The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 30184, White, Georgia is 32 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.54 percent of the residents in 30184 has some form of health insurance. 28.54 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.08 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30184 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,812 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30184. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,227 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,467 health care providers accessible to residents in 30184, White, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30184, White, Georgia
Overall Health Score | 58 |
---|---|
People Score | 67 |
Provider Score | 32 |
Hospital Score | 58 |
Travel Score | 46 |
30184 | White | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 4,875.64 | 38,481.45 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 19,532.16 | 153,959.06 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 26,943.77 | 210,570.50 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in 30184 and Primary Care Availability in White, GA
This analysis provides an overview of the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 30184, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians, particularly in relation to the town of White, Georgia. We will examine various factors contributing to an "Overall Health Score," including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the accessibility of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment and highlight areas of strength and weakness.
The foundation of a healthy community rests on accessible and competent primary care. In 30184, understanding the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. This metric reflects the number of residents per primary care physician (PCP). A higher ratio suggests a potential shortage, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially strained resources. Data from various sources, including the Georgia Composite Medical Board and the U.S. Census Bureau, needs to be analyzed to determine the precise ratio. It's important to note that this ratio can fluctuate depending on the specific definition of "primary care physician" (e.g., including family medicine, internal medicine, and general practitioners).
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care provided by these physicians is paramount. Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating several criteria. These include patient satisfaction ratings, gleaned from online reviews and surveys, as well as the adoption of evidence-based practices. Practices demonstrating a commitment to preventative care, chronic disease management, and comprehensive patient education often receive higher marks. Furthermore, the presence of board-certified physicians and the availability of specialized services within the practice contribute to the overall assessment.
The modern healthcare landscape is increasingly shaped by technology, and telemedicine plays a significant role in expanding access to care. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care physicians in 30184 is a key factor. Telemedicine offers several advantages, including reduced travel time, increased convenience, and the potential to reach patients in underserved areas. Assessing the availability of virtual appointments, the types of services offered via telemedicine (e.g., consultations, follow-ups), and the ease of use of the platforms are all critical considerations. Practices that embrace telemedicine are often better positioned to serve a wider patient population.
Mental health is an integral component of overall well-being, and the availability of mental health resources in conjunction with primary care is essential. The analysis should investigate the presence of mental health professionals (e.g., psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists) within the primary care practices or in close proximity. The integration of mental health services into primary care, such as screening for mental health conditions and providing brief interventions, is a positive indicator. Furthermore, the accessibility of mental health support services, such as crisis hotlines and community mental health centers, contributes to a more robust healthcare ecosystem.
The town of White, GA, is a critical focus within this analysis. The availability of primary care physicians *within* White, or in close proximity, is a significant factor. Residents in more rural areas may face greater challenges in accessing healthcare. The distance to the nearest primary care practice, the availability of transportation, and the ability to accommodate patients with disabilities are all relevant considerations. The analysis needs to determine if White, GA, is a “healthcare desert.”
Evaluating the accessibility of specialists is also important. While primary care physicians are the first point of contact, patients often need referrals to specialists. The proximity of specialists (e.g., cardiologists, endocrinologists, dermatologists) to 30184 and White, GA, and the ease with which patients can obtain referrals, influence the overall health score. The availability of specialized care within a reasonable distance reduces the burden on patients and improves health outcomes.
The overall health score is not a static number but a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape. Regular updates are necessary to account for changes in physician availability, the adoption of new technologies, and the expansion of mental health services. This score should also consider demographic data, such as the age distribution of the population and the prevalence of chronic diseases, to provide a more comprehensive picture of the community's healthcare needs.
To arrive at a comprehensive "Overall Health Score," data from multiple sources must be integrated. This includes information from government agencies (e.g., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), healthcare providers, insurance companies, and patient feedback platforms. The data should be analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and areas of concern. The score should be presented in a clear and concise manner, with supporting data and explanations.
The analysis needs to consider the role of health insurance coverage. The percentage of residents with health insurance, the types of insurance plans available, and the affordability of healthcare services all affect the overall health score. Areas with high rates of uninsured residents may face significant challenges in accessing care, leading to poorer health outcomes.
In conclusion, assessing the healthcare landscape in 30184 and White, GA, requires a multifaceted approach. By examining physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and assessing the availability of mental health resources, a more accurate "Overall Health Score" can be determined. This score serves as a valuable tool for understanding the healthcare environment and identifying areas for improvement.
Are you looking for a visual representation of this data? Do you want to explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources in 30184 and White, GA? **Visit CartoChrome maps to visualize and analyze the healthcare landscape.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like