41659, Stanville, Kentucky Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 41659, Stanville, Kentucky is 71 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.35 percent of the residents in 41659 has some form of health insurance. 74.16 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 22.48 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 41659 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 235 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 41659. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 205 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,257 health care providers accessible to residents in 41659, Stanville, Kentucky.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Stanville, KY (ZIP Code 41659)

Assessing the overall health landscape of Stanville, Kentucky (ZIP Code 41659) requires a multifaceted approach, considering factors beyond the simple presence of medical professionals. This analysis delves into physician-to-patient ratios, the characteristics of local practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, ultimately aiming to provide an informed 'Overall Health Score'.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. In rural areas like Stanville, the availability of primary care physicians often lags behind urban centers. National averages suggest a desirable ratio of approximately one primary care physician per 1,500 residents. However, in Stanville, given its geographical isolation and potential for an aging population, the ratio is likely to be less favorable. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state health departments would be essential to determine the precise ratio. A low ratio signals potential challenges in accessing timely and consistent primary care, leading to delayed diagnoses and poorer health outcomes.

Evaluating the structure and quality of local primary care practices is also crucial. Factors to consider include the number of physicians within a practice, the range of services offered (e.g., preventative care, chronic disease management, specialist referrals), and the availability of ancillary services like laboratory testing and imaging. Practices with a higher concentration of physicians may offer greater appointment availability and a broader scope of expertise. Examining patient reviews and satisfaction surveys, if available, can provide valuable insights into the quality of care delivered. The presence of board-certified physicians and accreditation by reputable organizations like the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) can also indicate a commitment to quality.

Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly impact healthcare access in rural areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can overcome geographical barriers and improve patient convenience. The availability of telemedicine services, particularly for follow-up appointments, chronic disease management, and mental health consultations, would be a significant positive factor in the Overall Health Score. Conversely, a lack of telemedicine infrastructure could indicate a missed opportunity to improve access to care.

Mental health resources are a particularly vital component of the overall health picture. The prevalence of mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, can be exacerbated in rural communities due to factors like social isolation, economic hardship, and limited access to specialized care. Assessing the availability of mental health providers, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors, is essential. The presence of community mental health centers, support groups, and partnerships with local schools and organizations can indicate a more robust mental health infrastructure. The ability to access mental health services in a timely manner, either in-person or through telemedicine, is a key determinant of the Overall Health Score.

Beyond these core factors, other considerations could influence the score. The presence of a local hospital or urgent care facility provides a safety net for acute medical needs. The availability of transportation services, such as public transportation or ride-sharing programs, can impact access to care, particularly for those without personal vehicles. The overall socioeconomic conditions of the community, including poverty rates and educational attainment levels, can also influence health outcomes. These factors, while not directly related to healthcare delivery, can indirectly affect the health of the population.

To provide a comprehensive Overall Health Score, a weighted scoring system should be implemented. Each of the factors discussed – physician-to-patient ratio, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – should be assigned a weight based on its perceived importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted more heavily than the availability of transportation services. Each factor would then be scored based on its specific characteristics. For example, a high physician-to-patient ratio would receive a lower score, while a practice with a high patient satisfaction rating would receive a higher score.

The final Overall Health Score would be a composite of these individual scores, providing a single metric to represent the overall health landscape in Stanville. This score would be valuable for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike. It would allow residents to assess the accessibility and quality of healthcare services in their community. Healthcare providers could use the score to identify areas for improvement and to benchmark their performance against other practices. Policymakers could use the score to allocate resources effectively and to address specific health disparities.

However, the limitations of this analysis must also be acknowledged. The accuracy of the Overall Health Score is dependent on the availability and reliability of data. Publicly available data may not always be up-to-date or comprehensive. Furthermore, the scoring system is subjective, and the weights assigned to each factor may vary depending on the perspective of the evaluator. Despite these limitations, a well-constructed Overall Health Score can provide a valuable snapshot of the health landscape in Stanville and can serve as a starting point for efforts to improve the health and well-being of the community.

To gain a more visual and interactive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Stanville, and to explore the data discussed in this analysis in a spatial context, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visualize physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant data, allowing for a deeper understanding of healthcare access and availability.