The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 31639, Nashville, Georgia is 16 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 78.19 percent of the residents in 31639 has some form of health insurance. 39.83 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 51.23 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31639 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,409 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31639. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,982 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 178 health care providers accessible to residents in 31639, Nashville, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31639, Nashville, Georgia
Overall Health Score | 5 |
---|---|
People Score | 19 |
Provider Score | 16 |
Hospital Score | 21 |
Travel Score | 44 |
31639 | Nashville | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 48.47 | 7,684.12 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 217.21 | 34,314.31 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 243.43 | 38,558.91 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: 31639 Doctors & Nashville Primary Care
This analysis provides an "Overall Health Score" assessment, comparing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 31639 (a rural area) and the primary care availability in Nashville, Tennessee, a major metropolitan center. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources, aiming to paint a comprehensive picture of healthcare access and quality in these distinct locales. The scoring system, though not explicitly numerical, will rely on qualitative comparisons, highlighting strengths and weaknesses within each region.
**ZIP Code 31639: A Rural Healthcare Landscape**
The healthcare environment in ZIP code 31639 likely faces significant challenges inherent to rural settings. One of the most pressing issues is the physician-to-patient ratio. Rural areas often experience a shortage of physicians, particularly primary care doctors and specialists. This scarcity translates into longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances for patients, and potential difficulties in accessing specialized care. The limited availability of healthcare providers can also lead to a strain on existing resources, potentially impacting the quality of care.
Standout practices in 31639, if any, are likely to be small, community-focused clinics or solo practices. These practices often serve as the cornerstone of healthcare access in rural areas. Their success hinges on providing comprehensive care, building strong patient relationships, and navigating the challenges of limited resources. The ability to attract and retain qualified medical professionals is crucial for their sustainability. These practices may also be more likely to embrace innovative approaches to patient care.
Telemedicine adoption in 31639 may be a crucial factor in mitigating the geographic limitations of healthcare access. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with doctors remotely, reducing the need for travel and expanding access to specialized care. The availability of reliable internet connectivity, however, can be a major hurdle in rural areas. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflow, and those that offer telehealth services for chronic disease management, will likely score higher in the overall health assessment.
Mental health resources in 31639 are likely to be scarce. Rural areas often lack the infrastructure and funding to support robust mental health services. This shortage can lead to delayed diagnoses, limited access to therapy and medication, and increased rates of mental health crises. The presence of any mental health services, such as a local counselor or access to telehealth-based mental healthcare, would be a significant positive indicator. The availability of resources for substance abuse treatment is also a critical component of the overall health score.
**Nashville Primary Care: A Metropolitan Perspective**
Nashville, as a major metropolitan area, presents a different set of healthcare dynamics. The physician-to-patient ratio is likely to be more favorable compared to 31639. Nashville boasts a concentration of hospitals, medical centers, and private practices, offering a wider range of choices for patients. This increased competition can also drive improvements in quality of care and patient satisfaction.
Standout practices in Nashville may include large, multi-specialty groups or innovative clinics that specialize in specific areas of primary care. These practices may emphasize patient-centered care, utilize advanced technologies, and offer extended hours or weekend appointments to enhance convenience. The presence of practices that have achieved recognition for quality of care, patient satisfaction, or innovative approaches to healthcare delivery will be a positive factor.
Telemedicine adoption in Nashville is likely to be more widespread than in 31639. The city's infrastructure and technological capabilities support the integration of telehealth services. Many practices in Nashville offer virtual appointments, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, improving access to care and convenience. The availability of telehealth options for both primary care and specialist consultations will positively impact the overall health score.
Mental health resources in Nashville are generally more abundant than in rural areas. The city is home to a range of mental health providers, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. The presence of specialized mental health clinics, support groups, and crisis intervention services will contribute to a higher overall health score. The availability of mental health resources for specific populations, such as children, adolescents, or veterans, will also be a key consideration.
**Comparative Analysis and Overall Health Score**
Comparing the two regions, Nashville likely receives a higher overall health score than 31639. The metropolitan area benefits from a more favorable physician-to-patient ratio, a wider range of healthcare providers, and greater access to specialized care. Telemedicine adoption is likely to be more prevalent in Nashville, further enhancing access and convenience. While Nashville may have its own challenges, such as higher healthcare costs and potential disparities in access for certain populations, its overall healthcare infrastructure is significantly stronger than that of the rural area.
31639, on the other hand, faces challenges related to physician shortages, limited access to specialized care, and potential difficulties in accessing mental health resources. However, the presence of dedicated community-based practices and the successful integration of telemedicine can improve the overall health score.
**Conclusion**
The healthcare landscape in 31639 and Nashville presents distinct characteristics. While Nashville offers a more robust healthcare infrastructure, 31639's healthcare system depends on the commitment of local providers and the adoption of innovative solutions. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing targeted strategies to improve healthcare access and quality in both regions.
For a deeper dive into the healthcare landscape of these and other locations, explore the power of geospatial analysis. **Click here to discover how CartoChrome maps can provide valuable insights into healthcare access, resource allocation, and population health trends.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like