02743, Acushnet, Massachusetts Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 02743, Acushnet, Massachusetts is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 99.82 percent of the residents in 02743 has some form of health insurance. 40.47 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02743 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,018 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02743. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,270 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,091 health care providers accessible to residents in 02743, Acushnet, Massachusetts.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Acushnet, MA (ZIP Code 02743)

Assessing the overall health landscape within Acushnet, Massachusetts (ZIP code 02743) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability and quality of primary care physicians, examining physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, exploring the adoption of telemedicine, and evaluating the availability of mental health resources. This holistic view will culminate in an overall health score, providing a snapshot of the community's access to and quality of healthcare.

The cornerstone of any healthy community is the availability of primary care physicians. In Acushnet, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator of access. While precise figures fluctuate, it's essential to determine if the ratio meets or exceeds the national average. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delayed diagnoses, and a less proactive approach to preventative care. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests a more accessible healthcare system. Publicly available data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, combined with information from healthcare directories and insurance providers, will be necessary to calculate this ratio accurately.

Beyond mere numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within Acushnet is vital. This involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction scores, which can be gleaned from online reviews and patient surveys. Accreditation status, such as those awarded by organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), can also indicate a commitment to quality and patient-centered care. Furthermore, examining the range of services offered, including preventative screenings, chronic disease management, and specialized care coordination, provides a more comprehensive picture of a practice's capabilities.

Telemedicine, the use of technology to deliver healthcare remotely, has gained significant traction, especially in the wake of recent health crises. Assessing the adoption of telemedicine within Acushnet is crucial. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual appointments, the types of services offered via telehealth (e.g., routine check-ups, medication management, mental health counseling), and the accessibility of these services to all residents, including those with limited internet access or technological proficiency. Practices that embrace telemedicine can enhance patient convenience, reduce travel time, and improve access to care, particularly for those with mobility limitations or residing in geographically isolated areas.

Mental health is an integral component of overall well-being, and the availability of mental health resources in Acushnet is a critical factor in determining the community's health score. This analysis must assess the presence of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. It should also evaluate the availability of mental health services, such as individual therapy, group therapy, and psychiatric medication management. Furthermore, it's essential to consider the accessibility of these resources, including insurance coverage, affordability, and wait times for appointments. Partnerships with local hospitals, community health centers, and mental health organizations can indicate a robust and integrated approach to mental healthcare.

The overall health score for Acushnet will be a composite metric, reflecting the interplay of these factors. It will consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. A high score would indicate a community with ample access to quality healthcare, while a lower score would highlight areas needing improvement. For instance, a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, coupled with high patient satisfaction scores, extensive telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health services, would contribute to a higher overall score. Conversely, a low physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine options, and a scarcity of mental health resources would negatively impact the score.

To further refine the analysis, it is important to consider the demographics of Acushnet. The age distribution of the population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the socioeconomic status of residents can all influence healthcare needs and access. For example, a community with a large elderly population may require more geriatric care services, while a community with a high prevalence of diabetes may need more specialized diabetes management programs. Incorporating demographic data into the analysis provides a more nuanced and accurate assessment of the healthcare landscape.

Another critical aspect to consider is the integration of healthcare services. This includes the degree to which primary care physicians coordinate care with specialists, hospitals, and other healthcare providers. A well-integrated healthcare system promotes continuity of care, reduces medical errors, and improves patient outcomes. This can be assessed by examining the use of electronic health records (EHRs), the implementation of care management programs, and the frequency of communication between healthcare providers.

The role of community health initiatives should also be considered. Local organizations and community health centers often play a vital role in providing healthcare services and promoting health education. These initiatives can include free health screenings, wellness programs, and outreach efforts to underserved populations. Assessing the scope and impact of these initiatives can provide valuable insights into the community's commitment to improving overall health.

Finally, the analysis must consider the impact of health insurance coverage. The percentage of residents with health insurance, the types of insurance plans available, and the affordability of healthcare services are all critical factors in determining access to care. Communities with high rates of uninsured or underinsured residents often face significant challenges in providing adequate healthcare.

In conclusion, the overall health score for Acushnet, Massachusetts (ZIP code 02743) is a complex metric that reflects the combined influence of physician availability, the quality of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the integration of healthcare services. By considering these factors, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the community's healthcare landscape and identify areas for improvement.

For a detailed, data-driven visualization of the healthcare landscape in Acushnet and surrounding areas, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. Gain a deeper understanding of physician locations, healthcare resource distribution, and demographic data by using CartoChrome's interactive mapping capabilities.