The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 30216, Flovilla, Georgia is 6 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.14 percent of the residents in 30216 has some form of health insurance. 47.57 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30216 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 394 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30216. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 582 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 546 health care providers accessible to residents in 30216, Flovilla, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30216, Flovilla, Georgia
Overall Health Score | 3 |
---|---|
People Score | 18 |
Provider Score | 6 |
Hospital Score | 27 |
Travel Score | 37 |
30216 | Flovilla | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 781.17 | 152,288.43 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 4,394.37 | 852,704.23 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 2,663.23 | 510,257.73 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 30216 & Primary Care Availability in Flovilla
Flovilla, Georgia, nestled within ZIP Code 30216, presents a unique microcosm for evaluating healthcare accessibility and quality. Assessing the overall health score for the area necessitates a multifaceted approach, considering factors beyond just the number of physicians. This analysis delves into physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, painting a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental indicator of access. While precise, up-to-the-minute figures fluctuate, data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards can provide estimates. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, often signals potential challenges in securing timely appointments and receiving continuous care. In 30216, the ratio may be impacted by the rural nature of the area. This can lead to greater distances for patients to travel to see a doctor, potentially impacting preventative care and management of chronic conditions.
The presence of standout practices significantly elevates the overall health score. These practices often demonstrate excellence in patient care, innovative approaches, and a commitment to community health. Identifying such practices involves examining patient reviews, accreditations (such as those from the Joint Commission), and the range of services offered. Do they offer extended hours? Do they have specialized services, such as diabetes education or geriatric care? The existence of practices with a strong reputation for patient satisfaction and comprehensive services directly contributes to a higher health score.
Telemedicine adoption is a crucial element in modern healthcare, especially in rural areas. It expands access by eliminating geographical barriers. Examining the availability of telehealth services among local physicians is essential. Do doctors offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, or online patient portals? The degree to which practices have embraced telemedicine technologies demonstrates a commitment to patient convenience and proactive care, particularly for follow-up appointments and managing chronic conditions. The absence of telemedicine options, conversely, can significantly lower the health score, especially for those with mobility issues or transportation limitations.
Mental health resources are an increasingly critical component of overall health. Assessing the availability of mental health services within 30216 is paramount. Are there psychiatrists, psychologists, or licensed therapists practicing locally? Does the area have access to mental health clinics or support groups? The presence of these resources, and the ease with which patients can access them, directly impacts the health score. A lack of mental health services, or significant wait times to see a mental health professional, can negatively affect the health and well-being of the community.
Beyond the direct availability of physicians and mental health professionals, the health score also considers the broader healthcare ecosystem. This includes the presence of urgent care facilities, pharmacies, and access to specialist referrals. Are there nearby hospitals equipped to handle a range of medical needs? Is there a strong network of support services for patients with chronic illnesses? The strength of this broader network directly impacts the ability of residents to receive comprehensive and coordinated care.
A critical aspect of evaluating the health score involves considering the demographics of the population. The age distribution, socioeconomic status, and prevalence of chronic diseases within 30216 can significantly influence healthcare needs. An older population, for example, may require more geriatric care, while a population with a higher prevalence of diabetes may need access to specialized diabetes management programs. Understanding the specific needs of the community is crucial for a nuanced health score assessment.
The impact of insurance coverage also plays a significant role. The percentage of insured residents, and the types of insurance plans available, affect access to care. Areas with a high rate of uninsured residents may face challenges in receiving preventative care and managing chronic conditions. The health score must factor in the accessibility of affordable healthcare options and the availability of resources for those who are uninsured or underinsured.
Further, the health score analysis considers the presence of public health initiatives and community programs. Are there programs focused on preventative care, such as health screenings or vaccination drives? Does the community have access to resources that promote healthy lifestyles, such as fitness centers or farmers' markets? The existence of these initiatives reflects a proactive approach to community health and contributes to a higher overall health score.
Finally, the health score should be dynamic. It should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. New practices may open, telemedicine adoption may increase, and new community programs may be implemented. A static assessment quickly becomes outdated. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are crucial for maintaining an accurate and relevant health score. The health score is a snapshot in time.
In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for doctors in ZIP Code 30216 and primary care availability in Flovilla requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the broader healthcare ecosystem. This analysis should also consider the demographics of the population, insurance coverage, and public health initiatives. The health score is not a static number; it is a dynamic measure that must be regularly updated to reflect the evolving healthcare landscape.
To visualize the data and gain deeper insights into the healthcare landscape of 30216 and surrounding areas, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. They offer a powerful tool for visualizing healthcare data, allowing you to see the distribution of physicians, hospitals, and other resources, and identify areas with potential healthcare disparities.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like