02779, Berkley, Massachusetts Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 02779, Berkley, Massachusetts is 65 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 98.74 percent of the residents in 02779 has some form of health insurance. 27.14 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 83.97 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02779 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,604 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02779. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 918 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,970 health care providers accessible to residents in 02779, Berkley, Massachusetts.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 02779 and Primary Care Availability in Berkley

This analysis provides an overall health score assessment for medical resources within ZIP code 02779, encompassing the town of Berkley, Massachusetts. The evaluation considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This assessment aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the healthcare landscape within this specific geographic area.

The foundation of any health score analysis lies in the availability of primary care physicians. In Berkley, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. Data reveals a potentially strained ratio, suggesting that the number of primary care doctors per capita might be lower than the ideal. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and increased pressure on existing medical professionals. The specific ratio fluctuates based on data sources, but the trend warrants close examination and ongoing monitoring.

The quality of primary care is also a key consideration. While a high physician-to-patient ratio can be a concern, the quality of care provided by existing practices can mitigate some of the negative impacts. Assessing the reputation of local practices is essential. This involves analyzing patient reviews, considering the accreditation status of medical facilities, and evaluating the range of services offered. Standout practices, those recognized for exceptional patient care, specialized services, or innovative approaches, can significantly elevate the overall health score. Identifying these practices and understanding their operational models provides valuable insights.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor in assessing the health score. The ability to access healthcare remotely, through video consultations, phone calls, or online portals, can improve access, especially for those with mobility issues, transportation challenges, or busy schedules. The level of telemedicine integration within local practices is a significant indicator of the community's health score. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can offer greater convenience and flexibility, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes.

Mental health resources are a vital component of overall well-being. The availability of mental health services, including therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups, directly impacts the community's health score. Assessing the number of mental health professionals in the area, the types of services they offer, and the accessibility of these services is crucial. A shortage of mental health resources can negatively affect the overall health score, potentially leading to untreated mental health conditions and a decline in overall community well-being.

The presence of specialized medical services also contributes to the overall health score. While primary care forms the foundation, access to specialists such as cardiologists, endocrinologists, and dermatologists, is important. The availability of these specialized services within the 02779 ZIP code, or within a reasonable travel distance, enhances the overall health score. The absence of critical specializations can force residents to seek care outside the immediate area, potentially increasing travel time and inconvenience.

Geographic accessibility is a critical consideration. Even with a reasonable physician-to-patient ratio, the physical location of medical facilities can impact the health score. Are practices concentrated in one area, or are they dispersed throughout the town? Is public transportation readily available to medical facilities? These factors impact the ability of residents to access care, particularly for those with limited mobility or transportation options.

The demographics of the community must also be considered. The age distribution, socioeconomic status, and prevalence of chronic diseases within the population all influence the health score. A community with a higher proportion of elderly residents, for example, may require a greater focus on geriatric care and specialized services. Understanding the specific health needs of the community is essential for a comprehensive health score assessment.

The integration of technology in healthcare is another factor to consider. The use of electronic health records, patient portals, and online appointment scheduling can improve efficiency and patient engagement. Practices that embrace technology often offer a more streamlined and patient-centered experience, which can positively impact the overall health score.

Community outreach and health education initiatives also play a role. Local health organizations and medical practices that actively engage in community outreach programs, such as health screenings, educational workshops, and preventative care campaigns, can significantly improve the health score. These initiatives promote preventative care and empower residents to take control of their health.

Finally, the overall health score is not a static number. It is a dynamic measure that should be regularly reassessed. Changes in physician availability, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolving needs of the community all require ongoing monitoring and analysis. This continuous evaluation allows for the identification of areas for improvement and the implementation of strategies to enhance the health and well-being of the residents of Berkley.

In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for doctors in ZIP code 02779 and primary care availability in Berkley requires a multifaceted approach. It involves analyzing physician-to-patient ratios, evaluating the quality of care, assessing telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources and specialized medical services. Understanding the geographic accessibility of care, the demographics of the community, and the use of technology in healthcare are also crucial factors. This comprehensive analysis provides a valuable framework for evaluating and improving the health and well-being of the residents of Berkley.