The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 42631, Marshes Siding, Kentucky is 9 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 42631 has some form of health insurance. 75.92 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 32.46 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42631 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 75 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42631. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 133 health care providers accessible to residents in 42631, Marshes Siding, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 42631, Marshes Siding, Kentucky
| Overall Health Score | 50 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 99 |
| Provider Score | 9 |
| Hospital Score | 62 |
| Travel Score | 22 |
| 42631 | Marshes Siding | Kentucky | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 1,361.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 5,416.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Marshes Siding, Kentucky (ZIP Code 42631)
Marshes Siding, Kentucky, a small community nestled within ZIP code 42631, presents a unique challenge when assessing its overall health landscape. This analysis delves into the availability of primary care physicians, the physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of telemedicine, and the presence of mental health resources. We will consider these factors to formulate an "Overall Health Score" for the area, acknowledging the limitations inherent in data collection and the specific context of a rural setting.
The cornerstone of any community's health is access to primary care. In Marshes Siding, the availability of primary care physicians is a critical factor. The geographical isolation and relatively small population size suggest that the physician-to-patient ratio is likely a significant indicator of healthcare access. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio, while desirable, doesn't guarantee quality; it merely suggests greater access.
Data on physician-to-patient ratios can be obtained from various sources, including the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards. However, these datasets often provide generalized information, and specific data for a small area like Marshes Siding may be limited. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis would necessitate on-the-ground research, including contacting local clinics and hospitals to determine the actual number of practicing primary care physicians serving the community.
Standout practices, if any exist within or near the ZIP code, would play a crucial role in elevating the overall health score. Identifying clinics or individual practitioners known for their commitment to patient care, their adoption of innovative practices, or their specialized services would be a key part of the analysis. This could involve reviewing patient testimonials, examining online reviews, and assessing the clinic's accreditation status. These practices would likely be characterized by a patient-centered approach, a focus on preventative care, and a commitment to utilizing technology to enhance patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect of the overall health score. In a rural area like Marshes Siding, where geographical barriers to healthcare access are significant, telemedicine can be a game-changer. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to specialists. Analyzing the availability of telemedicine services, the types of services offered, and the ease of access would be essential. This includes assessing whether local clinics offer telemedicine options and the extent to which patients are utilizing these services.
Mental health resources are often underrepresented in rural communities, yet their importance cannot be overstated. The overall health score must consider the availability of mental health services, including therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. This would involve researching the presence of mental health professionals in the area, the availability of counseling services, and the existence of any community-based mental health programs. A lack of adequate mental health resources would significantly detract from the overall health score, as mental health is inextricably linked to physical health and overall well-being.
The quality of healthcare is not solely determined by the number of physicians or the availability of resources; it is also about the quality of care provided. Factors like the qualifications of the physicians, the accreditation of the clinics, and the patient satisfaction levels all contribute to the overall health score. Assessing these factors requires a multi-faceted approach, incorporating data from various sources, including patient surveys, accreditation reports, and online reviews.
The overall health score for Marshes Siding, Kentucky, would be determined by weighing these various factors. The physician-to-patient ratio would be a significant factor, with a lower ratio negatively impacting the score. The presence of standout practices, particularly those offering specialized services or adopting innovative technologies, would positively influence the score. The availability of telemedicine services would be another key factor, especially in a rural area. The presence of robust mental health resources would be crucial for a high score.
The final score would be a composite measure reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in Marshes Siding. It would provide a valuable snapshot of the community's healthcare access and quality, highlighting areas that need improvement. It is important to acknowledge that the score would be a snapshot in time, and the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving.
The limitations of this analysis must be acknowledged. Data availability for a small, rural community is often limited, and the analysis would rely on the best available information. Furthermore, the analysis would be based on publicly available data and information obtained through research. A more in-depth assessment would require on-the-ground research, including interviews with healthcare providers and community members.
Despite these limitations, this analysis provides a valuable framework for understanding the healthcare landscape in Marshes Siding, Kentucky. It highlights the key factors that contribute to the overall health of the community and identifies areas where improvements are needed. The overall health score would serve as a benchmark, providing a basis for future assessments and tracking progress over time. It is a starting point for a deeper understanding of healthcare access and quality in this rural community.
For a comprehensive and visually engaging understanding of the healthcare landscape in Marshes Siding, and for exploring the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, consider utilizing the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can provide detailed visualizations of physician locations, clinic locations, and other relevant data, allowing for a more nuanced and insightful understanding of healthcare access and availability.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like