Overall Health Score

30552, Lakemont, Georgia Overall Health Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 30552, Lakemont, Georgia

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 30552, Lakemont, Georgia is 37 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.69 percent of the residents in 30552 has some form of health insurance. 45.75 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.25 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30552 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 356 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 11 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30552. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 451 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,363 health care providers accessible to residents in 30552, Lakemont, Georgia.

Health Scores in 30552, Lakemont, Georgia

Overall Health Score 28
People Score 51
Provider Score 37
Hospital Score 31
Travel Score 41

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

30552 Lakemont Georgia
Providers per 10,000 residents 1,875.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 9,223.60 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 6,518.85 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 30552, Lakemont, Georgia

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 30552 & Primary Care Availability in Lakemont

Assessing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 30552, encompassing the area of Lakemont, requires a multifaceted analysis. This evaluation considers several key factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Each of these components contributes to a holistic understanding of the community's access to and quality of healthcare.

The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. It directly impacts access to care, with a higher ratio potentially indicating longer wait times for appointments and increased pressure on existing providers. Determining the exact ratio for 30552 necessitates accessing data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards. This data, combined with population figures for the area, will paint a picture of the potential strain on primary care physicians. If the ratio is unfavorable, it suggests a need for strategies to improve access, such as attracting new physicians or expanding existing practices.

Identifying standout practices within 30552 is crucial. These practices often serve as models for quality care, innovation, and patient satisfaction. Factors to consider include the presence of board-certified physicians, accreditation by reputable organizations, and patient reviews. Practices demonstrating a commitment to preventative care, chronic disease management, and patient education are particularly valuable. Investigating the specific services offered by these practices, such as specialized clinics or extended hours, provides a deeper understanding of the healthcare ecosystem's strengths.

Telemedicine adoption represents a significant trend impacting healthcare access, particularly in rural or underserved areas. The analysis must evaluate the extent to which doctors in 30552 utilize telemedicine platforms. This includes assessing the types of services offered virtually (e.g., consultations, follow-up appointments), the technology used (e.g., video conferencing, remote monitoring), and the patient population served. Widespread telemedicine adoption can improve access to care, especially for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. A low adoption rate could indicate missed opportunities to enhance patient convenience and expand healthcare reach.

Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. Evaluating the availability of mental health services within 30552 involves assessing the number of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors practicing in the area. The presence of mental health clinics, support groups, and partnerships with local hospitals are also important considerations. The analysis should explore whether these resources are accessible to all residents, including those with limited financial means or transportation challenges. Addressing any gaps in mental health services is critical for the well-being of the community.

Primary care availability in Lakemont, within the broader context of 30552, warrants specific attention. The analysis should focus on the distribution of primary care physicians within Lakemont itself. Are there sufficient primary care providers to meet the needs of the local population? Are there any areas within Lakemont that are underserved? Factors like the proximity of primary care practices to residential areas, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the availability of same-day appointments should be considered. Assessing the accessibility of primary care is fundamental to the overall health of the community.

The overall health score for doctors in 30552 and primary care availability in Lakemont will be a composite measure. It will integrate the various factors discussed, assigning weights based on their relative importance. The physician-to-patient ratio will likely carry significant weight, reflecting its direct impact on access to care. The presence of standout practices and the adoption of telemedicine will contribute positively to the score, while deficiencies in mental health resources will negatively impact it. The score will also consider the specific availability of primary care within Lakemont, reflecting its localized importance.

The final score will provide a valuable snapshot of the healthcare landscape in 30552. It will highlight strengths, identify areas for improvement, and inform strategies to enhance the community's health outcomes. The analysis should be updated regularly to track progress and adapt to changing healthcare trends. It will also provide a baseline for measuring the impact of any interventions or initiatives aimed at improving healthcare access and quality.

The analysis should also consider the demographics of the population within 30552. Factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity can influence healthcare needs and access. Understanding the specific needs of the community allows for a more targeted and effective approach to healthcare improvement. For instance, a large elderly population might require a greater emphasis on geriatric care, while a community with a high rate of chronic diseases might benefit from increased access to specialized care and disease management programs.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the infrastructure supporting healthcare delivery. This includes the presence of hospitals, urgent care centers, pharmacies, and other healthcare facilities. The proximity of these facilities to residents, the availability of transportation options, and the level of coordination among healthcare providers all contribute to the overall health of the community. A well-integrated healthcare system is essential for providing comprehensive and coordinated care.

The analysis should also assess the level of health literacy within the community. Health literacy refers to an individual's ability to understand and use health information to make informed decisions. Low health literacy can lead to poor health outcomes, as individuals may struggle to navigate the healthcare system, understand medical instructions, and manage their health conditions effectively. Strategies to improve health literacy, such as providing patient education materials in multiple languages and offering culturally sensitive healthcare services, can significantly improve the health of the community.

In conclusion, evaluating the overall health score for doctors in 30552 and primary care availability in Lakemont requires a comprehensive and data-driven approach. By considering physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and primary care accessibility, a more complete picture of the healthcare landscape emerges. This analysis provides valuable insights for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members alike, guiding efforts to improve health outcomes and create a healthier community.

To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in 30552 and other areas, consider exploring the power of spatial data and mapping.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 30552, Lakemont, Georgia

You may also like

30581, Wiley, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 1.70 Miles

Total Population:

30573, Tallulah Falls, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 2.70 Miles

Total Population:

30576, Tiger, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 5.06 Miles

Total Population:

30525, Clayton, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 8.13 Miles

Total Population:

30523, Clarkesville, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 8.36 Miles

Total Population:

30562, Mountain City, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 10.50 Miles

Total Population:

30598, Toccoa Falls, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 12.74 Miles

Total Population:

30568, Rabun Gap, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 12.91 Miles

Total Population:

30544, Habersham, Georgia
Overall Health Score
Overall Health Score

Distance from 30552: 14.28 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 30552, Lakemont, Georgia