The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 41713, Avawam, Kentucky is 65 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 65.97 percent of the residents in 41713 has some form of health insurance. 13.13 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.97 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 41713 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 132 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 41713. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,770 health care providers accessible to residents in 41713, Avawam, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 41713, Avawam, Kentucky
Overall Health Score | 83 |
---|---|
People Score | 98 |
Provider Score | 65 |
Hospital Score | 37 |
Travel Score | 45 |
41713 | Avawam | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 8,059.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 20,303.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP Code 41713, which encompasses the community of Avawam, Kentucky, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, assess the physician-to-patient ratio, highlight standout medical practices, examine the adoption of telemedicine, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide an "Overall Health Score" assessment, offering a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare ecosystem in this specific geographic area.
The foundation of a healthy community rests on the accessibility of primary care. In Avawam, the availability of primary care physicians is a critical factor. Determining the exact number of active, practicing primary care physicians within the ZIP Code is the first step. This number must then be compared to the total population residing within 41713. This comparison yields the physician-to-patient ratio, a crucial metric for evaluating healthcare access. A low ratio, indicating a higher number of patients per physician, can signal potential challenges in timely appointments, increased wait times, and potentially, a less personalized level of care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater access and potentially improved health outcomes.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Identifying standout medical practices within Avawam requires evaluating several criteria. This includes the range of services offered (preventative care, chronic disease management, etc.), the credentials and experience of the physicians, patient satisfaction surveys, and the integration of technology to improve patient care. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, proactive health management, and the use of evidence-based medicine deserve recognition.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly vital, especially in rural communities. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, providing access to healthcare services for individuals who may face challenges in traveling to a physical clinic. Assessing the level of telemedicine adoption in Avawam involves examining the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring capabilities, and the use of digital health tools by local healthcare providers. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are likely to be better positioned to serve a wider patient population and improve healthcare accessibility.
Mental health resources are an integral component of overall health. The availability of mental health services in Avawam must be assessed. This includes the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. The accessibility of these services, including insurance acceptance, appointment availability, and the availability of telehealth options for mental health, are crucial factors. The integration of mental health services within primary care settings is also a positive indicator, promoting a holistic approach to patient well-being.
To arrive at an "Overall Health Score," a weighted scoring system can be employed. Each of the factors discussed above – physician-to-patient ratio, quality of primary care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability – would be assigned a weight reflecting its relative importance. For instance, physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption, reflecting the fundamental importance of access to a primary care physician. Each factor would then be scored based on the specific data gathered. The weighted scores would be summed to produce the final "Overall Health Score."
The data collection process is crucial. Gathering accurate information requires a multi-pronged approach. This includes consulting publicly available databases, such as those maintained by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure. Direct outreach to local medical practices, hospitals, and mental health providers is essential to gather specific information about services offered, telemedicine capabilities, and patient satisfaction. Patient surveys and community feedback can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and perceived quality of care.
The analysis should also consider the demographic characteristics of the population within 41713. Factors such as age distribution, socioeconomic status, and the prevalence of chronic diseases can significantly impact healthcare needs. Understanding these demographic factors is crucial for interpreting the "Overall Health Score" and identifying areas where healthcare services may need to be strengthened. For example, an aging population may require a greater emphasis on geriatric care and chronic disease management.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider any unique challenges faced by the community of Avawam. This could include geographical isolation, limited transportation options, or a shortage of specialized medical services. Identifying these challenges is essential for developing targeted strategies to improve healthcare access and outcomes. Collaborations between healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government agencies can play a vital role in addressing these challenges.
The "Overall Health Score" for Avawam (ZIP Code 41713) would be a numerical representation of the healthcare landscape, providing a snapshot of the community's health status. It's important to remember that this score is not a definitive judgment but a starting point for further investigation and improvement. The score should be used to identify areas of strength and weakness, guiding efforts to enhance healthcare access, quality, and outcomes. Regular monitoring and reassessment of the score over time would be essential to track progress and adapt strategies as needed.
The analysis process should be transparent and data-driven. All data sources and methodologies should be clearly documented to ensure the credibility and reliability of the "Overall Health Score." The findings should be communicated effectively to the community, healthcare providers, and policymakers to facilitate informed decision-making and collaborative efforts to improve health.
The final report should also include recommendations for improvement. Based on the identified strengths and weaknesses, specific strategies should be proposed to enhance healthcare access, quality, and outcomes in Avawam. These recommendations might include expanding telemedicine services, recruiting additional primary care physicians, increasing the availability of mental health resources, or promoting community health initiatives.
The ultimate goal is to empower the community of Avawam with the knowledge and resources needed to improve its overall health. This includes providing a clear understanding of the current healthcare landscape, identifying areas for improvement, and promoting collaborative efforts to create a healthier community. The "Overall Health Score" is a valuable tool for achieving this goal.
To visualize the healthcare landscape of Avawam and other communities in Kentucky, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps offer a dynamic way to understand the distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas with limited access, and visualize the "Overall Health Score" in relation to other geographic and demographic factors.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like