The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 30213, Fairburn, Georgia is 49 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.98 percent of the residents in 30213 has some form of health insurance. 31.82 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30213 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 15,012 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30213. An estimate of 6 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,036 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,810 health care providers accessible to residents in 30213, Fairburn, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30213, Fairburn, Georgia
Overall Health Score | 14 |
---|---|
People Score | 8 |
Provider Score | 49 |
Hospital Score | 23 |
Travel Score | 52 |
30213 | Fairburn | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 1,816.00 | 6,674.99 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 5,879.99 | 21,601.40 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 24,547.18 | 90,218.49 | 0.00 |
**Overall Health Score Analysis: Fairburn, GA (ZIP Code 30213)**
Analyzing the overall health landscape of Fairburn, Georgia (ZIP code 30213) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers various factors, including physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and the accessibility of mental health resources. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview, culminating in a potential health score assessment.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of doctors relative to the population, can lead to appointment delays, reduced access to preventative care, and overall poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a high ratio suggests greater access to medical professionals. Publicly available data, such as that provided by the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), would be essential to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio within 30213. This data, however, is often broad and may not fully reflect the nuances of primary care specifically.
Primary care availability is crucial. It acts as the gateway to the healthcare system. A robust primary care infrastructure allows for early detection of illnesses, management of chronic conditions, and preventative care. Assessing primary care availability involves examining the number of family medicine physicians, internal medicine specialists, and pediatricians practicing within the ZIP code. Furthermore, the acceptance of new patients by these physicians is a key factor. A practice that isn't accepting new patients limits access for new residents or those seeking a change in care.
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. Patient reviews, insurance acceptance, and the range of services offered are all important. Practices that have consistently positive patient feedback, accept a wide range of insurance plans, and offer comprehensive services (e.g., on-site lab work, radiology) are typically considered higher quality. This assessment would involve researching individual practices, examining online reviews (e.g., Google, Healthgrades), and contacting the practices directly to gather information.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, especially in areas where access to care may be limited. Practices that offer telemedicine options, such as virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for those with mobility issues, transportation challenges, or busy schedules. The extent of telemedicine adoption within 30213 would involve surveying local practices to determine the availability and types of telemedicine services offered.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. Access to mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is critical for addressing mental health concerns. The availability of these resources within 30213 would be assessed by identifying mental health providers in the area, determining their insurance acceptance, and evaluating the range of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management). Furthermore, the presence of community mental health centers or other support services would be considered.
The overall health score would be a composite metric, reflecting the weighted average of these factors. The physician-to-patient ratio and primary care availability would likely carry the most weight, followed by the quality of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The specific weights assigned to each factor would depend on their perceived importance and the availability of reliable data.
For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is low, the overall score would be negatively impacted. Conversely, a high concentration of high-quality practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources would positively influence the score.
Specific examples of practices in Fairburn, GA (30213) would need to be researched. This would involve identifying practices, reviewing their websites, and compiling information on their services, insurance acceptance, and patient reviews. It is crucial to note that this analysis is a snapshot in time, and the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving.
The analysis would also need to address potential disparities in healthcare access. Factors such as socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity can significantly impact health outcomes. Identifying and addressing these disparities is an essential part of improving the overall health of the community. This would involve analyzing demographic data and assessing whether healthcare resources are equitably distributed.
Furthermore, the analysis would consider the presence of any specific health challenges within the community. For example, if there is a high prevalence of diabetes or heart disease, the availability of specialists and programs focused on these conditions would be particularly important.
The final health score would be presented in a clear and concise manner, along with a summary of the key findings and recommendations for improvement. This might include suggestions for increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, or improving access to mental health resources.
The process of gathering and analyzing this data is complex and requires significant effort. It involves accessing publicly available data, conducting primary research, and synthesizing information from various sources. It also requires a deep understanding of the healthcare system and the factors that influence health outcomes.
The analysis would not only identify the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in Fairburn, GA (30213) but also provide valuable insights for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers. This information can be used to improve healthcare access, quality, and outcomes for the entire community.
Ultimately, a comprehensive analysis of the healthcare landscape in Fairburn, GA (30213) requires a detailed, data-driven approach. It is an ongoing process, requiring constant monitoring and adaptation to reflect the ever-changing healthcare environment.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Fairburn, GA (30213), and explore the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. Their interactive mapping capabilities can provide a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing the data discussed in this analysis.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like