The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 31546, Jesup, Georgia is 11 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 68.55 percent of the residents in 31546 has some form of health insurance. 30.69 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.11 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31546 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,802 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31546. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,164 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 354 health care providers accessible to residents in 31546, Jesup, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31546, Jesup, Georgia
Overall Health Score | 0 |
---|---|
People Score | 15 |
Provider Score | 11 |
Hospital Score | 11 |
Travel Score | 15 |
31546 | Jesup | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 139.80 | 3,858.52 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 688.69 | 15,919.62 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 1,008.95 | 23,031.45 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Jesup, Georgia (ZIP Code 31546)
Assessing the overall health landscape within Jesup, Georgia, specifically focusing on ZIP code 31546, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis delves into the availability of primary care physicians, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. Ultimately, we aim to provide an 'Overall Health Score' assessment, considering the unique challenges and opportunities within this community.
Jesup, a relatively small city in Wayne County, faces inherent challenges in healthcare access that are common to rural communities. Population density is a critical factor. Lower population density can translate to fewer healthcare providers per capita, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially limited specialized care options. This scarcity is often exacerbated by socioeconomic factors, which can impact health outcomes and further strain existing resources.
One of the fundamental metrics for evaluating healthcare access is the physician-to-patient ratio. The national average provides a benchmark. A lower ratio, indicating fewer doctors per resident, can signal potential difficulties in accessing timely and consistent medical care. Specific data on the physician-to-patient ratio within 31546 is essential. Publicly available data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state-level health departments would be the most reliable sources for this information. If the ratio in Jesup is significantly below the national average, it would negatively impact the 'Overall Health Score'.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality and reputation of existing practices are crucial. Identifying 'standout practices' involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction scores, the range of services offered, the presence of board-certified physicians, and the use of advanced medical technologies. Local hospitals, such as Wayne Memorial Hospital, and their associated clinics are central to this assessment. Analyzing online reviews, physician directories, and the hospital's website can help identify practices that consistently receive positive feedback and demonstrate a commitment to high-quality patient care. Practices recognized for their comprehensive services, patient-centered approach, and integration of technology would contribute positively to the overall score.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, offers a potential solution to geographical barriers and can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas. Assessing the availability of telehealth appointments with primary care physicians, specialists, and mental health professionals is vital. Practices that actively utilize telemedicine platforms, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and electronic prescription services, would receive a higher score. The ease of access to these services and the availability of technical support for patients are also important considerations.
Mental health resources are a crucial component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors, is paramount. Assessing the number of mental health providers, their specialties, and their acceptance of insurance is essential. The presence of community mental health centers, support groups, and crisis intervention services would positively impact the score. Furthermore, the integration of mental health services into primary care practices is a growing trend that improves access and coordination of care. The extent to which this integration exists in Jesup is another factor to consider.
The 'Overall Health Score' for Jesup, 31546, would be a composite measure, weighing these various factors. A low physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine adoption, and a scarcity of mental health resources would negatively impact the score. Conversely, the presence of high-quality practices, a robust telemedicine infrastructure, and readily available mental health services would contribute positively. The score would reflect the overall accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of healthcare services available to the residents of Jesup.
The analysis must also consider the specific needs of the local population. Factors such as the prevalence of chronic diseases, the demographics of the community, and the availability of social support services can influence health outcomes. Data on these factors, such as rates of diabetes, heart disease, and obesity, would provide a more complete picture of the health challenges facing the community. The presence of community health initiatives, such as health education programs and preventative care services, would also be considered.
In conclusion, the 'Overall Health Score' for Jesup, Georgia (31546) would be a nuanced assessment, reflecting the complex interplay of factors that influence health outcomes. It is not a static measure but rather a dynamic evaluation that requires ongoing monitoring and analysis. Continuous assessment helps identify areas for improvement and allows for the development of targeted interventions to address the specific healthcare needs of the community. The score serves as a valuable tool for healthcare providers, policymakers, and residents alike, guiding efforts to improve the health and well-being of the people of Jesup.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like