41749, Hyden, Kentucky Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 41749, Hyden, Kentucky is 52 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.24 percent of the residents in 41749 has some form of health insurance. 51.87 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 41749 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 335 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 41749. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 623 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,702 health care providers accessible to residents in 41749, Hyden, Kentucky.

The health landscape of Hyden, Kentucky, nestled within ZIP Code 41749, presents a complex picture when evaluating overall health scores. This analysis delves into the availability of primary care physicians, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the health environment, moving beyond simple metrics to grasp the realities faced by the community.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. In rural areas like Hyden, the ratio often presents a challenge. A limited number of primary care physicians serving a geographically dispersed population can lead to longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances, and potential difficulties in establishing consistent care. Accurately assessing this ratio requires considering the total population within the service area and the number of practicing primary care physicians, including family medicine, internal medicine, and general practice doctors. This data is not always readily available, requiring extensive research and data aggregation from various sources, including state licensing boards, medical directories, and population estimates.

The presence of standout medical practices can significantly impact the overall health score. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to quality care, patient satisfaction, and community outreach. Identifying these practices involves evaluating factors such as patient reviews, accreditations, the range of services offered, and the adoption of innovative technologies. Practices that embrace electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals, for example, often facilitate better communication and care coordination. Furthermore, practices that participate in value-based care models, which prioritize quality over quantity, can contribute to improved health outcomes.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. In a rural area, telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access specialist consultations, follow-up appointments, and chronic disease management services remotely. The availability of reliable internet connectivity is a prerequisite for successful telemedicine implementation. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves evaluating the number of practices offering telehealth services, the types of services available, and the platforms used. The degree to which telemedicine is integrated into the overall care delivery system is also important.

Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors, is crucial for addressing mental health needs within the community. Assessing mental health resources involves evaluating the number of mental health providers, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services. The presence of community mental health centers, crisis intervention services, and support groups can significantly enhance the overall mental health landscape.

The overall health score for Hyden, Kentucky, is inevitably influenced by the interplay of these factors. A low physician-to-patient ratio, limited access to specialist care, and a lack of telemedicine adoption can negatively impact the score. Conversely, the presence of high-quality medical practices, robust mental health resources, and a strong commitment to preventative care can improve the score. The score is not a static number but rather a reflection of the dynamic healthcare environment.

Primary care availability in Hyden is a significant consideration. The ability to secure timely appointments with primary care physicians is a cornerstone of preventative healthcare. The availability of these doctors, including their office hours, acceptance of insurance plans, and willingness to accept new patients, directly impacts the community’s ability to maintain their health. The presence of community health centers and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) can be a vital resource, particularly for underserved populations.

The impact of social determinants of health must also be considered. Factors such as poverty, education levels, access to healthy food, and housing conditions can significantly influence health outcomes. Addressing these social determinants is crucial for improving the overall health of the community. This requires collaboration between healthcare providers, social service agencies, and community organizations.

Evaluating the overall health score requires a nuanced approach that considers both quantitative and qualitative data. Analyzing patient satisfaction surveys, reviewing health outcomes data, and conducting community needs assessments can provide valuable insights. The health score should be viewed as a starting point for improvement, not a definitive judgment.

In conclusion, the health environment in Hyden, Kentucky, presents a complex picture. While challenges may exist, the community’s commitment to improving healthcare access and quality is evident. Further investigation, data analysis, and community engagement are necessary to fully understand the health landscape and identify areas for improvement.