventative care initiatives. Data-driven decision-making is crucial for identifying areas for improvement and implementing effective interventions. Regular monitoring and evaluation of the health landscape are necessary to track progress and adapt strategies as needed.
The analysis should also consider the influence of external factors on the healthcare landscape. Economic conditions, social determinants of health, and public health emergencies can all impact healthcare access and outcomes. Understanding these factors is essential for developing a comprehensive and sustainable approach to improving the overall health score. The analysis should also consider the impact of healthcare policies and regulations on the local healthcare system.
This assessment provides a snapshot of the current health status in Rome, GA (30165). It highlights the critical elements that contribute to a robust healthcare ecosystem and identifies areas that require attention and investment. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system, stakeholders can work together to create a healthier community.
Want to visualize this data and explore the healthcare landscape of Rome, GA, in detail? Explore the power of location intelligence with CartoChrome maps. Discover physician locations, service availability, and population demographics, all in an interactive and intuitive format.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like