42166, Summer Shade, Kentucky Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 42166, Summer Shade, Kentucky is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.23 percent of the residents in 42166 has some form of health insurance. 42.28 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.48 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42166 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 631 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42166. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 483 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 873 health care providers accessible to residents in 42166, Summer Shade, Kentucky.

Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 42166, encompassing Summer Shade, Kentucky, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers several key factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive “Overall Health Score” assessment, painting a picture of the community's access to and quality of healthcare.

The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per resident, often suggests limited access to care. Precise figures for 42166 can fluctuate. Data pulled from the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and the U.S. Census Bureau is necessary. This data, when analyzed, reveals the relative availability of primary care physicians, specialists, and other healthcare professionals. A lower ratio, when compared to state and national averages, would negatively impact the overall health score.

The presence and quality of medical practices significantly influence the overall health score. Are there established primary care clinics? Are there specialists available within a reasonable travel distance? Are the practices equipped with modern technology and staffed by experienced professionals? The reputation of these practices, as reflected in patient reviews and peer assessments, provides valuable insights. The presence of a well-regarded family practice or internal medicine clinic would positively influence the score. Conversely, a lack of established practices or a reliance on practitioners commuting from outside the area would negatively impact the score.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly in rural areas like Summer Shade. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, providing access to specialists and routine care. The availability of telehealth services, whether through local clinics or larger healthcare systems, directly impacts the overall health score. The ease of access, the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring), and the technological infrastructure supporting telemedicine all contribute to the assessment. A high level of telemedicine adoption, particularly for primary care and mental health services, would significantly boost the score.

Mental health resources are a critical component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, is crucial. The presence of support groups, counseling services, and crisis intervention resources also plays a vital role. The accessibility of these services, including insurance acceptance and affordability, directly impacts the health score. A scarcity of mental health resources, or limited access to them, would be a significant negative factor.

The overall health score is not a single number but a composite assessment. It reflects the interplay of these factors. The physician-to-patient ratio provides a baseline assessment of access. The quality of medical practices assesses the quality of care available. Telemedicine adoption assesses the use of technology to improve access. The availability of mental health resources assesses the community's ability to address a critical health need.

To calculate the score, each factor would be weighted based on its relative importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and the availability of mental health resources might be given higher weight than the adoption of telemedicine, although telemedicine’s importance is increasing. The assessment of each factor would be based on the available data, including government reports, healthcare provider directories, patient surveys, and community health assessments.

The final overall health score would then be categorized. For example, a score above a certain threshold might be considered “Good,” indicating adequate access to and quality of care. A score below another threshold might be considered “Poor,” indicating significant deficiencies. The score would then be compared to state and national averages to provide context.

Specifics for 42166 are necessary. This includes identifying the primary care physicians practicing within the zip code, the specialties available, and the number of patients each physician serves. It requires a detailed examination of the existing clinics and their services. The availability of telemedicine services, including the platforms used and the range of services offered, must be assessed. Finally, the availability of mental health resources, including the number of mental health professionals, the types of services offered, and the accessibility of those services, must be evaluated.

Standout practices within 42166, if any, would be identified. This might include clinics with a strong reputation for patient care, those that have embraced telemedicine, or those that offer a comprehensive range of services. These practices would serve as positive examples, potentially influencing the overall health score positively.

The adoption of telemedicine in 42166 would be assessed. This includes the types of telemedicine services offered, the platforms used, and the patient experience. A high level of telemedicine adoption, particularly for primary care and mental health services, would significantly boost the overall health score.

The availability of mental health resources would be assessed. This includes the number of mental health professionals, the types of services offered, and the accessibility of those services. A scarcity of mental health resources, or limited access to them, would be a significant negative factor.

The analysis of these factors would be combined to create a comprehensive overall health score for 42166. The score would be categorized and compared to state and national averages. The final assessment would provide a clear picture of the community's access to and quality of healthcare, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.

This analysis requires gathering and analyzing data from various sources. This includes government reports, healthcare provider directories, patient surveys, and community health assessments. The specific data points collected and analyzed will vary depending on the availability of information. The analysis will be updated as new data becomes available.

To visualize the health landscape of 42166, and to better understand the distribution of healthcare resources and the location of medical facilities, consider exploring the power of spatial analysis. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize the data, identify patterns, and gain a deeper understanding of the health of your community. Explore CartoChrome maps today to visualize the health landscape of Summer Shade.